Sánchez-Romero Eleuterio A, Pecos-Martín Daniel, Calvo-Lobo César, Ochoa-Sáez Victoria, Burgos-Caballero Verónica, Fernández-Carnero Josué
Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Department, Rey Juan Carlos University Physical Therapy Department, Alcalá de Henares University, Madrid Physiotherapy and Pain Group Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, León Nursing Home "Manuel Herranz Occupational Therapy Department, Nursing Home "Manuel Herranz, Esclavas de la Virgen Dolorosa", Pozuelo de Alarcón La Paz Hospital Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ Research Multidisciplinary Group for Treatment of Pain, URJC-Banco Santander Excellence Research Group, Madrid, Spain.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11255. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011255.
Few studies have investigated the dry needling (DN) approach on knee osteoarthritis (KO) patients. The study's aim was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of adding DN to a therapeutic exercise protocol in the treatment of KO in older adults.
A double-blind, pilot clinical trial with parallel groups [NCT02698072] was carried out for 12 weeks of treatment and follow-up. Twenty patients aged 65 years and older with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the muscles of the thigh were recruited from older-adult care centers and randomly assigned to a DN + Exercise group or a Sham-DN + Exercise group. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; primary outcome) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire (WOMAC) were assessed before and after the intervention.
The NRS (analysis of variance, ANOVA) showed statistically significant differences in the time factor (F = 53.038; P < .0001; ηp = 0.747). However, it did not show a significant change in the group-time interaction (F = 0.082; P = .777; ηp = 0.005). The WOMAC scores (ANOVA) showed statistically significant differences in the time factor for total score WOMAC questionnaire (F = 84.826; P < .0001; ηp = 0.825), WOMAC pain (F = 90.478; P < .0001; ηp = 0.834), WOMAC stiffness (F = 14.556; P < .001; ηp = 0.447), and WOMAC function (F = 70.872; P < .0001; ηp = 0.797). However, it did not show a statistically significant change in the group-time interaction.
Despite the pain intensity and disability clinically relevant improvement for both DN and Sham-DN combined with exercise, 6 sessions of DN added to a therapeutic exercise program for older adults with KO did not seem to improve pain intensity and functionality.
很少有研究探讨干针疗法(DN)对膝骨关节炎(KO)患者的作用。本研究的目的是评估在治疗老年人KO时,在治疗性运动方案中添加DN的短期疗效。
进行了一项双盲、平行组试点临床试验[NCT02698072],为期12周的治疗和随访。从老年护理中心招募了20名65岁及以上大腿肌肉有肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)的患者,并随机分配到DN+运动组或假DN+运动组。在干预前后评估数字评分量表(NRS;主要结局)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数问卷(WOMAC)。
NRS(方差分析,ANOVA)显示时间因素存在统计学显著差异(F = 53.038;P <.0001;ηp = 0.747)。然而,组间时间交互作用未显示出显著变化(F = 0.082;P = 0.777;ηp = 0.005)。WOMAC评分(ANOVA)显示,WOMAC问卷总分的时间因素存在统计学显著差异(F = 84.826;P <.0001;ηp = 0.825),WOMAC疼痛(F = 90.478;P <.0001;ηp = 0.834),WOMAC僵硬(F = 14.556;P <.001;ηp = 0.447)和WOMAC功能(F = 70.872;P <.0001;ηp = 0.797)。然而,组间时间交互作用未显示出统计学显著变化。
尽管DN和假DN联合运动在临床上均使疼痛强度和残疾状况得到了相关改善,但在针对患有KO的老年人的治疗性运动方案中增加6次DN治疗似乎并未改善疼痛强度和功能。