Avila Andrea, Claes Jomme, Goetschalckx Kaatje, Buys Roselien, Azzawi May, Vanhees Luc, Cornelissen Véronique
Department of Rehabilitation Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 22;20(6):e225. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9943.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an essential part of contemporary coronary heart disease management. However, patients exiting a center-based CR program have difficulty retaining its benefits.
We aimed to evaluate the added benefit of a home-based CR program with telemonitoring guidance on physical fitness in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) completing a phase II ambulatory CR program and to compare the effectiveness of this program in a prolonged center-based CR intervention by means of a randomized controlled trial.
Between February 2014 and August 2016, 90 CAD patients (unblinded, mean age 61.2 years, SD 7.6; 80/90, 89.0% males; mean height 1.73 m, SD 0.7; mean weight 82.9 kg, SD 13; mean body mass index 27.5 kg/m, SD 3.4) who successfully completed a 3-month ambulatory CR program were randomly allocated to one of three groups: home-based (30), center-based (30), or control group (30) on a 1:1:1 basis. Home-based patients received a home-based exercise intervention with telemonitoring guidance consisting of weekly emails or phone calls; center-based patients continued the standard in-hospital CR, and control group patients received the usual care including the advice to remain physically active. All the patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing for assessment of their peak oxygen uptake (VO P) at baseline and after a 12-week intervention period. Secondary outcomes included physical activity behavior, anthropometric characteristics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and quality of life.
Following 12 weeks of intervention, the increase in VO P was larger in the center-based (P=.03) and home-based (P=.04) groups than in the control group. In addition, oxygen uptake at the first (P-interaction=.03) and second (P-interaction=.03) ventilatory thresholds increased significantly more in the home-based group than in the center-based group. No significant changes were observed in the secondary outcomes.
Adding a home-based exercise program with telemonitoring guidance following completion of a phase II ambulatory CR program results in further improvement of physical fitness and is equally as effective as prolonging a center-based CR in patients with CAD.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70CBkSURj).
心脏康复(CR)是当代冠心病管理的重要组成部分。然而,完成基于中心的CR项目的患者难以维持其益处。
我们旨在评估在完成II期门诊CR项目的冠心病(CAD)患者中,基于家庭的CR项目并通过远程监测指导对体能的附加益处,并通过随机对照试验比较该项目与延长的基于中心的CR干预的有效性。
在2014年2月至2016年8月期间,90例成功完成3个月门诊CR项目的CAD患者(非盲法,平均年龄61.2岁,标准差7.6;80/90,89.0%为男性;平均身高1.73m,标准差0.7;平均体重82.9kg,标准差13;平均体重指数27.5kg/m,标准差3.4)被按1:1:1随机分配到三组之一:基于家庭组(30例)、基于中心组(30例)或对照组(30例)。基于家庭组的患者接受有远程监测指导的家庭运动干预,包括每周电子邮件或电话;基于中心组的患者继续标准的院内CR,对照组患者接受常规护理,包括保持身体活动的建议。所有患者在基线和12周干预期后均接受心肺运动测试以评估其峰值摄氧量(VO₂peak)。次要结局包括身体活动行为、人体测量特征、传统心血管危险因素和生活质量。
干预12周后,基于中心组(P = 0.03)和基于家庭组(P = 0.04)的VO₂peak增加幅度大于对照组。此外,基于家庭组在第一(P交互作用 = 0.03)和第二(P交互作用 = 0.03)通气阈值时的摄氧量增加显著大于基于中心组。次要结局未观察到显著变化。
在完成II期门诊CR项目后增加有远程监测指导的家庭运动项目可进一步改善体能,并且在CAD患者中与延长基于中心的CR同样有效。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/70CBkSURj)