Wallace Cara L, Cruz-Oliver Dulce M, Ohs Jennifer E, Hinyard Leslie
1 School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
2 General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Nov;35(11):1369-1376. doi: 10.1177/1049909118783736. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Although practitioners overwhelmingly agree on the importance of advance care planning (ACP) and preparing for the end of life (EOL), the process is fraught with barriers.
The goal of this research was to explore potential connections between providers' own personal experiences and current professional practices in ACP and EOL care.
A cross-sectional survey design, gathering voluntary, anonymous responses from participants between August and December 2016. The survey sought information from providers in 3 distinct areas: (1) personal experiences of loss, (2) personal ACP, and (3) professional practices related to ACP and EOL care.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety health-care professionals (primarily physicians, nurses, and social workers) participated in the survey across a greater, Metropolitan area in the Midwest.
Questions for professional practices were subscales from the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey: Patient- and Family-Centered Communication (PFCC) and Effective Care Delivery (ECD). Questions developed by the research team were evaluated by judges chosen for clinical and/or research expertise.
Numerous connections were found between professionals' histories of loss, personal ACP, and professional practices. For example, both clinicians with personal experience caring for someone who is dying and clinicians who had completed their own ACP scored higher in both PFCC and ECD and were more likely to refer patients to hospice and palliative care.
Results support educational interventions involving opportunities for reflection and completion and communication about ACP. Additionally, educational opportunities for students in health care should focus on incorporating both ACP and greater exposure to hospice and palliative care.
尽管从业者压倒性地认同预先护理计划(ACP)和为生命末期(EOL)做准备的重要性,但这一过程充满了障碍。
本研究的目的是探索提供者自身的个人经历与当前ACP和EOL护理专业实践之间的潜在联系。
横断面调查设计,于2016年8月至12月收集参与者自愿、匿名的回复。该调查从三个不同领域收集提供者的信息:(1)丧失经历,(2)个人ACP,以及(3)与ACP和EOL护理相关的专业实践。
设置/参与者:190名医疗保健专业人员(主要是医生、护士和社会工作者)参与了中西部一个更大的都市地区的调查。
专业实践问题来自《生命末期专业护理人员调查》的子量表:以患者和家庭为中心的沟通(PFCC)和有效护理提供(ECD)。研究团队提出的问题由因临床和/或研究专业知识而挑选的评委进行评估。
在专业人员的丧失经历、个人ACP和专业实践之间发现了许多联系。例如,既有照顾临终患者个人经历的临床医生,又有完成了自己ACP的临床医生,在PFCC和ECD方面得分更高,并且更有可能将患者转诊至临终关怀和姑息治疗机构。
结果支持开展涉及反思机会、完成ACP以及关于ACP沟通的教育干预。此外,医疗保健专业学生的教育机会应侧重于纳入ACP以及增加对临终关怀和姑息治疗的接触。