Department of Biostatistics,Mailman School of Public Health,Columbia University Medical Center,New York,NY,USA.
Department of Psychiatry,College of Physicians and Surgeons,Columbia University Medical Center,New York,NY,USA.
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(6):931-939. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001551. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Although the DSM is a widely used diagnostic guide, lengthy criteria sets can be problematic and provide the primary motivation to identify short-forms. Using the 11 diagnostic criteria provided by the DSM-5 for alcohol use disorder (AUD), the present study develops a data-driven method to systematically identify subsets and associated cut-offs that yield diagnoses as similar as possible to use all 11 criteria.
Relying on data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC-III), our methodology identifies diagnostic short-forms for AUD by: (1) maximizing the association between the sum scores of all 11 criteria with newly constructed subscales from subsets of criteria; (2) optimizing the similarity of AUD prevalence between the current DSM-5 rule and newly constructed diagnostic short-forms; (3) maximizing sensitivity and specificity of the short-forms against the current DSM-5 rule; and (4) minimizing differences in the accuracy of the short-form across chosen covariates. Replication is shown using NESARC-Wave 2.
More than 11 000 diagnostic short-forms for DSM-5 AUD can be created and our method narrows down the optimal choices to eight. Results found that 'Neglecting major roles' and 'Activities given up' could be dropped with practically no change in who is diagnosed (specificity = 100%, sensitivity ⩾ 99.6%) or the severity of those diagnosed (κ = 0.97).
With a continuous improvement model adopted by the APA for DSM revisions, we offer a data-driven tool (a SAS Macro) that identifies diagnostic short-forms in a systematic and reproducible way to help advance potential improvements in future DSM revisions.
尽管 DSM 是一种广泛使用的诊断指南,但冗长的标准集可能会带来问题,并为确定简式提供主要动力。本研究使用 DSM-5 提供的 11 项酒精使用障碍(AUD)诊断标准,开发了一种数据驱动的方法,系统地识别子集和相关截止值,使诊断尽可能类似于使用所有 11 项标准。
依赖于国家酒精相关条件流行病学调查(NESARC-III)的数据,我们的方法通过以下方式为 AUD 确定诊断简式:(1)最大化所有 11 项标准的总和分数与从标准子集构建的新子量表之间的关联;(2)优化当前 DSM-5 规则与新构建的诊断简式之间 AUD 患病率的相似性;(3)最大化简式对当前 DSM-5 规则的敏感性和特异性;(4)最小化所选协变量之间简式准确性的差异。使用 NESARC-Wave 2 进行了复制。
可以创建超过 11000 种 DSM-5 AUD 的诊断简式,我们的方法将最佳选择缩小到八种。结果发现,“忽视主要角色”和“放弃活动”可以删除,而诊断的人(特异性=100%,敏感性≥99.6%)或诊断出的人的严重程度(κ=0.97)几乎没有变化。
采用 APA 对 DSM 修订的持续改进模型,我们提供了一种数据驱动的工具(一个 SAS 宏),以系统和可重复的方式识别诊断简式,以帮助推动未来 DSM 修订的潜在改进。