Hwang Misun, Marovich Ryan, Shin Samuel S, Chi David, Branstetter Barton F
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA.
J Otol. 2015 Mar;10(1):13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
Enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), the most frequent identifiable cause of congenital hearing loss, is evaluated with high-definition multi-detector CT in the axial plane. Our purpose was to determine which reformatted CT measurements are most reproducible. Seven multiplanar reformatted images were created for each of the 64 temporal bones in patients with EVA. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess inter-observer variability, and both linear regression and ROC analyses were used to compare the measurements with severity of hearing loss, as assessed by pure tone audiometry. All seven measurements had excellent inter-observer variability, with average-measure ICC ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. There was no statistically significant correlation between the radiologic degree of aqueduct enlargement and severity of hearing loss using any of the seven measurements; ROC analyses revealed areas under the curves ranging from 0.57 to 0.73. Optimal accuracy was obtained with a threshold of 1.75 mm as measured at the aqueductal aperture in the Pöschl plane, with sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.63. Although the radiologic measurement may not serve as a reliable tool for assessing severity of EVA, Pöschl plane reformatting has proven to be better than conventional axial acquisition plane for identifying patients with clinically significant hearing loss.
扩大的前庭导水管(EVA)是先天性听力损失最常见的可识别病因,通过轴向平面的高分辨率多探测器CT进行评估。我们的目的是确定哪些重新格式化的CT测量值最具可重复性。为EVA患者的64块颞骨中的每一块创建了7个多平面重新格式化图像。组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估观察者间的变异性,线性回归和ROC分析均用于将测量值与通过纯音听力测定评估的听力损失严重程度进行比较。所有7项测量的观察者间变异性都很好,平均测量ICC范围为0.92至0.98。使用这7项测量中的任何一项,导水管扩大的放射学程度与听力损失严重程度之间均无统计学上的显著相关性;ROC分析显示曲线下面积范围为0.57至0.73。在Pöschl平面的导水管口处测量,阈值为1.75mm时可获得最佳准确性,敏感性为0.75,特异性为0.63。尽管放射学测量可能不是评估EVA严重程度的可靠工具,但已证明Pöschl平面重新格式化在识别具有临床显著听力损失的患者方面优于传统的轴向采集平面。