• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未来的网络安全劳动力:超越技术技能以实现成功的网络绩效。

The Future Cybersecurity Workforce: Going Beyond Technical Skills for Successful Cyber Performance.

作者信息

Dawson Jessica, Thomson Robert

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.

Army Cyber Institute, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;9:744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00744. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00744
PMID:29946276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6005833/
Abstract

One of the challenges in writing an article reviewing the current state of cyber education and workforce development is that there is a paucity of quantitative assessment regarding the cognitive aptitudes, work roles, or team organization required by cybersecurity professionals to be successful. In this review, we argue that the people who operate within the cyber domain need a combination of technical skills, domain specific knowledge, and social intelligence to be successful. They, like the networks they operate, must also be reliable, trustworthy, and resilient. Defining the knowledge, skills, attributes, and other characteristics is not as simple as defining a group of technical skills that people can be trained on; the complexity of the cyber domain makes this a unique challenge. There has been little research devoted to exactly what attributes individuals in the cyber domain need. What research does exist places an emphasis on technical and engineering skills while discounting the important social and organizational influences that dictate success or failure in everyday settings. This paper reviews the literature on cyber expertise and cyber workforce development to identify gaps and then argues for the important contribution of social fit in the highly complex and heterogenous cyber workforce. We then identify six assumptions for the future of cybersecurity workforce development, including the requirement for systemic thinkers, team players, a love for continued learning, strong communication ability, a sense of civic duty, and a blend of technical and social skill. Finally, we make recommendations for social and cognitive metrics which may be indicative of future performance in cyber work roles to provide a roadmap for future scholars.

摘要

撰写一篇回顾网络安全教育与劳动力发展现状的文章时面临的挑战之一是,对于网络安全专业人员取得成功所需的认知能力、工作角色或团队组织,缺乏定量评估。在本综述中,我们认为在网络领域工作的人员需要技术技能、特定领域知识和社交智慧的结合才能取得成功。他们与所操作的网络一样,还必须可靠、值得信赖且具有韧性。定义知识、技能、属性和其他特征并不像定义一组可以对人员进行培训的技术技能那么简单;网络领域的复杂性使其成为一项独特的挑战。很少有研究专门探讨网络领域的个人究竟需要哪些属性。现有的研究强调技术和工程技能,而忽视了在日常环境中决定成败的重要社会和组织影响。本文回顾了关于网络专业知识和网络劳动力发展的文献,以找出差距,然后论证社会适应性在高度复杂和多样化的网络劳动力中的重要贡献。然后,我们确定了网络安全劳动力发展未来的六个假设,包括对系统思维者、团队合作者、持续学习的热爱、强大的沟通能力、公民责任感以及技术和社交技能融合的要求。最后,我们对可能表明未来网络工作角色表现的社会和认知指标提出建议,为未来的学者提供路线图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49f/6005833/4ccce2cd0270/fpsyg-09-00744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49f/6005833/4ccce2cd0270/fpsyg-09-00744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49f/6005833/4ccce2cd0270/fpsyg-09-00744-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Future Cybersecurity Workforce: Going Beyond Technical Skills for Successful Cyber Performance.未来的网络安全劳动力:超越技术技能以实现成功的网络绩效。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;9:744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00744. eCollection 2018.
2
Characterizing and Measuring Maliciousness for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment.用于网络安全风险评估的恶意性特征描述与度量
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 5;9:39. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00039. eCollection 2018.
3
Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.人为因素对医疗机构网络安全的影响:系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;21(15):5119. doi: 10.3390/s21155119.
4
Cyber Hygiene Methodology for Raising Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Awareness in Health Care Organizations: Concept Study.网络卫生方法在提高医疗机构网络安全和数据隐私意识中的应用:概念研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 27;25:e41294. doi: 10.2196/41294.
5
A Multivocal Literature Review on Growing Social Engineering Based Cyber-Attacks/Threats During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Prospective Solutions.关于新冠疫情期间基于社会工程学的网络攻击/威胁不断增加的多视角文献综述:挑战与潜在解决方案
IEEE Access. 2021 Jan 1;9:7152-7169. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048839. eCollection 2021.
6
Analysis of cyber security knowledge gaps based on cyber security body of knowledge.基于网络安全知识体系的网络安全知识差距分析
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(2):1809-1831. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11261-8. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Cyber Teaming and Role Specialization in a Cyber Security Defense Competition.网络安全防御竞赛中的网络团队协作与角色专业化
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 19;9:2133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02133. eCollection 2018.
8
A conceptual system dynamics model for cybersecurity assessment of connected and autonomous vehicles.面向车联网和自动驾驶汽车网络安全评估的概念系统动力学模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Feb;165:106515. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106515. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
A deeper look into cybersecurity issues in the wake of Covid-19: A survey.新冠疫情后对网络安全问题的深入研究:一项调查。
J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2022 Nov;34(10):8176-8206. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional).医院网络安全风险与差距:综述(面向非网络专业人员)
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 11;4:862221. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a serious gaming approach for cyber aptitude assessment.开发一种用于网络能力评估的严肃游戏方法。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Jan 2;36(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1984740. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
2
Cybersecurity Advocates: Force Multipliers in Security Behavior Change.网络安全倡导者:安全行为改变中的力量倍增器。
IEEE Secur Priv. 2021 Jul;19(4). doi: 10.1109/msec.2021.3077405.
3
The Need for Cybersecurity in Industrial Revolution and Smart Cities.工业革命和智慧城市中的网络安全需求。

本文引用的文献

1
Information-Pooling Bias in Collaborative Security Incident Correlation Analysis.协作安全事件关联分析中的信息汇集偏差。
Hum Factors. 2018 Aug;60(5):626-639. doi: 10.1177/0018720818769249. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
Cyber situation awareness: modeling detection of cyber attacks with instance-based learning theory.网络情境感知:基于实例学习理论的网络攻击检测建模。
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):605-18. doi: 10.1177/0018720812464045.
3
Refining the theory of basic individual values.完善基本个体价值观理论。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;23(1):120. doi: 10.3390/s23010120.
4
The role of gender in providing expert advice on cyber conflict and artificial intelligence for military personnel.性别在为军事人员提供网络冲突和人工智能方面专家建议中的作用。
Front Big Data. 2022 Sep 30;5:992620. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.992620. eCollection 2022.
5
Validation of for : A Test Battery for the Selection of Cyber Soldiers.用于选拔网络战士的测试组合的验证。 (原文中“Validation of for :”表述不完整,推测可能是这样的意思,仅供参考)
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:868311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.868311. eCollection 2022.
6
Cybersecurity Advocates: Discovering the Characteristics and Skills of an Emergent Role.网络安全倡导者:探寻一个新兴角色的特点与技能
Inf Comput Secur. 2021;29(3). doi: 10.1108/ics-08-2020-0131.
7
Evaluating the Impact of Information System Quality on Continuance Intention Toward Cloud Financial Information System.评估信息系统质量对云财务信息系统持续使用意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:713353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713353. eCollection 2021.
8
Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.人为因素对医疗机构网络安全的影响:系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;21(15):5119. doi: 10.3390/s21155119.
9
The Role of User Behaviour in Improving Cyber Security Management.用户行为在改善网络安全管理中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 18;12:561011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.561011. eCollection 2021.
10
Debating the Future of Work: The Perception and Reaction of the Spanish Workforce to Digitization and Automation Technologies.关于工作的未来之辩论:西班牙劳动力对数字化和自动化技术的认知与反应
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 10;11:1965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01965. eCollection 2020.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):663-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029393. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
4
Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit.社会化策略、员工主动性与个人-组织契合度。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):232-41. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.232.
5
Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations.价值观与行为:关系的强度与结构
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Oct;29(10):1207-20. doi: 10.1177/0146167203254602.
6
The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.共享心智模型对团队过程和绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):273-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273.