Crastechini E, Borges A B, Torres Crg
Oper Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;44(1):76-87. doi: 10.2341/17-150-L. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
: To evaluate the effect of a remineralizing gel combining fluoride and calcium silicate/phosphate or a sodium fluoride gel on bleached enamel microhardness, color, and wear susceptibility.
: Two hundred forty bovine enamel-dentin samples were prepared. Baseline analysis of Knoop microhardness, color coordinates (Lab*), and surface profile were performed. According to the baseline microhardness values, specimens were stratified into six groups (n=40): NC (negative control)-no treatment; BL (positive control)-bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide gel (Opalescence Boost, Ultradent); BL/Rs-bleaching + application of calcium silicate/phosphate gel (Regenerate Serum, Unilever - Rs); Rs/BL-Rs + bleaching; Rs/BL/Rs-Rs + bleaching + Rs; and BL/F-bleaching + 2% sodium fluoride gel. After the treatment described for each group, color change (ΔE) and microhardness were evaluated again. To evaluate abrasion susceptibility, samples were randomly divided into two subgroups, according to the toothpaste used (Cp-Close Up or Rt-Regenerate), and underwent 100,000 brushing strokes. The profile of each sample was evaluated and the mean wear calculated. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests.
: All bleached groups showed a significant reduction of microhardness in relation to the negative control. The groups treated with remineralizing gels showed a significantly higher microhardness and less wear than the positive control, although nonsignificant differences were observed among them. Nonsignificant differences in ΔE were found among bleached groups. The groups brushed with Regenerate toothpaste showed significantly less wear than those brushed with Close Up toothpaste.
: The remineralizing gels did not interfere with bleaching efficacy. However, all the treatments minimized the surface hardness reduction caused by the bleaching procedure and enamel loss after abrasion. Regenerate toothpaste resulted in less enamel abrasion.
评估一种含氟与硅酸钙/磷酸盐的再矿化凝胶或氟化钠凝胶对漂白牙釉质显微硬度、颜色及磨损敏感性的影响。
制备240个牛牙釉质-牙本质样本。进行努氏显微硬度、颜色坐标(Lab*)及表面轮廓的基线分析。根据基线显微硬度值,将样本分为六组(n = 40):NC(阴性对照)-未处理;BL(阳性对照)-用40%过氧化氢凝胶(Opalescence Boost,Ultradent)漂白;BL/Rs-漂白+应用硅酸钙/磷酸盐凝胶(Regenerate Serum,联合利华-Rs);Rs/BL-Rs+漂白;Rs/BL/Rs-Rs+漂白+Rs;以及BL/F-漂白+2%氟化钠凝胶。在对每组进行所述处理后,再次评估颜色变化(ΔE)和显微硬度。为评估磨损敏感性,根据使用的牙膏(Cp-佳洁士或Rt-Regenerate)将样本随机分为两个亚组,并进行100,000次刷牙冲程。评估每个样本的轮廓并计算平均磨损量。数据采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析。
所有漂白组与阴性对照相比,显微硬度均显著降低。用再矿化凝胶处理的组与阳性对照相比,显微硬度显著更高且磨损更少,尽管它们之间未观察到显著差异。漂白组之间在ΔE方面未发现显著差异。用Regenerate牙膏刷牙的组比用佳洁士牙膏刷牙的组磨损显著更少。
再矿化凝胶不影响漂白效果。然而,所有处理均将漂白过程导致的表面硬度降低及磨损后牙釉质损失降至最低。Regenerate牙膏导致的牙釉质磨损更少。