1 Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
2 Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Feb;33(2):199-207. doi: 10.1177/0890117118784233. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
To examine how food insecurity and psychological distress interact in its association with smoking and to explore how food insecurity and psychological distress are associated with quitting smoking using quit ratio estimates.
Cross-sectional study.
Data from the 2015 California Health Interview Survey.
A total of 3007 lower income adults who have ever smoked.
Ever smoking was defined as smoking 100+ cigarettes in the entire lifetime, with current smoking defined as smoking "every day" or "some days" and former smoking defined as smoking "not at all." Psychological distress and food insecurity were measured by the 6-item K6 Psychological Distress Scale and the 6-item Food Security Survey Short Form, respectively.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlates of smoking status. Quit ratios (percentage of ever smokers who have quit) were calculated across study variables.
Reporting food insecurity with psychological distress was independently associated with lower odds of being a former smoker, compared to reporting food security without psychological distress. The quit ratio was lower among ever smokers reporting food insecurity with distress (41%) compared to ever smokers reporting food security without distress (63%).
Specific conditions of impoverishment, such as food insecurity, interact with psychological distress in its association with continued smoking. Interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities in smoking should consider the interacting role of food insecurity and psychological distress.
研究食品不安全与心理困扰在与吸烟相关联中的相互作用,并利用戒烟比例估计值探讨食品不安全和心理困扰与戒烟之间的关系。
横断面研究。
2015 年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的数据。
共有 3007 名收入较低的曾吸烟成年人。
终身吸烟定义为吸烟 100 支或以上,目前吸烟定义为“每天”或“有时”吸烟,以前吸烟定义为“从不”吸烟。心理困扰和食品不安全分别通过 6 项 K6 心理困扰量表和 6 项食品安全调查短表进行测量。
采用多因素逻辑回归分析来研究吸烟状况的相关因素。根据研究变量计算戒烟比例(曾经吸烟者中戒烟的百分比)。
与没有心理困扰但报告食品安全的人相比,报告食品不安全且伴有心理困扰的人,以前吸烟的可能性较低。与没有心理困扰但报告食品安全的人相比,报告食品不安全且伴有心理困扰的曾吸烟者的戒烟比例较低(41%比 63%)。
特定的贫困状况,如食品不安全,与心理困扰在与持续吸烟的关联中相互作用。减少吸烟方面社会经济差异的干预措施应考虑到食品不安全和心理困扰的相互作用。