Mason Martina, Hernández-Sánchez Jules, Vuylsteke Alain, Smith Ian
Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Dec;32(6):2694-2699. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.04.049. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
The aim of this study was to assess the predictive accuracy of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in relation to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) detected by nocturnal oximetry, as well as postoperative outcomes, in a population undergoing cardiac surgery.
A prospective observational cohort study.
The specialist cardiothoracic center at the Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge University Health Partners, United Kingdom.
All adult patients, undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiac valve surgery between March 2013 and July 2014 were included. The authors excluded patients participating in other interventional studies, those who had a tracheostomy before surgery, and those who required emergency surgery or were due to be admitted on the day of surgery.
None.
Cardiac surgical patients were screened for the risk of OSA with the use of STOP-Bang questionnaire. The presence of OSA prior to surgery was assessed with overnight oximetry. The predictive performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC)-receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Multiple-logistic regression models were used to assess for associations between the STOP-Bang scores and postoperative outcomes. The STOP-Bang questionnaire discriminated poorly between mild OSA (AUC-ROC 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.67]) and moderate/severe OSA (AUC-ROC 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.95)]. Accuracy was increased by modifying the cut-off value to 6 or greater, with sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 77%, respectively. A STOP-Bang score indicating the possibility of OSA was not significantly associated with prolonged intensive care unit lengths of stay (hazard ratio [HR] 1.1; 95% CI 0.99-1.19; p = 0.08) or postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.59-1.72; p = 0.98).
In the study population, a STOP-Bang questionnaire score of 3 or greater had limited predictive value for identifying cardiac surgical patients at high risk of OSA. STOP-Bang scores were not significantly associated with worse postoperative outcomes. A STOP-Bang score of 6 or greater could help identify patients in need of a sleep study to confirm the presence of OSA as such patients may be at increased risk of postoperative complications.
本研究旨在评估STOP-Bang问卷对通过夜间血氧饱和度测定法检测出的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的预测准确性,以及对接受心脏手术患者术后结局的预测准确性。
一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
英国剑桥大学健康伙伴皇家帕普沃思医院的心胸专科中心。
纳入2013年3月至2014年7月期间所有接受择期冠状动脉搭桥术(无论是否进行心脏瓣膜手术)的成年患者。作者排除了参与其他干预性研究的患者、术前已行气管切开术的患者、需要急诊手术或手术当天即将入院的患者。
无。
使用STOP-Bang问卷对心脏手术患者进行OSA风险筛查。术前通过夜间血氧饱和度测定法评估OSA的存在情况。通过计算敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值以及曲线下面积(AUC)-受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)来评估STOP-Bang问卷的预测性能。使用多因素逻辑回归模型评估STOP-Bang评分与术后结局之间的关联。STOP-Bang问卷对轻度OSA(AUC-ROC 0.57 [95%置信区间(CI)0.47 - 0.67])和中度/重度OSA(AUC-ROC 0.82 [95% CI 0.69 - 0.95])的区分能力较差。将临界值修改为6分及以上可提高准确性,敏感度和特异度分别为75%和77%。提示OSA可能性的STOP-Bang评分与重症监护病房住院时间延长(风险比[HR] 1.1;95% CI 0.99 - 1.19;p = 0.08)或术后并发症(比值比[OR] 1.0;95% CI 0.59 - 1.72;p = 0.98)无显著关联。
在本研究人群中,STOP-Bang问卷评分为3分及以上对识别有高OSA风险的心脏手术患者的预测价值有限。STOP-Bang评分与较差的术后结局无显著关联。STOP-Bang评分为6分及以上有助于识别需要进行睡眠研究以确认OSA存在的患者,因为这类患者术后并发症风险可能增加。