• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植中心的安全态度文化保持稳定:来自新冠疫情的证据。

Safety attitudes culture remain stable in a transplant center: evidence from the coronavirus pandemic.

作者信息

Zhang Chi, Wilson-Sheehan Sena, Ruch Brianna, Wagler Josiah, Abidali Ali, Lim Elisabeth S, Chang Yu-Hui, Fowler Christopher, Douglas David D, Mathur Amit K

机构信息

Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Front Transplant. 2023 Sep 26;2:1208916. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1208916. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frtra.2023.1208916
PMID:38993852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11235290/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to understand how safety culture may evolve during disruption, by using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example, to identify vulnerabilities in the system that could impact patient outcomes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of transplant personnel at a high-volume transplant center was conducted using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). Survey responses were scaled and evaluated pre- and post-COVID-19 (2019 and 2021).

RESULTS

Two-hundred and thirty-eight responses were collected (134 pre-pandemic and 104 post-pandemic). Represented organ groups included: kidney ( = 89;38%), heart ( = 18;8%), liver ( = 54;23%), multiple ( = 66;28%), and other ( = 10;4%). Responders primarily included nurses ( = 75;34%), administration ( = 50;23%), and physicians ( = 24;11%). Workers had high safety, job satisfaction, stress recognition, and working conditions satisfaction (score >75) both before and after the pandemic with overlapping responses across both timepoints. Stress recognition, safety, and working conditions improved post-COVID-19, but teamwork, job satisfaction, and perceptions of management were somewhat negatively impacted (all  > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the serious health care disruptions induced by the pandemic, high domain ratings were notable and largely maintained in a high-volume transplant center. The SAQ is a valuable tool for healthcare units and can be used in longitudinal assessments of transplant culture of safety as a component of quality assurance and performance improvement initiatives.

摘要

背景

我们试图以2019冠状病毒病大流行为例,了解安全文化在混乱期间如何演变,以识别可能影响患者预后的系统漏洞。

方法

使用安全态度问卷(SAQ)对一家大型移植中心的移植人员进行横断面分析。对2019年(新冠疫情前)和2021年(新冠疫情后)的调查回复进行评分和评估。

结果

共收集到238份回复(疫情前134份,疫情后104份)。所代表的器官组包括:肾脏(=89;38%)、心脏(=18;8%)、肝脏(=54;23%)、多个器官(=66;28%)和其他(=10;4%)。回复者主要包括护士(=75;34%)、行政人员(=50;23%)和医生(=24;11%)。疫情前后,工作人员的安全、工作满意度、压力认知和工作条件满意度都很高(得分>75),两个时间点的回复有重叠。新冠疫情后,压力认知、安全和工作条件有所改善,但团队合作、工作满意度和对管理层的看法受到了一定的负面影响(所有P>0.05)。

结论

尽管疫情给医疗保健带来了严重干扰,但在一家大型移植中心,高领域评分值得注意且基本保持。SAQ是医疗单位的一个有价值的工具,可作为质量保证和绩效改进举措的一部分,用于移植安全文化的纵向评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/3aba02ea70fe/frtra-02-1208916-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/4928c163993a/frtra-02-1208916-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/1dc36d848f92/frtra-02-1208916-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/3aba02ea70fe/frtra-02-1208916-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/4928c163993a/frtra-02-1208916-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/1dc36d848f92/frtra-02-1208916-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e8e/11235290/3aba02ea70fe/frtra-02-1208916-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety attitudes culture remain stable in a transplant center: evidence from the coronavirus pandemic.移植中心的安全态度文化保持稳定:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Front Transplant. 2023 Sep 26;2:1208916. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1208916. eCollection 2023.
2
The Perception of the Patient Safety Climate by Health Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic-International Research.卫生专业人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间对患者安全氛围的感知-国际研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 6;19(15):9712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159712.
3
Evaluating Polish nurses' working conditions and patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.评估波兰护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的工作条件和患者安全。
Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Jun;69(2):239-248. doi: 10.1111/inr.12724. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
4
Exploring safety culture in the Finnish ambulance service with Emergency Medical Services Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.运用《急诊医疗服务安全态度问卷》探索芬兰救护服务中的安全文化。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 12;29(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00960-9.
5
Factors Relating to a Safety Culture in the University Perinatal Center: The Nurses' and Midwives' Perspective.与大学围产中心安全文化相关的因素:护士和助产士的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169845.
6
Interprofessional team assessments of the patient safety climate in Swedish operating rooms: a cross-sectional survey.瑞典手术室患者安全氛围的跨专业团队评估:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):e015607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015607.
7
Patient safety culture in a Dutch pediatric surgical intensive care unit: an evaluation using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.荷兰儿科外科重症监护病房的患者安全文化:使用安全态度问卷进行评估。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;12(6):e310-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318220afca.
8
Application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in Albanian hospitals: a cross-sectional study.安全态度问卷(SAQ)在阿尔巴尼亚医院中的应用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e006528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006528.
9
Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: a nationwide survey using Chinese version Safety Attitude Questionnaire.台湾地区医院安全文化:使用中文版安全态度问卷的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-234.
10
Teamwork and Safety Attitudes in Complex Aortic Surgery at a Dutch Hospital: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.荷兰一家医院复杂主动脉手术中的团队合作与安全态度:横断面调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Apr 8;7(2):e17131. doi: 10.2196/17131.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of COVID-19 on kidney transplant care.2019冠状病毒病对肾移植护理的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:1093126. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1093126. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of the convergence of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.安全态度问卷和医院患者安全文化调查的收敛性分析。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Dec 16;76(1):e20210379. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0379. eCollection 2022.
3
Improving Patient Safety Culture During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan.在 COVID-19 大流行期间改善台湾的患者安全文化。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:889870. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.889870. eCollection 2022.
4
What Has Been the Impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A Case Study from a Large Metropolitan Healthcare Trust.Covid-19 对安全文化有何影响?来自大型都市保健信托的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 25;17(19):7034. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197034.
5
Patient safety culture in primary and home care services.基层和家庭医疗服务中的患者安全文化。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 12;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01263-1.
6
Testing a Model of Speaking up in Nursing.测试护理中直言不讳的模式。
J Nurs Adm. 2020 Jun;50(6):349-354. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000896.
7
Management of transplant patients outside hospital during COVID-19 epidemic: A Chinese experience.2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间移植患者的院外管理:中国经验
Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;22(5):e13327. doi: 10.1111/tid.13327. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Systematic review of methods for quantifying teamwork in the operating theatre.手术室团队协作量化方法的系统评价
BJS Open. 2018 Feb 15;2(2):42-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.40. eCollection 2018 Apr.
9
Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.接受肾脏捐献的项目正在进行系统改进协议。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep;18(9):2182-2188. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14907. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
10
Parallels in safety between aviation and healthcare.航空与医疗保健在安全方面的相似之处。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):875-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 8.