• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士特定临终专业照护者量表中文版的文化调适与心理计量学评估:一项横断面研究。

Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nurse-specific end-of-life professional caregiver survey: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Wuhan University School of Health Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 16;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00725-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-021-00725-2
PMID:33593352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7885229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses' palliative and hospice care-specific education is associated with the quality of palliative and hospice care that influences health outcomes of patients with life-limiting illnesses and their caregivers. However, China lacks measures available to assess nurses' educational needs in palliative and hospice care. The End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS) is a psychometrically reliable self-reporting scale to measure multidisciplinary professionals' palliative and hospice care educational needs. This study was performed to explore the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the EPCS (EPCS-C) among Chinese nurses.

METHODS

We translated and culturally adapted the EPCS into Chinese based on Beaton and colleagues' instrument adaptation process. A cross-sectional study design was used. We recruited 312 nurses from 1482 nurses in a tertiary hospital in central China using convenience sampling to complete the study. Participants completed the EPCS-C and a demographic questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to test and verify the construct validity of the nurse-specific EPCS-C. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to appraise the reliability of the nurse-specific EPCS-C.

RESULTS

A three-factor structure of EPCS-C was determined, including cultural, ethical, and national values; patient- and family-centered communication; and effective care delivery. The exploratory factor analysis explained 70.82% of the total variances. The 3-factor solution of the nurse-specific EPCS-C had a satisfactory model fit: χ2 = 537.96, χ2/df = 2.96, CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.079, IFI = 0.94, and GFI = 0.86. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the overall questionnaire was 0.96.

CONCLUSIONS

The nurse-specific EPCS-C showed satisfactory reliability and validity to assess nurses' palliative and hospice care educational need. Further research is required to verify the reliability and validity of the EPCS-C in a larger sample, especially the criterion-related validity.

摘要

背景

护士的姑息治疗和临终关怀专业教育与姑息治疗和临终关怀的质量有关,而姑息治疗和临终关怀的质量会影响患有绝症的患者及其护理人员的健康结果。然而,中国缺乏评估护士在姑息治疗和临终关怀方面教育需求的方法。《生命终末期专业护理人员调查问卷》(EPCS)是一种经过心理测量验证的自我报告量表,用于测量多学科专业人员的姑息治疗和临终关怀教育需求。本研究旨在探讨中文版 EPCS(EPCS-C)在中国护士中的心理测量学特性。

方法

我们根据 Beaton 等人的仪器适应过程将 EPCS 翻译成中文并进行文化调适。采用横断面研究设计。我们使用便利抽样法从中国中部一家三级医院的 1482 名护士中招募了 312 名护士来完成这项研究。参与者完成了 EPCS-C 和一份人口统计学问卷。进行探索性和验证性因子分析,以检验和验证护士特异性 EPCS-C 的结构效度。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估护士特异性 EPCS-C 的信度。

结果

确定了 EPCS-C 的三因素结构,包括文化、伦理和国家价值观;以患者和家庭为中心的沟通;以及有效的护理服务提供。探索性因子分析解释了总方差的 70.82%。护士特异性 EPCS-C 的 3 因素解决方案具有令人满意的模型拟合度:χ2=537.96,χ2/df=2.96,CFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.079,IFI=0.94,和 GFI=0.86。问卷的整体克朗巴赫α系数为 0.96。

结论

护士特异性 EPCS-C 具有令人满意的信度和效度,可以评估护士的姑息治疗和临终关怀教育需求。需要进一步研究来验证 EPCS-C 在更大样本中的信度和效度,特别是效标关联效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2938/7885229/c7b1e2074958/12904_2021_725_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2938/7885229/c7b1e2074958/12904_2021_725_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2938/7885229/c7b1e2074958/12904_2021_725_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nurse-specific end-of-life professional caregiver survey: a cross-sectional study.护士特定临终专业照护者量表中文版的文化调适与心理计量学评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 16;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00725-2.
2
Adaptation and psychometric testing of the end-of-life professional caregiver survey in Jamaica.《牙买加终末期专业照护者调查的调适与心理计量学测试》。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 16;23(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09497-2.
3
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey.《临终关怀专业护理人员调查问卷》巴西葡萄牙语版本的翻译、文化调适及验证
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Oct;18(5):569-574. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000993.
4
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
5
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Psychometric properties of the Chinese mainland version of the Palliative Care Spiritual Care Competency Scale (PCSCCS-M) in nursing: a cross-sectional study.简体中文版《安宁疗护灵性照护能力量表》在护理中的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 8;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0409-6.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the spiritual care competency scale in nursing practice: a methodological study.护理实践中精神照护能力量表中文版的心理测量学特性:一项方法学研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e030497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030497.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale.精神健康量表中文版的信度和效度。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;11(3):1058-1067. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-188.
9
Psychometric properties assessment of Chinese version of work readiness scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) and associated factors of work readiness: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版护士工作准备度量表(WRS-GN)的心理计量学特性评估及其工作准备度的相关因素:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
10
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool for family caregivers of cancer patients receiving home-based hospice care.翻译、文化调适及验证中文版照顾者支持需求评估工具,以评估接受居家安宁疗护的癌症病患之家庭照顾者。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 May 19;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00766-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Current situation and influencing factors of palliative care practice ability among oncology nurses: A multicenter cross-sectional study.肿瘤专科护士姑息护理实践能力的现状及影响因素:一项多中心横断面研究
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Dec 12;12(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.12.006. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Self-reported pain assessment, core competence and practice ability for palliative care among Chinese oncology nurses: a multicenter cross-sectional study.中国肿瘤专科护士自我报告的疼痛评估、姑息护理核心能力与实践能力:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Nov 6;23(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02471-1.
3
Self-Assessed Educational Needs of Chinese Pediatric Clinicians Regarding Pediatric Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Investigation.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey.《临终关怀专业护理人员调查问卷》巴西葡萄牙语版本的翻译、文化调适及验证
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Oct;18(5):569-574. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000993.
2
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Connecting Personal Experiences of Loss and Professional Practices in Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Care: A Survey of Providers.
中国儿科临床医生对儿童姑息治疗的自我评估教育需求:一项横断面调查。
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;11(6):730. doi: 10.3390/children11060730.
4
Behaviors and influencing factors of Chinese oncology nurses towards hospice care: a cross-sectional study based on social cognitive theory in 2022.2022 年基于社会认知理论的中国肿瘤护士对临终关怀态度及影响因素的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 23;23(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01385-8.
5
Adaptation and psychometric testing of the end-of-life professional caregiver survey in Jamaica.《牙买加终末期专业照护者调查的调适与心理计量学测试》。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 16;23(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09497-2.
6
Perceived end-of-life educational needs by clinical trials nurses at a comprehensive cancer center.综合癌症中心的临床试验护士所感知到的临终教育需求。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Mar 10;9(6):100052. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Jun.
将丧失的个人经历与预先护理计划及临终关怀中的专业实践相联系:对提供者的一项调查
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Nov;35(11):1369-1376. doi: 10.1177/1049909118783736. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
What are the differences among occupational groups related to their palliative care-specific educational needs and intensity of interprofessional collaboration in long-term care homes?职业群体之间在姑息治疗特定教育需求和长期护理院跨专业合作强度方面有哪些差异?
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 May 18;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0207-y.
5
CARES: AACN's New Competencies and Recommendations for Educating Undergraduate Nursing Students to Improve Palliative Care.CARES:美国危重症护理协会关于培养本科护理学生以改善姑息治疗的新能力与建议
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;32(5):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
6
Comparing Palliative Care in Care Homes Across Europe (PACE): Protocol of a Cross-sectional Study of Deceased Residents in 6 EU Countries.欧洲养老院姑息治疗比较研究(PACE):一项针对6个欧盟国家已故居民的横断面研究方案
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jun 1;17(6):566.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
Development and Psychometric Testing Chinese Version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale, Form B in Nurses and Nursing Students.护士及护生中《弗罗梅尔特临终关怀态度量表B版》中文版的编制与心理测量学测试
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Mar;31(1):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0810-7.
8
Validity of the end-of-life professional caregiver survey to assess for multidisciplinary educational needs.评估多学科教育需求的临终专业照护者调查的有效性。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Apr;15(4):427-31. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0246.
9
The national agenda for quality palliative care: the National Consensus Project and the National Quality Forum.优质姑息治疗国家议程:国家共识项目与国家质量论坛。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jun;33(6):737-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.024.
10
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.自我报告测量工具跨文化适应过程指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.