Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):73-79. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9915-6. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
The use of thickened liquids for dysphagia management has become wide-spread. Videofluoroscopy is commonly used to determine dysphagia severity and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, including texture modification, but this requires the use of radio-opaque contrast media. In order for the results of a videofluoroscopy to have validity with respect to confirming swallowing safety and efficiency on different liquid consistencies, it is important to understand the flow characteristics of the contrast media used and how the flow of these stimuli compares to the flow of liquids that are provided outside the assessment context. In this study, we explored the flow characteristics of 20% w/v barium and non-barium stimuli prepared using starch and gum thickeners to reach the slightly, mildly and moderately thick liquid categories defined by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI). Our goal was to identify recipes that would produce stimuli with stable flow properties over a 3 h time frame post mixing. Thickener concentration was titrated to achieve matching flow (i.e., IDDSI Flow Test results within a 1 ml range) across the four stimulus types (non-barium starch, non-barium gum, barium starch, barium gum) within each IDDSI level. The combination of barium and thickeners resulted in further thickening, particularly with starch-based thickening agents. A probe of the influence of refrigeration showed no difference in flow measures between chilled and room temperature stimuli over a 3-h time frame. Overall, recipes with stable flow over three hours were identified for all barium and non-barium liquids tested.
稠度液体在吞咽障碍管理中的应用已经广泛普及。透视检查常用于确定吞咽障碍的严重程度,并评估干预措施的效果,包括质地改良,但这需要使用放射性不透射线的对比剂。为了使透视检查结果在不同液体稠度下确认吞咽安全性和效率具有有效性,了解所使用对比剂的流动特性以及这些刺激物的流动与评估环境之外提供的液体的流动如何比较是很重要的。在这项研究中,我们探索了 20% w/v 钡和非钡刺激物的流动特性,这些刺激物是使用淀粉和胶增稠剂制备的,以达到国际吞咽障碍饮食标准化倡议 (IDDSI) 定义的轻度、中度和重度稠度液体类别。我们的目标是确定在混合后 3 小时的时间框架内具有稳定流动特性的配方。通过滴定增稠剂浓度,在四个刺激物类型(非钡淀粉、非钡胶、钡淀粉、钡胶)内匹配每个 IDDSI 级别内的流动(即 IDDSI 流动测试结果在 1 毫升范围内)。钡和增稠剂的结合导致进一步增稠,特别是使用基于淀粉的增稠剂。冷藏对流动测量的影响的探针表明,在 3 小时的时间框架内,冷藏和室温刺激物之间的流动没有差异。总的来说,已经确定了所有测试的钡和非钡液体在三小时内具有稳定流动的配方。