• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study.开发全院范围的质量和安全仪表板:一项定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1000-1007. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study.让卫生专业人员参与制定质量和安全仪表板:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e42649. doi: 10.2196/42649.
3
Clinical dashboard development and use for academic detailing in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.临床仪表板在美国退伍军人事务部的学术细化开发和使用。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Mar-Apr;59(2S):S96-S103.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Insights from staff nurses and managers on unit-specific nursing performance dashboards: a qualitative study.从护士和护士长角度看特定单元护理绩效仪表板:定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1001-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002595. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
5
Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands.绩效指标是否用于医院质量管理:荷兰卫生专业人员和质量管理人员的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1826-3.
6
Developing an Intranet-Based Lymphedema Dashboard for Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams: Design Research Study.为乳腺癌多学科团队开发基于内联网的淋巴水肿信息平台:设计研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e13188. doi: 10.2196/13188.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Development of maternity dashboards across a UK health region; current practice, continuing problems.英国某卫生区域的孕产妇仪表盘开发;当前做法,持续存在的问题。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
9
Hospital performance dashboards: a literature review.医院绩效仪表盘:文献综述。
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 May 15;31(3):385-406. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2017-0088.
10
A Collection of Components to Design Clinical Dashboards Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Qualitative Study.纳入患者报告结局指标的临床仪表盘设计组件集:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 2;26:e55267. doi: 10.2196/55267.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs in value-based health care dashboards: a qualitative study on stakeholder requirements.基于价值的医疗保健仪表盘成本:关于利益相关者需求的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):1103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13054-4.
2
Designing a Real-Time Medication Intake and Adherence Dashboard: Features, Functionality, and Data Display to Meet the Needs of Patients, Care Partners and Healthcare Providers.设计一个实时药物摄入与依从性仪表盘:满足患者、护理伙伴及医疗服务提供者需求的功能、特性及数据显示
J Med Syst. 2025 May 6;49(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02189-w.
3
From Data to Improvement: Social Mechanisms as a Key to Understanding Dashboard Adoption.从数据到改进:社会机制是理解仪表盘采用情况的关键
Am J Med Qual. 2025;40(2):31-37. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000225. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Creating a data warehouse to support monitoring of NSQHS blood management standard from EMR data.创建一个数据仓库,以支持从电子病历数据监测 NSQHS 血液管理标准。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02732-8.
5
TeamSTEPPS improves patient safety.团队 STEPPS 可提高患者安全性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 25;13(2):e002669. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002669.
6
Triptychon: Usability evaluation and implementation of a web-based application for patients' lab and vital parameters.三联画:一款用于患者实验室及生命体征参数的基于网络应用程序的可用性评估与实施
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 5;9:20552076231211552. doi: 10.1177/20552076231211552. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
7
Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study.让卫生专业人员参与制定质量和安全仪表板:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e42649. doi: 10.2196/42649.
8
How do we measure organisational wellness? Development of a comprehensive patient-centred and employee-centred visual analytical solution.我们如何衡量组织的健康状况?开发一种全面的以患者为中心和以员工为中心的可视化分析解决方案。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002081.
9
Requirements and challenges of hospital dashboards: a systematic literature review.医院仪表盘的需求与挑战:系统文献回顾
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02037-8.
10
The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the World Health Organization European Region: A qualitative study.世界卫生组织欧洲区域33个国家新冠疫情数据仪表盘团队在疫情第一年的经历:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 29;8:20552076221121154. doi: 10.1177/20552076221121154. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands.绩效指标是否用于医院质量管理:荷兰卫生专业人员和质量管理人员的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1826-3.
2
From Information Management to Information Visualization: Development of Radiology Dashboards.从信息管理到信息可视化:放射学仪表板的发展
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 May 11;7(2):308-29. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-08-RA-0104. eCollection 2016.
3
Development of Performance Dashboards in Healthcare Sector: Key Practical Issues.医疗保健领域绩效仪表板的开发:关键实际问题
Acta Inform Med. 2015 Oct;23(5):317-21. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.317-321. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
4
Designing a clinical dashboard to fill information gaps in the emergency department.设计一个临床信息平台以填补急诊科的信息空白。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1098-104. eCollection 2014.
5
A design protocol to develop radiology dashboards.开发放射学仪表板的设计方案。
Acta Inform Med. 2014 Oct;22(5):341-6. doi: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.341-346. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
6
Developing a general ward nursing dashboard.开发一个普通病房护理仪表盘。
Nurs Stand. 2014 Dec 15;29(15):43-9. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.15.43.e9247.
7
Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature.用于改善患者护理的仪表盘:文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
8
Insights from staff nurses and managers on unit-specific nursing performance dashboards: a qualitative study.从护士和护士长角度看特定单元护理绩效仪表板:定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1001-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002595. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research.医院董事会对质量和患者安全的监督:近期实证研究的叙述性回顾和综合。
Milbank Q. 2013 Dec;91(4):738-70. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12032.
10
Implementing the Clinical Dashboard at VCUHS.在弗吉尼亚联邦大学医疗系统实施临床仪表板。
NI 2012 (2012). 2012 Jun 23;2012:11. eCollection 2012.

开发全院范围的质量和安全仪表板:一项定性研究。

Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1000-1007. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784
PMID:29950323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6288703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several countries have national policies and programmes requiring hospitals to use quality and safety (QS) indicators. To present an overview of these indicators, hospital-wide QS (HWQS) dashboards are designed. There is little evidence how these dashboards are developed. The challenges faced to develop these dashboards in Dutch hospitals were retrospectively studied.

METHODS

24 focus group interviews were conducted: 12 with hospital managers (n=25; 39.7%) and 12 support staff (n=38; 60.3%) in 12 of the largest Dutch hospitals. Open and axial codings were applied consecutively to analyse the data collected.

RESULTS

A heuristic tool for the general development process for HWQS dashboards containing five phases was identified. In phase 1, hospitals make inventories to determine the available data and focus too much on quantitative data relevant for accountability. In phase 2, hospitals develop dashboard content by translating data into meaningful indicators for different users, which is not easy due to differing demands. In phase 3, hospitals search for layouts that depict the dashboard content suited for users with different cognitive abilities and analytical skills. In phase 4, hospitals try to integrate dashboards into organisational structures to ensure that data are systematically reviewed and acted on. In phase 5, hospitals want to improve the flexibility of their dashboards to make this adaptable under differing circumstances.

CONCLUSION

The literature on dashboards addresses the technical and content aspects of dashboards, but overlooks the organisational development process. This study shows how technical and organisational aspects are relevant in development processes.

摘要

背景

一些国家制定了国家政策和方案,要求医院使用质量和安全(QS)指标。为了概述这些指标,设计了医院范围的质量和安全(HWQS)仪表板。几乎没有证据表明这些仪表板是如何开发的。本研究回顾性地研究了荷兰医院开发这些仪表板所面临的挑战。

方法

对 12 家最大的荷兰医院中的 12 家医院管理人员(n=25;39.7%)和 12 名支持人员(n=38;60.3%)进行了 24 次焦点小组访谈。连续应用开放式和轴向编码对收集的数据进行分析。

结果

确定了一个用于 HWQS 仪表板一般开发过程的启发式工具,包含五个阶段。在第 1 阶段,医院进行清查,以确定可用数据,并过于关注与问责制相关的定量数据。在第 2 阶段,医院通过将数据转化为不同用户的有意义的指标来开发仪表板内容,由于需求不同,这并不容易。在第 3 阶段,医院寻找适合不同认知能力和分析技能用户的仪表板内容布局。在第 4 阶段,医院尝试将仪表板整合到组织结构中,以确保数据系统地进行审查和采取行动。在第 5 阶段,医院希望提高仪表板的灵活性,以便在不同情况下进行调整。

结论

仪表板文献涉及仪表板的技术和内容方面,但忽略了组织发展过程。本研究表明技术和组织方面在开发过程中是相关的。