Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Resuscitation. 2018 Aug;129:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
We previously demonstrated that sustained inflation (SI) during chest compression (CC) significantly reduces time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) when compared to 3:1 compression:ventilation (C:V) ratio during neonatal resuscitation. However, the optimal length of SI during CC to improve ROSC and hemodynamic recovery in severely asphyxiated piglets is unknown.
To examine if different lengths of SI will improve ROSC and hemodynamic recovery in severely asphyxiated piglets.
Thirty newborn piglets (1-3 days) were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented and exposed to 30-min normocapnic hypoxia followed by asphyxia. Piglets were randomized into four groups: 3:1 C:V (n = 8), CC with an SI duration of either 20 s (CC+SI 20) (n = 8) or 60 s (CC+SI 60) (n = 8), and a sham group (n = 6). Cardiac function, carotid blood flow, cerebral and renal oxygenation as well as respiratory parameters were continuously recorded throughout the experiment.
When compared with 3:1 group, both CC+SI 20 and CC+SI 60 groups had significantly shorter ROSC time (p = 0.002). All three intervention groups had similar hemodynamic recovery by the end of 4 h observation period. There was no difference in lung injury markers among all experimental groups. However, when compared to the sham group, the concentrations of IL-6 (thalamus) and IL-6 + IL-8 (frontoparietal cortex) of the 3:1 C:V group were significantly higher, respectively.
Even though relatively less animals achieved ROSC, CC during SI significantly improved ROSC time compared to 3:1 C:V in asphyxiated newborn piglets. However, there was no difference in ROSC characteristics and hemodynamic recovery between two CC+SI groups.
我们之前的研究表明,与 3:1 按压通气(C:V)相比,在新生儿复苏期间行持续按压(SI)可显著缩短自主循环恢复(ROSC)时间。然而,在严重窒息仔猪中,行 CC 时 SI 的最佳持续时间以改善 ROSC 和血流动力学恢复尚不清楚。
探讨不同长度的 SI 是否会改善严重窒息仔猪的 ROSC 和血流动力学恢复。
30 只新生仔猪(1-3 天)行麻醉、气管插管、仪器检测,然后暴露于 30 分钟常压低氧,继以窒息。仔猪随机分为四组:3:1 C:V(n=8)、持续 20 秒的 CC+SI 20(n=8)或持续 60 秒的 CC+SI 60(n=8),以及假手术组(n=6)。在整个实验过程中,连续记录心功能、颈动脉血流、脑和肾氧合以及呼吸参数。
与 3:1 组相比,CC+SI 20 和 CC+SI 60 组的 ROSC 时间明显更短(p=0.002)。在 4 小时观察期结束时,所有三组干预组的血流动力学恢复相似。所有实验组的肺损伤标志物均无差异。然而,与假手术组相比,3:1 C:V 组的 IL-6(丘脑)和 IL-6+IL-8(额顶叶皮质)浓度显著升高。
尽管相对较少的动物达到 ROSC,但与 3:1 C:V 相比,SI 期间的 CC 可显著缩短窒息新生仔猪的 ROSC 时间。然而,在两个 CC+SI 组之间,ROSC 特征和血流动力学恢复无差异。