Suppr超能文献

持续胸部按压时的充气:一种改善小儿猪模型心肺复苏复苏和生存的新方法。

Sustained Inflation During Chest Compression: A New Technique of Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation That Improves Recovery and Survival in a Pediatric Porcine Model.

机构信息

Neonatal Research Unit, Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation Royal Alexandra Hospital Edmonton Alberta Canada.

Department of Pediatrics University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019136. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019136. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

Background Chest compression (CC) during sustained inflations (CC+SI) compared with CC with asynchronized ventilation (CCaV) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in asphyxiated pediatric piglets will reduce time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods and Results Piglets (20-23 days of age, weighing 6.2-10.2 kg) were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented, and exposed to asphyxia. Cardiac arrest was defined as mean arterial blood pressure <25 mm Hg with bradycardia. After cardiac arrest, piglets were randomized to CC+SI (n=12) or CCaV (n=12) or sham (n=8). Sham-operated animals had no asphyxia. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, carotid blood flow, cerebral oxygenation, and respiratory parameters were continuously recorded. There were no differences in baseline parameters or the duration and degree of asphyxiation. Median (interquartile range) Time to ROSC was 248 (41-346) seconds compared with 720 (167-720) seconds in the CC+SI group and CCaV group, respectively (=0.0292). There was a 100% higher rate of ROSC in the CC+SI group versus CCaV group, with 10 (83%) versus 5 (42%) achieving ROSC (=0.089), respectively. Piglets in the CC+SI and CCaV groups received intravenous epinephrine boluses to achieve ROSC (8/12 versus 10/12 =0.639). There was a significantly higher minute ventilation in the CC+SI group, which was secondary to a 5-fold increase in the number of inflations per minute and a 1.5-fold increase in tidal volume. Conclusions CC+SI reduced time to ROSC and improved survival compared with using CCaV. CC+SI allowed passive ventilation of the lung while providing chest compressions. This technique warrants further studies to examine the potential to improve outcomes in pediatric patients with cardiac arrest. Registration URL: https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu; Unique identifier: PCTE0000152.

摘要

背景

与心肺复苏期间同步通气的胸外按压(CC+SI)相比,窒息性幼猪心肺复苏期间与异步通气(CCaV)的 CC 会减少自主循环恢复(ROSC)的时间。

方法和结果

将 20-23 天大、体重 6.2-10.2 公斤的仔猪麻醉、插管、仪器化,并暴露于窒息。心搏骤停定义为平均动脉血压<25mmHg 伴心动过缓。心搏骤停后,将仔猪随机分为 CC+SI(n=12)、CCaV(n=12)或假手术(n=8)组。假手术组动物无窒息。连续记录心率、动脉血压、颈动脉血流、脑氧合和呼吸参数。基础参数、窒息时间和程度无差异。ROSC 的中位(四分位距)时间为 248(41-346)秒,CC+SI 组和 CCaV 组分别为 720(167-720)秒(=0.0292)。CC+SI 组的 ROSC 率比 CCaV 组高 100%,分别为 10(83%)和 5(42%)(=0.089)。CC+SI 组和 CCaV 组的仔猪均接受静脉注射肾上腺素以实现 ROSC(8/12 与 10/12=0.639)。CC+SI 组分钟通气量显著增加,这是由于每分钟通气次数增加 5 倍,潮气量增加 1.5 倍所致。

结论

与使用 CCaV 相比,CC+SI 可缩短 ROSC 时间并提高存活率。CC+SI 允许肺被动通气,同时提供胸外按压。这项技术值得进一步研究,以检查其在心脏骤停的儿科患者中提高疗效的潜力。

注册网址

https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu;独特标识符:PCTE0000152。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09e2/8475686/0437d7e9362a/JAH3-10-e019136-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验