Peterson Carla A, Hughes-Belding Kere, Rowe Neil, Fan Liuran, Walter Melissa, Dooley Leslie, Wang Wen, Steffensmeier Chloe
Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, 4380 Palmer, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
, 1331 Palmer Building, 2222 Osborn Drive, Ames, IA, 50011-1084, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Oct;22(Suppl 1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2534-x.
Objectives This study was conducted to look inside home visits to examine active intervention ingredients used and their relations with ratings of home visit quality. In particular, triadic interactions that engage the home visitor, parent, and child together and provide a context for home visitors to facilitate parent-child interactions by observing, modeling and coaching behaviors that promote optimal child development were examined. Methods Observations were conducted to describe intervention activities (with the HVOF-R) and rate quality of home visit practices and engagement (with the HOVRS A+). Results Analyses revealed the majority of home visit time (71%) was spent in home visitor-parent interactions with only a small proportion of home visit time (17%) spent in triadic interactions and an even smaller proportion of time (2%) during which home visitors actively coached parent-child interactions. Amount of time spent in triadic interactions was related positively to quality ratings of home visit practices and engagement. Moreover, time spent coaching parent-child interactions uniquely predicted home visit quality after accounting for visit length and home visitor time spent observing and modeling. Conclusions for Practice Increasing the percentage of home visitors engage the parent and child in triadic interaction should be a focus for home visiting programs. Home visitors will likely need professional development and supervisory support to enhance their skills in coaching parent-child interactions during triadic interactions.
目的 本研究旨在深入考察家访情况,以探究所使用的积极干预要素及其与家访质量评级之间的关系。具体而言,研究考察了家访人员、家长和孩子共同参与的三元互动,为家访人员提供了一个情境,使其能够通过观察、示范和指导促进儿童最佳发展的行为来推动亲子互动。方法 通过观察来描述干预活动(使用家庭访问观察框架 - 修订版),并对家访实践和参与度进行评级(使用家庭访问评级量表A +)。结果 分析显示,大部分家访时间(71%)用于家访人员与家长的互动,只有一小部分家访时间(17%)用于三元互动,而家访人员积极指导亲子互动的时间占比更小(2%)。三元互动所花费的时间与家访实践和参与度的质量评级呈正相关。此外,在考虑了家访时长以及家访人员用于观察和示范的时间后,用于指导亲子互动的时间能够独特地预测家访质量。实践结论 增加家访人员让家长和孩子参与三元互动的比例应成为家访项目的重点。家访人员可能需要专业发展和监督支持,以提高他们在三元互动中指导亲子互动的技能。