• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用层次分析法对韩国灾难精神科援助团队关键要素的决策制定

Decision Making Regarding Key Elements of Korean Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Teams Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

作者信息

Jo Sun-Jin, Na Kyoung-Sae, Park Joo Eon, Lee Myung-Soo

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Jul;15(7):663-669. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.01.13. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.30773/pi.2018.01.13
PMID:29945429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6056699/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the key components of Korean disaster psychiatric assistant teams (K-DPATs), to set up new mental health service providing system for the disaster victims.

METHODS

We conducted an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) involving disaster mental health experts, using a pairwise comparison questionnaire to compare the relative importance of the key components of the Korean disaster mental health response system. In total, 41 experts completed the first online survey; of these, 36 completed the second survey. Ten experts participated in panel meetings and discussed the results of the survey and AHP process.

RESULTS

It was agreed that K-DPATs should be independent of the existing mental health system (70.1%), funding for K-DPATs should be provided by the Ministry of Public Safety, and the system should be managed by the Ministry of Health (65.8%). Experts shared the view that K-DPAT leaders would be suitable key decision makers for all types of disaster, with the exception of those involving infectious diseases.

CONCLUSION

K-DPAT, a new model for disaster mental health response systems could improve the insufficiency of the current system, address problems such as fragmentation, and fulfill disaster victims' unmet need for early professional intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定韩国灾难心理援助团队(K-DPATs)的关键组成部分,为灾难受害者建立新的心理健康服务提供系统。

方法

我们对灾难心理健康专家进行了层次分析法(AHP),使用成对比较问卷来比较韩国灾难心理健康应对系统关键组成部分的相对重要性。共有41名专家完成了第一次在线调查;其中36名完成了第二次调查。10名专家参加了小组会议,讨论了调查结果和层次分析法过程。

结果

大家一致认为,K-DPATs应独立于现有的心理健康系统(70.1%),K-DPATs的资金应由公共安全部提供,该系统应由卫生部管理(65.8%)。专家们一致认为,除了涉及传染病的灾难外,K-DPAT负责人将是各类灾难的合适关键决策者。

结论

K-DPAT作为灾难心理健康应对系统的新模式,可以改善当前系统的不足,解决碎片化等问题,并满足灾难受害者对早期专业干预未得到满足的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/6056699/16498f2dcc8e/pi-2018-01-13f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/6056699/02c2c3afe80c/pi-2018-01-13f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/6056699/16498f2dcc8e/pi-2018-01-13f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/6056699/02c2c3afe80c/pi-2018-01-13f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/6056699/16498f2dcc8e/pi-2018-01-13f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Decision Making Regarding Key Elements of Korean Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Teams Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.运用层次分析法对韩国灾难精神科援助团队关键要素的决策制定
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Jul;15(7):663-669. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.01.13. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Acute Mental Health Needs Duration during Major Disasters: A Phenomenological Experience of Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Teams (DPATs) in Japan.重大灾害期间的急性心理健康需求:日本灾害精神科援助小组(DPAT)的现象学体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 27;17(5):1530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051530.
3
Acute-Stage Mental Health Symptoms by Natural Disaster Type: Consultations of Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Teams (DPATs) in Japan.按自然灾害类型划分的急性期心理健康症状:日本灾害精神科援助团队(DPATs)的会诊情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 25;18(23):12409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312409.
4
Consideration of Medical and Public Health Coordination - Experience from the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan Earthquake.医疗与公共卫生协调的考虑——来自日本 2016 年熊本地震的经验。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Apr;34(2):149-154. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19000177. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
5
Policy development in disaster preparedness and management: lessons learned from the January 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India.灾害防备与管理中的政策制定:从2001年印度古吉拉特邦地震中汲取的经验教训。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):372-84. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001345.
6
Systematic assessment of benefits and risks: study protocol for a multi-criteria decision analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for comparative effectiveness research.效益与风险的系统评估:使用层次分析法进行多标准决策分析以开展比较效果研究的研究方案
F1000Res. 2013 Jul 24;2:160. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-160.v1. eCollection 2013.
7
Strategic Priorities to Improve Effectiveness of Anti-smoking Interventions for the Korean Military: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.提高韩国军队戒烟干预效果的战略重点:层次分析法的应用
Mil Med. 2018 Jul 1;183(7-8):e223-e230. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx027.
8
Serious Games as a Validation Tool for PREDIS: A Decision Support System for Disaster Management.严肃游戏作为 PREDIS 的验证工具:灾难管理决策支持系统。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16584. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416584.
9
Evaluation of the quality of health and safety services with SERVPERF and multi-attribute decision-making methods.运用 SERVPERF 和多属性决策方法评价健康与安全服务质量。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2216-2226. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1984711. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care-Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey.开发以患者为中心的痴呆症护理为导向的定量偏好工具 - 第 2 阶段:形成性定性研究的见解,以设计和预测试痴呆症友好的层次分析法调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;19(14):8554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148554.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Mental Health Needs Duration during Major Disasters: A Phenomenological Experience of Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Teams (DPATs) in Japan.重大灾害期间的急性心理健康需求:日本灾害精神科援助小组(DPAT)的现象学体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 27;17(5):1530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051530.

本文引用的文献

1
The inter-agency standing committee (IASC) guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in emergency settings: a critique.机构间常设委员会(IASC)关于紧急情况下心理健康和社会心理支持(MHPSS)的准则:批判。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;34(6):604-612. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2147420. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
2
Community mental health status six months after the Sewol ferry disaster in Ansan, Korea.韩国安山市“岁月号”客轮灾难发生六个月后的社区心理健康状况。
Epidemiol Health. 2015 Oct 23;37:e2015046. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2015046. eCollection 2015.
3
A systemic analysis of South Korea Sewol ferry accident - Striking a balance between learning and accountability.
韩国“岁月号”渡轮事故的系统分析——在吸取教训与追究责任之间寻求平衡。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt B):504-516. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
4
Development of the Japanese National Disaster Medical System and Experiences during the Great East Japan Earthquake.日本国家灾害医疗系统的发展及东日本大地震期间的经验
Yonago Acta Med. 2015 Jun;58(2):53-61. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Application of Behavioral Theories to Disaster and Emergency Health Preparedness: A Systematic Review.行为理论在灾害与应急卫生准备中的应用:一项系统综述。
PLoS Curr. 2015 Jul 1;7:ecurrents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829.
6
Developing a Consensus-based Definition of "Kokoro-no Care" or Mental Health Services and Psychosocial Support: Drawing from Experiences of Mental Health Professionals Who Responded to the Great East Japan Earthquake.基于共识制定“心灵关怀”或心理健康服务及社会心理支持的定义:借鉴应对东日本大地震的心理健康专业人员的经验。
PLoS Curr. 2015 Jan 29;7:ecurrents.dis.cfcbaf509711641ab5951535851e572e. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.cfcbaf509711641ab5951535851e572e.
7
Progress and challenges of disaster health management in China: a scoping review.中国灾害卫生管理的进展与挑战:一项范围综述
Glob Health Action. 2014 Sep 10;7:24986. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24986. eCollection 2014.
8
The Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami, and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: a triple disaster affecting the mental health of the country.日本东北大地震、海啸与福岛第一核电站事故:三重灾害影响国家心理健康。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;36(3):351-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
9
Unraveling the complexities of disaster management: a framework for critical social infrastructure to promote population health and resilience.解析灾难管理的复杂性:促进人口健康和韧性的关键社会基础设施框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.040. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
10
Post-disaster psychosocial services across Europe: the TENTS project.欧洲灾后心理社会服务:TENTS 项目。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Nov;75(9):1708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Jul 14.