Kanno Yusuke, Sato Kazuki, Shimizu Megumi, Funamizu Yuko, Andoh Hideaki, Kishino Megumi, Senaga Tomomi, Takahashi Tetsu, Miyashita Mitsunori
1 Division of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
2 Division of Psycho-Oncology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Feb;36(2):130-137. doi: 10.1177/1049909118785178. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
: There are no instruments evaluating the processes and outcomes of dying care right before and after death. Therefore, we developed and examined the validity and reliability of 2 scales for evaluating dying care processes and outcomes before and after death.
: A cross-sectional, anonymous questionnaire was administered to bereaved family members of patients with cancer who had died in 5 facilities. We evaluated the Dying Care Process Scale for Bereaved Family Members (DPS-B) and the Dying Care Outcome Scale for Bereaved Family Members (DOS-B) with 345 bereaved family members.
: A factor analysis revealed that DPS-B and DOS-B each consisted of 4 subscales. For the DPS-B, they were "symptom management," "respect for the patient's dignity before and after death," "explanation to the family," and "family care." For the DOS-B, they were "peaceful dying process for the patient," "being respected as a person before and after death," "good relationship between the patient and family," and "peaceful dying process for the family." Both DPS-B and DOS-B had sufficient convergent and discriminative validity, sufficient internal consistency (DPS-B: α = 0.91 and subscales' αs = 0.78-0.91; DOS-B: α = 0.91 and subscales' αs = 0.78-0.94), and sufficient test-retest reliability (DPS-B: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of total score = 0.79 and subscales = 0.55-0.79; DOS-B: ICC of total score = 0.88 and subscales = 0.70-0.88).
: Both DPS-B and DOS-B are valid and reliable scales for evaluating the dying care processes and outcomes before and after death from the bereaved family members' perspectives.
目前尚无评估死亡前后临终关怀过程及结果的工具。因此,我们开发并检验了2个用于评估死亡前后临终关怀过程及结果的量表的有效性和可靠性。
对在5家机构去世的癌症患者的 bereaved family members 进行了一项横断面、匿名问卷调查。我们用345名bereaved family members对丧亲家属临终关怀过程量表(DPS-B)和丧亲家属临终关怀结果量表(DOS-B)进行了评估。
因素分析显示,DPS-B和DOS-B均由4个分量表组成。对于DPS-B,它们是“症状管理”、“对患者生前及死后尊严的尊重”、“向家属解释”和“家属关怀”。对于DOS-B,它们是“患者平静的死亡过程”、“生前及死后作为一个人受到尊重”、“患者与家属之间的良好关系”和“家属平静的死亡过程”。DPS-B和DOS-B均具有足够的收敛效度和区分效度、足够的内部一致性(DPS-B:α = 0.91,各分量表α值 = 0.78 - 0.91;DOS-B:α = 0.91,各分量表α值 = 0.78 - 0.94)以及足够的重测信度(DPS-B:总分的组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.79,各分量表 = 0.55 - 0.79;DOS-B:总分的ICC = 0.88,各分量表 = 0.70 - 0.88)。
从bereaved family members的角度来看,DPS-B和DOS-B都是评估死亡前后临终关怀过程及结果的有效且可靠的量表。