Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):491-503. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.06.
Recent health system shocks such as the Ebola outbreak of 2014-2016 and the global financial crisis of 2008 have generated global health interest in the concept of resilience. The concept is however not new, and has been applied to other sectors for a longer period of time. We conducted a review of empirical literature from both the health and other sectors to synthesize evidence on organizational resilience.
We systematically searched for literature in PubMed, Econlit, EBSCOHOST databases, google, and Google Scholar and manually searched the reference lists of selected papers. We identified 34 papers that met our inclusion criteria. We analysed data from the selected papers by thematic review.
Resilience was generally taken to mean a system's ability to continue to meet its objectives in the face of challenges. The concepts of resilience that were used in the selected papers emphasized not just a system's capacity to withstand shocks, but also to adapt and transform. The resilience of organizations was influenced by the following factors: Material resources, preparedness and planning, information management, collateral pathways and redundancy, governance processes, leadership practices, organizational culture, human capital, social networks and collaboration.
A common theme across the selected papers is the recognition of resilience as an emergent property of complex adaptive systems. Resilience is both a function of planning for and preparing for future crisis (planned resilience), and adapting to chronic stresses and acute shocks (adaptive resilience). Beyond resilience to acute shocks, the resilience of health systems to routine and chronic stress (everyday resilience) is also key. Health system software is as, if not more important, as its hardware in nurturing health system resilience.
2014-2016 年埃博拉疫情和 2008 年全球金融危机等近期卫生系统冲击引起了全球对恢复力概念的关注。然而,这一概念并非新生事物,它在其他领域已经应用了更长的时间。我们对来自卫生和其他领域的实证文献进行了综述,以综合关于组织恢复力的证据。
我们系统地在 PubMed、Econlit、EBSCOHOST 数据库、google 和 Google Scholar 中进行文献检索,并手动检索选定论文的参考文献列表。我们确定了 34 篇符合纳入标准的论文。我们通过主题审查分析了选定论文中的数据。
恢复力通常被理解为系统在面临挑战时继续实现其目标的能力。所选论文中使用的恢复力概念不仅强调了系统承受冲击的能力,还强调了适应和转变的能力。组织的恢复力受到以下因素的影响:物质资源、准备和规划、信息管理、附属途径和冗余、治理流程、领导实践、组织文化、人力资本、社会网络和协作。
所选论文的一个共同主题是认识到恢复力是复杂自适应系统的一种涌现特性。恢复力既是为未来危机做计划和准备的函数(计划性恢复力),也是适应慢性压力和急性冲击的函数(适应性恢复力)。除了对急性冲击的恢复力外,卫生系统对日常和慢性压力(日常恢复力)的恢复力也很关键。卫生系统软件在培育卫生系统恢复力方面与硬件一样重要,如果不是更重要的话。