Issat T, Beta J, Nowicka M A, Durczynski A, Jakimiuk A J
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44(3):359-363.
To assess the efficacy of warm normal saline distention solution versus a standard, room-temperature normal saline as distention medium for pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy.
A prospective randomized case-placebo controlled study was conducted in tertiary care centre - Central Clinical Hospital of Ministry of Interior and Administration. Study group consisted of 100 women referred for outpatient hysteroscopy between January 2015 and July 2015. Every patient, who was referred for an office hysteroscopy, was offered to participate in the study to receive a sterile, 0.9% normal saline warmed up to 36⁰C as distention medium. Control group were women receiving sterile, room temperature of 25⁰C, 0.9% normal saline solution as a distention medium. No pre-medication nor analgesia were used. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for one-dimensional pain assessment. Women were asked to mark a VAS score before, during, and five and 15 minutes following the procedure.
Median VAS scores during and directly after the anaesthesia-free hysteroscopy were no different between two groups. (p = 0.554 and p = 0.121, respectively). There were also no differences in the procedure time between groups (p = 0.845).
Warm normal saline distention solution does not reduce the pain during and at the end of the outpatient hysteroscopy. The effect does not depend on the age of women, menopausal status, parity or type of outpatient hysteroscopy (operative or diagnostic).
评估温生理盐水扩张液与标准室温生理盐水作为门诊宫腔镜检查时的扩张介质在缓解疼痛方面的疗效。
在三级医疗中心——内政和行政部中央临床医院进行了一项前瞻性随机病例 - 安慰剂对照研究。研究组由2015年1月至2015年7月期间转诊进行门诊宫腔镜检查的100名女性组成。每一位转诊进行门诊宫腔镜检查的患者都被邀请参与该研究,以接受加热至36⁰C的无菌0.9%生理盐水作为扩张介质。对照组为接受无菌、室温25⁰C的0.9%生理盐水溶液作为扩张介质的女性。未使用术前用药或镇痛措施。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)进行一维疼痛评估。要求女性在手术前、手术期间以及手术后5分钟和15分钟标记VAS评分。
两组在无麻醉宫腔镜检查期间及检查刚结束时的VAS评分中位数无差异。(分别为p = 0.554和p = 0.121)。两组之间的手术时间也无差异(p = 0.845)。
温生理盐水扩张液不能减轻门诊宫腔镜检查期间及检查结束时的疼痛。该效果不取决于女性的年龄、绝经状态、产次或门诊宫腔镜检查的类型(手术性或诊断性)。