Wagner Michael, Cheung Po-Yin, Yaskina Maryna, Lee Tze-Fun, Vieth Vanessa A, O'Reilly Megan, Schmölzer Georg M
Division of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Neonatal Research Unit, Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 12;9:641132. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.641132. eCollection 2021.
Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) occurs in asphyxiated newborn piglets and infants. We aimed to examine whether different cardiac rhythms (asystole, bradycardia, PEA) affects the resuscitation outcomes during continuous chest compressions (CC) during sustained inflations (CC+SI). This study is a secondary analysis of four previous randomized controlled animal trials that compared CC+SI with different CC rate (90 or 120/min), SI duration (20 or 60 s), peak inflation pressure (10, 20, or 30 cmHO), and oxygen concentration (18, 21, or 100%). Sixty-six newborn mixed breed piglets (1-3 days of age, weight 1.7-2.4 kg) were obtained on the day of experimentation from the University Swine Research Technology Center. In all four studies, piglets were randomized into intervention or sham. Piglets randomized to "intervention" underwent both hypoxia and asphyxia, whereas, piglets randomized to "sham" received the same surgical protocol, stabilization, and equivalent experimental periods without hypoxia and asphyxia. To compare differences in asphyxiation time, time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hemodynamics, and survival rate in newborn piglets with asystole, bradycardia or PEA. Piglets with PEA ( = 29) and asystole ( = 13) had a significantly longer asphyxiation time and time to ROSC vs. bradycardia ( = 24). Survival rates were similar between all groups. Compared to their baseline, mean arterial pressure and carotid blood flow were significantly lower 4 h after resuscitation in all groups, while being significantly higher in the bradycardia group. This study indicates that cardiac rhythm before resuscitation influences the time to ROSC and hemodynamic recovery after ROSC.
无脉电活动(PEA)见于窒息的新生仔猪和婴儿。我们旨在研究不同的心律(心搏停止、心动过缓、PEA)在持续充气期间持续胸外按压(CC)(CC+SI)过程中是否会影响复苏结局。本研究是对之前四项随机对照动物试验的二次分析,这些试验比较了CC+SI与不同的CC速率(90或120次/分钟)、SI持续时间(20或60秒)、峰值充气压力(10、20或30 cmH₂O)以及氧浓度(18%、21%或100%)。在实验当天,从大学猪研究技术中心获得66只1至3日龄、体重1.7至2.4千克的新生杂种仔猪。在所有四项研究中,仔猪被随机分为干预组或假手术组。随机分配到“干预”组的仔猪经历缺氧和窒息,而随机分配到“假手术”组的仔猪接受相同的手术方案、稳定处理以及相同的实验周期,但无缺氧和窒息。为比较新生仔猪出现心搏停止、心动过缓或PEA时在窒息时间、自主循环恢复(ROSC)时间、血流动力学和存活率方面的差异。与心动过缓组(n = 24)相比,患有PEA(n = 29)和心搏停止(n = 13)的仔猪窒息时间和ROSC时间显著更长。所有组的存活率相似。与基线相比,复苏后4小时所有组的平均动脉压和颈动脉血流均显著降低,而心动过缓组显著更高。本研究表明,复苏前的心律会影响ROSC时间以及ROSC后的血流动力学恢复。