Al-Qurayshi Zaid, Shama Mohamed A, Randolph Gregory W, Kandil Emad
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Department of SurgerySchool of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017 May;24(5):221-226. doi: 10.1530/ERC-16-0509. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with minimal extrathyroidal extension (MEE) is classified as stage III regardless of the tumor size. In this study, we aim to examine the effect of MEE on the overall survival and management of this population. A retrospective cohort study was performed, which utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB), 2004-2012. The study population included patients, aged ≥ 45 years, who underwent surgery for DTC (pT3N0M0) with MEE compared to that in patients with pT2N0M0. A total of 9556 patients were included. These were divided into four groups, 4410 patients with pT2N0M0 (Group 1: T ≤ 4 cm without MEE), 3274 with pT3N0M0 (Group 2: T ≤ 4 cm with MEE), 447 with pT3N0M0 (Group 3: T > 4 cm with MEE) and 1430 patients with pT3N0M0 without MEE (Group 4: T > 4 cm without MEE). Median follow-up time was 46.7 months (interquartile range: 27.8-72.1). Patients in Group 2 (T ≤ 4 cm with MEE) had no significant worse survival compared to patients in Group 1 (T ≤ 4 cm without MEE) ( = 0.85), whereas Groups 3 and 4 (T > 4 cm), both had significantly lower survival ( < 0.001) with no difference between the two groups. Total thyroidectomy was associated with improved overall survival compared to that in lobectomy in Group 4 (T > 4 cm without MEE). Radioiodine utilization was associated with improved survival only with tumors larger than 4 cm with or without MEE. In DTC patients aged older than 45 years of age with tumor size less than 4 cm, MEE has no survival significance. Tumor size is an independent prognostic marker regardless of MEE status. Our data support re-evaluation of the current staging system.
甲状腺外扩展极小(MEE)的分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)无论肿瘤大小均被归类为III期。在本研究中,我们旨在研究MEE对该人群总生存期及治疗的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,利用了2004 - 2012年的国家癌症数据库(NCDB)。研究人群包括年龄≥45岁、因MEE的DTC(pT3N0M0)接受手术的患者,并与pT2N0M0患者进行比较。共纳入9556例患者。这些患者被分为四组,4410例pT2N0M0患者(第1组:T≤4 cm且无MEE),3274例pT3N0M0患者(第2组:T≤4 cm且有MEE),447例pT3N0M0患者(第3组:T>4 cm且有MEE)和1430例pT3N0M0无MEE患者(第4组:T>4 cm且无MEE)。中位随访时间为46.7个月(四分位间距:27.8 - 72.1)。第2组(T≤4 cm且有MEE)患者的生存期与第1组(T≤4 cm且无MEE)患者相比无显著更差(=0.85),而第3组和第4组(T>4 cm)的生存期均显著更低(<0.001),两组之间无差异。在第4组(T>4 cm且无MEE)中,与甲状腺叶切除术相比,全甲状腺切除术与总生存期改善相关。仅对于肿瘤大小大于4 cm且有或无MEE的患者,放射性碘治疗与生存期改善相关。在年龄大于45岁、肿瘤大小小于4 cm的DTC患者中,MEE对生存期无意义。无论MEE状态如何,肿瘤大小都是一个独立的预后标志物。我们的数据支持对当前分期系统进行重新评估。