Mary Lou Fulton Teachers' College, Arizona State University.
Top Cogn Sci. 2021 Jul;13(3):441-463. doi: 10.1111/tops.12539. Epub 2021 May 16.
Despite decades of research related to teaching and learning, the findings have made little impact on classroom teaching and learning. This paper briefly describes the four existing methods to close this gap, with more extensive analyses of the limitations of one of the four methods, which is to consolidate and distill robust laboratory findings reported over the past decades and attempt to translate them for classroom practice. An alternative method is proposed, which is to translate a theory of how students learn, called Interactive, Constructive, Active, Passive (ICAP), so that teachers and practitioners can translate their understanding of such a theory into practice themselves, thereby giving teachers autonomy, flexibility, generalizability, and ownership of their own designed interventions based on ICAP. The paper proposes that in order to close the research-practice gap, a multi-step empirical translation research framework is needed.
尽管数十年来一直致力于教学研究,但这些研究成果对课堂教学的影响微乎其微。本文简要描述了四种现有的缩小这一差距的方法,并对其中一种方法的局限性进行了更广泛的分析,这种方法是整合和提炼过去几十年中报告的强有力的实验室研究结果,并尝试将其转化为课堂实践。本文提出了一种替代方法,即翻译一种关于学生如何学习的理论,称为互动、建构、主动、被动(ICAP),以便教师和实践者能够自行将对这一理论的理解转化为实践,从而使教师能够根据 ICAP 对自己设计的干预措施拥有自主权、灵活性、可推广性和所有权。本文提出,为了缩小研究与实践之间的差距,需要一个多步骤的实证翻译研究框架。