Suppr超能文献

从 bereaved 家庭成员的角度看临终关怀过程及死亡前后结果量表的有效性和可靠性

Validity and Reliability of the Dying Care Process and Outcome Scales Before and After Death From the Bereaved Family Members' Perspective.

作者信息

Kanno Yusuke, Sato Kazuki, Shimizu Megumi, Funamizu Yuko, Andoh Hideaki, Kishino Megumi, Senaga Tomomi, Takahashi Tetsu, Miyashita Mitsunori

机构信息

1 Division of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.

2 Division of Psycho-Oncology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Feb;36(2):130-137. doi: 10.1177/1049909118785178. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

: There are no instruments evaluating the processes and outcomes of dying care right before and after death. Therefore, we developed and examined the validity and reliability of 2 scales for evaluating dying care processes and outcomes before and after death.

METHODS

: A cross-sectional, anonymous questionnaire was administered to bereaved family members of patients with cancer who had died in 5 facilities. We evaluated the Dying Care Process Scale for Bereaved Family Members (DPS-B) and the Dying Care Outcome Scale for Bereaved Family Members (DOS-B) with 345 bereaved family members.

RESULTS

: A factor analysis revealed that DPS-B and DOS-B each consisted of 4 subscales. For the DPS-B, they were "symptom management," "respect for the patient's dignity before and after death," "explanation to the family," and "family care." For the DOS-B, they were "peaceful dying process for the patient," "being respected as a person before and after death," "good relationship between the patient and family," and "peaceful dying process for the family." Both DPS-B and DOS-B had sufficient convergent and discriminative validity, sufficient internal consistency (DPS-B: α = 0.91 and subscales' αs = 0.78-0.91; DOS-B: α = 0.91 and subscales' αs = 0.78-0.94), and sufficient test-retest reliability (DPS-B: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of total score = 0.79 and subscales = 0.55-0.79; DOS-B: ICC of total score = 0.88 and subscales = 0.70-0.88).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

: Both DPS-B and DOS-B are valid and reliable scales for evaluating the dying care processes and outcomes before and after death from the bereaved family members' perspectives.

摘要

目的

目前尚无评估死亡前后临终关怀过程及结果的工具。因此,我们开发并检验了2个用于评估死亡前后临终关怀过程及结果的量表的有效性和可靠性。

方法

对在5家机构去世的癌症患者的 bereaved family members 进行了一项横断面、匿名问卷调查。我们用345名bereaved family members对丧亲家属临终关怀过程量表(DPS-B)和丧亲家属临终关怀结果量表(DOS-B)进行了评估。

结果

因素分析显示,DPS-B和DOS-B均由4个分量表组成。对于DPS-B,它们是“症状管理”、“对患者生前及死后尊严的尊重”、“向家属解释”和“家属关怀”。对于DOS-B,它们是“患者平静的死亡过程”、“生前及死后作为一个人受到尊重”、“患者与家属之间的良好关系”和“家属平静的死亡过程”。DPS-B和DOS-B均具有足够的收敛效度和区分效度、足够的内部一致性(DPS-B:α = 0.91,各分量表α值 = 0.78 - 0.91;DOS-B:α = 0.91,各分量表α值 = 0.78 - 0.94)以及足够的重测信度(DPS-B:总分的组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.79,各分量表 = 0.55 - 0.79;DOS-B:总分的ICC = 0.88,各分量表 = 0.70 - 0.88)。

结果的意义

从bereaved family members的角度来看,DPS-B和DOS-B都是评估死亡前后临终关怀过程及结果的有效且可靠的量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验