Chi Michelene T H, Adams Joshua, Bogusch Emily B, Bruchok Christiana, Kang Seokmin, Lancaster Matthew, Levy Roy, Li Na, McEldoon Katherine L, Stump Glenda S, Wylie Ruth, Xu Dongchen, Yaghmourian David L
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University.
Phoenix Union School District.
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun 28. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12626.
ICAP is a theory of active learning that differentiates students' engagement based on their behaviors. ICAP postulates that Interactive engagement, demonstrated by co-generative collaborative behaviors, is superior for learning to Constructive engagement, indicated by generative behaviors. Both kinds of engagement exceed the benefits of Active or Passive engagement, marked by manipulative and attentive behaviors, respectively. This paper discusses a 5-year project that attempted to translate ICAP into a theory of instruction using five successive measures: (a) teachers' understanding of ICAP after completing an online module, (b) their success at designing lesson plans using different ICAP modes, (c) fidelity of teachers' classroom implementation, (d) modes of students' enacted behaviors, and (e) students' learning outcomes. Although teachers had minimal success in designing Constructive and Interactive activities, students nevertheless learned significantly more in the context of Constructive than Active activities. We discuss reasons for teachers' overall difficulty in designing and eliciting Interactive engagement.
ICAP是一种主动学习理论,它根据学生的行为来区分他们的参与度。ICAP假设,由共同生成的协作行为所表现出的交互式参与,在学习方面优于由生成行为所表明的建设性参与。这两种参与都超过了分别以操纵性和专注性行为为特征的主动或被动参与的益处。本文讨论了一个为期5年的项目,该项目试图通过以下五个连续的措施将ICAP转化为一种教学理论:(a) 教师在完成一个在线模块后对ICAP的理解;(b) 他们使用不同ICAP模式设计教案的成功情况;(c) 教师课堂实施的保真度;(d) 学生实际行为的模式;以及 (e) 学生的学习成果。尽管教师在设计建设性和交互式活动方面取得的成功有限,但学生在建设性活动的背景下比在主动活动中仍然学到了更多东西。我们讨论了教师在设计和引发交互式参与方面总体困难的原因。