• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定环境和土壤因素对硝化抑制剂 DCD 和 DMPP 在土壤中命运的影响。

Determining the influence of environmental and edaphic factors on the fate of the nitrification inhibitors DCD and DMPP in soil.

机构信息

ETSI Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:1202-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.250. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.250
PMID:29929233
Abstract

Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) such as dicyandiamide (DCD) and 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) provide an opportunity to reduce losses of reactive nitrogen (Nr) from agricultural ecosystems. To understand the fate and efficacy of these two inhibitors, laboratory-scale experiments were conducted with C-labelled DCD and DMPP to determine the relative rates of mineralization, recovery in soil extracts and sorption in two agricultural soils with contrasting pH and organic matter content. Concurrently, the net production of soil ammonium and nitrate in soil were determined. Two months after NI addition to soil, significantly greater mineralization of C-DMPP (15.3%) was observed, relative to that of C-DCD (10.7%), and the mineralization of both NIs increased with temperature, regardless of NI and soil type. However, the mineralization of NIs did not appear to have a major influence on their inhibitory effect (as shown by the low mineralization rates and the divergent average half-lives for mineralization and nitrification, which were 454 and 37days, respectively). The nitrification inhibition efficacy of DMPP was more dependent on soil type than that of DCD, although the efficacy of both inhibitors was lower in the more alkaline, low-organic matter soil. Although a greater proportion of DMPP becomes unavailable, possibly due to physico-chemical sorption to soil or microbial immobilization, our results demonstrate the potential of DMPP to achieve higher inhibition rates than DCD in grassland soils. Greater consideration of the interactions between NI type, soil and temperature is required to provide robust and cost-effective advice to farmers on NI use.

摘要

硝化抑制剂(NIs),如双氰胺(DCD)和 3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP),为减少农业生态系统中活性氮(Nr)的损失提供了机会。为了了解这两种抑制剂的命运和效果,我们进行了实验室规模的实验,用 C 标记的 DCD 和 DMPP 来确定在两种具有不同 pH 值和有机质含量的农业土壤中,这两种抑制剂的相对矿化率、土壤提取物中的回收率以及吸附率。同时,还测定了土壤中铵盐和硝酸盐的净生成量。添加 NI 到土壤后两个月,C-DMPP 的矿化率(15.3%)明显高于 C-DCD(10.7%),并且无论 NI 和土壤类型如何,两种 NI 的矿化率都随温度升高而增加。然而,NI 的矿化似乎对其抑制效果没有重大影响(从低矿化率和矿化与硝化的平均半衰期的差异可以看出,矿化和硝化的半衰期分别为 454 和 37 天)。DMPP 的硝化抑制效果比 DCD 更依赖于土壤类型,尽管在碱性和低有机质土壤中,两种抑制剂的效果都较低。尽管可能由于土壤或微生物固定化等物理化学吸附作用,DMPP 有更大比例变得不可用,但我们的结果表明,DMPP 有可能在草地土壤中比 DCD 实现更高的抑制率。需要更充分地考虑 NI 类型、土壤和温度之间的相互作用,以便为农民提供关于 NI 使用的可靠且具有成本效益的建议。

相似文献

1
Determining the influence of environmental and edaphic factors on the fate of the nitrification inhibitors DCD and DMPP in soil.确定环境和土壤因素对硝化抑制剂 DCD 和 DMPP 在土壤中命运的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:1202-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.250. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
2
Mediation of gaseous emissions and improving plant productivity by DCD and DMPP nitrification inhibitors: Meta-analysis of last three decades.通过 DCD 和 DMPP 硝化抑制剂来调解气态排放并提高植物生产力:对过去三十年的元分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(23):64719-64735. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26318-5. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
[Effects of nitrification inhibitors DCD and DMPP on cinnamon soil' s gross nitrogen mineralization and nitrification rates].[硝化抑制剂双氰胺和3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐对褐土总氮矿化和硝化速率的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2012 Jan;23(1):166-72.
4
Comparative effects of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) and dicyandiamide (DCD) on ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in a vegetable soil.3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)和双氰胺(DCD)对蔬菜土壤中氨氧化细菌和古菌的比较影响。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Jan;99(1):477-87. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6026-7. Epub 2014 Aug 31.
5
Measuring Responses of Dicyandiamide-, 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate-, and Allylthiourea-Induced Nitrification Inhibition to Soil Abiotic and Biotic Factors.测定双氰胺、3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐和烯丙基硫脲对土壤非生物和生物因素引起的硝化抑制的响应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;18(13):7130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137130.
6
Efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors (dicyandiamide and 3, 4-dimethypyrazole phosphate) on soil nitrogen transformations and plant productivity: a meta-analysis.两种硝化抑制剂(双氰胺和3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐)对土壤氮转化和植物生产力的影响:一项荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 23;6:22075. doi: 10.1038/srep22075.
7
Effects of the Nitrification Inhibitor 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate on Nitrification and Nitrifiers in Two Contrasting Agricultural Soils.硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐对两种不同农业土壤硝化作用及硝化细菌的影响
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Aug 15;82(17):5236-48. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01031-16. Print 2016 Sep 1.
8
Effects of different nitrification inhibitors on nitrification, maize yield, and nitrogen use efficiency in red soil.不同硝化抑制剂对红壤硝化作用、玉米产量及氮肥利用率的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3953-3960. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.022.
9
Biochar application increases sorption of nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate in soil.生物炭的应用增加了土壤中硝化抑制剂 3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐的吸附。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Apr;25(11):11173-11177. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1658-2. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Biochar counteracts nitrification inhibitor DMPP-mediated negative effect on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth.生物炭可抵消硝化抑制剂 DMPP 对菠菜(Spinacia oleracea L.)生长的负面影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Mar 15;191:110243. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110243. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological Nitrification Inhibitors with Antagonistic and Synergistic Effects on Growth of Ammonia Oxidisers and Soil Nitrification.具有拮抗和协同作用的生物硝化抑制剂对氨氧化菌和土壤硝化的生长。
Microb Ecol. 2024 Nov 20;87(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02456-2.
2
Soil Factors Key to 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate (DMPP) Efficacy: EC and SOC Dominate over Biotic Influences.土壤因素是3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)功效的关键:有效阳离子交换量和土壤有机碳比生物因素的影响更显著。
Microorganisms. 2024 Aug 29;12(9):1787. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091787.
3
Impacts assessment of nitrification inhibitors on U.S. agricultural emissions of reactive nitrogen gases.
硝化抑制剂对美国农业活性氮气体排放的影响评估。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:121043. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121043. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Inhibition profile of three biological nitrification inhibitors and their response to soil pH modification in two contrasting soils.三种生物硝化抑制剂的抑制特性及其对两种不同土壤 pH 值改良的响应。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024 May 14;100(6). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiae072.
5
Reduction of nitrous oxide emission by using stearic acid combined zinc coated urea in silty clay and sandy loam soils under bare and planted conditions.在裸土和种植条件下,通过在粉质粘土和砂壤土中使用硬脂酸复合包膜尿素来减少一氧化二氮排放。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 22;9(12):e22578. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22578. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Uncertainty in non-CO greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility.非 CO2 温室气体减排的不确定性导致全球气候政策可行性存在模糊性。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 2;14(1):2949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38577-4.
7
Syringic acid from rice roots inhibits soil nitrification and NO emission under red and paddy soils but not a calcareous soil.来自水稻根系的丁香酸在红壤和水稻土条件下可抑制土壤硝化作用和一氧化氮排放,但在石灰性土壤中则不然。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Dec 20;13:1099689. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1099689. eCollection 2022.
8
Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Nitrification: Disentangling Processes and Players by Using Synthetic Nitrification Inhibitors.丛枝菌根和硝化作用:利用合成硝化抑制剂解开过程和参与者。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 Oct 26;88(20):e0136922. doi: 10.1128/aem.01369-22. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
Effects of combined nitrification inhibitors on soil nitrification, maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in three agricultural soils.复合硝化抑制剂对三种农业土壤硝化作用、玉米产量和氮肥利用率的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0272935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272935. eCollection 2022.
10
A meta-analysis to examine whether nitrification inhibitors work through selectively inhibiting ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.一项旨在研究硝化抑制剂是否通过选择性抑制氨氧化细菌起作用的荟萃分析。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 19;13:962146. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.962146. eCollection 2022.