• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《健康促进生活型态量表(HELP-T)之台湾中文版的发展》。

Development of the Taiwanese version of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP-T).

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Occupational Therapy and.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199255. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199255
PMID:29944692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6019258/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a Taiwanese version of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP-T) for community-dwelling older Taiwanese adults (≥ 55 years).

METHODS

The original Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) is a 56-item self-report questionnaire measuring various aspects of health-related lifestyles in older adults. The standard cultural-adaptation procedure was used for questionnaire translation and modification. A field test was conducted for culturally specific item selection, rating-scale analysis, and psychometric validation of the HELP-T in a sample of 274 community-dwelling older adults via classical test theory.

RESULTS

The 59-item HELP-T is culturally adapted from the original 56-item HELP. The original 6-point rating scale was modified to a 3-point scale for easy use by Taiwanese older adults. The HELP-T had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82). The test-retest reliability for the total score was high (0.92), and moderate to high (range: 0.57-0.92) for subscales. The construct validity was supported by the significant correlations between each subscale and the total score (Spearman's rho = 0.41-0.67, p < 0.0001) and by the ability of the scores to significantly discriminate between participants with different levels of self-rated health (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The HELP-T is a suitable clinical tool for assessing and monitoring lifestyle risk factors, establishing client-centered lifestyle intervention goals, and determining the outcomes of lifestyle interventions.

摘要

目的

为台湾地区的社区居住的老年成年人(≥55 岁)开发和验证健康促进生活方式量表(HELP-T)的台湾版本。

方法

原始的健康促进生活方式量表(HELP)是一个 56 项的自我报告问卷,用于衡量老年人健康相关生活方式的各个方面。使用标准的文化适应程序对问卷进行翻译和修改。通过经典测试理论,对 274 名社区居住的老年人进行了现场测试,以选择具有文化特异性的项目、评定量表分析和 HELP-T 的心理测量验证。

结果

59 项的 HELP-T 是从原始的 56 项 HELP 改编而来。原始的 6 点评分量表被修改为 3 点量表,以方便台湾老年人使用。HELP-T 具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.82)。总分的重测信度较高(0.92),分量表的重测信度为中等至较高(范围:0.57-0.92)。各分量表与总分之间的显著相关性(Spearman's rho = 0.41-0.67,p < 0.0001)以及分数在不同自我报告健康水平的参与者之间的区分能力(p = 0.0001)支持了结构有效性。

结论

HELP-T 是一种适合评估和监测生活方式风险因素、建立以客户为中心的生活方式干预目标以及确定生活方式干预结果的临床工具。

相似文献

1
Development of the Taiwanese version of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP-T).《健康促进生活型态量表(HELP-T)之台湾中文版的发展》。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199255. eCollection 2018.
2
Developing and validating the Taiwan version of the meaningful activity participation assessment (T-MAPA) with Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析方法研发与验证具文化适宜性的 meaningful activity participation assessment(T-MAPA)繁体中文版。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03839-9.
3
Reliability of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile-Screener (HELP-Screener).健康促进生活方式量表筛查版(HELP-Screener)的信度。
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):e6-10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005934.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Taiwan-Chinese version of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.《Cumberland 踝关节不稳定工具台湾中文版的跨文化调适、信度和效度》。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Mar;44(5):781-787. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1774928. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
5
Promoting healthy lifestyles with aging: development and validation of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) using the Rasch measurement model.促进老年人的健康生活方式:使用 Rasch 测量模型开发和验证健康促进生活方式量表 (HELP)。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):786-95. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09088.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Type 2 Diabetes and Health Promotion Scale (T2DHPS): a diabetes-specific measure of lifestyle.2型糖尿病与健康促进量表(T2DHPS)波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一种针对糖尿病的生活方式测量工具。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Sep;29(3):603-12. doi: 10.1111/scs.12181. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
7
Development of the Hausa version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in mixed urban and rural patients with chronic low back pain.《疼痛灾难化量表豪萨语版的研制:混合城乡慢性腰痛患者的翻译、跨文化调适及心理计量学评估》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01644-1.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire in Italian subjects with painful knee osteoarthritis.弗里曼特尔膝关节认知问卷在意大利疼痛性膝骨关节炎患者中的跨文化调适、信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 7;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01754-4.
9
A Danish version of the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14): translation and cross-cultural adaptation.丹麦版口腔健康影响量表-14(OHIP-14):翻译与跨文化调适。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01242-z.
10
Cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International to assess concerns about falls among Hungarian community-living older people.国际跌倒效能量表在匈牙利社区居住老年人中对跌倒担忧评估的跨文化验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(25):3070-3075. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1366555. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Food Away From Home and Self-Perceived Gastrointestinal Health.外出就餐与自我认知的胃肠道健康
Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 26;8:741647. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.741647. eCollection 2021.
2
The effectiveness of a health promotion intervention on the meaning of life, positive beliefs, and well-being among undergraduate nursing students: One-group experimental study.一项健康促进干预措施对本科护理专业学生生命意义、积极信念和幸福感的有效性:单组实验研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19470. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019470.
3
Simulated directed-learning in life-education intervention on the meaning of life, positive beliefs, and well-being among nursing students: A Quasi-experimental study.模拟定向学习在护理专业学生生命教育干预中对生命意义、积极信念和幸福感的影响:一项准实验研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(27):e16330. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016330.

本文引用的文献

1
Successful Aging 2.0: Conceptual Expansions for the 21st Century.《成功老龄化2.0:21世纪的概念拓展》
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Jul;70(4):593-6. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv025. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
2
Lifestyle behaviors and self-rated health: the living for health program.生活方式行为与自评健康:健康生活计划
J Environ Public Health. 2014;2014:315042. doi: 10.1155/2014/315042. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Reliability of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile-Screener (HELP-Screener).健康促进生活方式量表筛查版(HELP-Screener)的信度。
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):e6-10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005934.
4
Promoting healthy lifestyles with aging: development and validation of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) using the Rasch measurement model.促进老年人的健康生活方式:使用 Rasch 测量模型开发和验证健康促进生活方式量表 (HELP)。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):786-95. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09088.
5
Older adults prefer less choice than young adults.老年人比年轻人更喜欢较少的选择。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):671-5. doi: 10.1037/a0012772.
6
James Fries: healthy aging pioneer.詹姆斯·弗里斯:健康老龄化先驱。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jul;98(7):1163-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.135731. Epub 2008 May 29.
7
Nutrient intake and psychological health in an elderly Chinese population.中国老年人群的营养摄入与心理健康
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;21(11):1036-43. doi: 10.1002/gps.1603.
8
Determinants of self-perceived health.自我认知健康的决定因素。
Health Rep. 2001 Dec;13(1):35-52.
9
The meaning of healthy and not healthy: older African Americans and whites with chronic illness.健康与不健康的含义:患有慢性病的老年非裔美国人和白人。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2000;15(2):139-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1006794215571.
10
Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. 1980.衰老、自然死亡与发病期的压缩。1980年。
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(3):245-50.