De Bruijn-Geraets Daisy P, van Eijk-Hustings Yvonne J L, Bessems-Beks Monique C M, Essers Brigitte A B, Dirksen Carmen D, Vrijhoef Hubertus Johannes Maria
Department of Patient and Care, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;8(6):e019962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019962.
To evaluate the effects of granting legal full practice authority (FPA) to nurse practitioners (NP) and physician assistants (PA) regarding the performance of specified reserved medical procedures and to support governmental decision-making.
Nationwide mixed methods design with triangulation of quantitative (Pre-post test design) and qualitative data (expert interviews and focus groups).
Surveys focused on the performance of the procedures (monthly number, authorisation mode, consultations and procedural time) and legal cross-compliance requirements (adherence with protocols, competence). Interviews focused on competence, knowledge, skills, responsibilities, routine behaviour, NP/PA role, acceptance, organisational structure, collaboration, consultation, NP/PA positioning, adherence with protocols and resources. Data collection took place between 2011 and 2015.
Quantitative data included 1251 NPs, 798 PAs and 504 physicians. Besides, expert interviews with 33 healthcare providers and 28 key stakeholders, and 5 focus groups (31 healthcare providers) were held.After obtaining FPA, the proportion of NPs and PAs performing reserved procedures increased from 77% to 85% and from 86% to 93%, respectively; the proportion of procedures performed on own authority increased from 63% to 76% for NPs and from 67% to 71% for PAs. The mean number of monthly contacts between NPs/PAs and physicians about procedures decreased (from 81 to 49 and from 107 to 54, respectively), as did the mean duration in minutes (from 9.9 to 8.6 and from 8.8 to 7.4, respectively). Utilisation of FPA was dependent on the setting, as scepticism of physicians and medical boards hampered full implementation. Legal cross-compliance requirements were mostly fulfilled.
Informal practice was legalised. The opportunities to independently perform catheterisations, injections, prescribing, punctures and small surgical procedures were highly used. Care processes were organised more efficiently, services were performed by the most appropriate healthcare provider and conditions were met. This led to the recommendation to continue with FPA.
评估赋予执业护士(NP)和医师助理(PA)法定的完全执业权限(FPA)对其实施特定保留医疗程序的影响,并为政府决策提供支持。
采用全国性混合方法设计,对定量数据(前后测试设计)和定性数据(专家访谈和焦点小组)进行三角测量。
调查聚焦于程序的实施情况(每月数量、授权模式、会诊和程序时间)以及法律合规性要求(遵守协议、能力)。访谈聚焦于能力、知识、技能、职责、日常行为、NP/PA角色、接受度、组织结构、协作、会诊、NP/PA定位、遵守协议和资源。数据收集于2011年至2015年期间进行。
定量数据包括1251名执业护士、798名医师助理和504名医生。此外,还对33名医疗服务提供者和28名关键利益相关者进行了专家访谈,并开展了5个焦点小组(31名医疗服务提供者)。获得FPA后,实施保留程序的执业护士和医师助理的比例分别从77%增至85%,从86%增至93%;执业护士和医师助理自行实施程序的比例分别从63%增至76%,从67%增至71%。执业护士/医师助理与医生就程序进行的每月平均联系次数减少(分别从81次降至49次,从107次降至54次),平均时长(分钟)也减少(分别从9.9分钟降至8.6分钟,从8.8分钟降至7.4分钟)。FPA的使用取决于具体情况,因为医生和医疗委员会的怀疑阻碍了全面实施。法律合规性要求大多得到满足。
非正式执业合法化。独立进行导管插入术、注射、开处方、穿刺和小型外科手术的机会得到了高度利用。护理流程组织得更高效,服务由最合适的医疗服务提供者执行,条件得到满足。由此建议继续推行FPA。