• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Arthroscopically Repaired Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears: Patient Demographics, Postoperative Outcomes, and a Comparison of Success and Failure Cases.关节镜下修复桶柄状半月板撕裂:患者特征、术后结果,以及成功与失败病例的比较。
Cartilage. 2020 Jan;11(1):77-87. doi: 10.1177/1947603518783473. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.径向与桶柄状半月板撕裂修复的对比结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.在至少2年的随访中,桶柄状半月板修复和垂直半月板修复可获得相似的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3104-3110. doi: 10.1177/0363546517719244. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
Long-term follow-up of bucket-handle meniscal repairs: chondroprotective effect outweighs high failure risk.桶柄状半月板修复的长期随访:软骨保护作用大于高失败风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2209-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06787-2. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
5
Clinical outcomes following surgically repaired bucket-handle meniscus tears.手术修复半月板桶柄状撕裂后的临床结果
Phys Sportsmed. 2017 Sep;45(3):329-336. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2017.1331688. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
Influence of Medial Meniscus Bucket-Handle Repair in Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics: A Biomechanical Study.前交叉韧带重建中内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复对胫股接触力学的影响:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2412-2420. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.052.
7
Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study.一期修复合并前交叉韧带重建的移位型瓣状半月板撕裂可获得良好的半月板存活率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jun;104-B(6):680-686. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2021-1340.R2.
8
Clinical outcome and failure analysis of medial meniscus bucket-handle tear repair: a series of 96 patients with a minimum 2 year follow-up.内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复的临床结果和失败分析:一组 96 例患者的至少 2 年随访。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1649-1654. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03346-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Risk factors for all-inside meniscal repair failure in isolation and in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.孤立性与前交叉韧带重建联合应用时全内半月板修复失败的危险因素。
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
10
Outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle tears of medial meniscus.慢性内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复的结果。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):492-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Saving the Meniscus: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Incidence, Treatment, and Failure Rate of the Main Meniscal Tear Types at 24-Month Follow-Up.挽救半月板:一项关于主要半月板撕裂类型在24个月随访时的发病率、治疗及失败率的回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3350. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103350.
2
Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: Still a Useful Technique.由内向外半月板修复术:仍是一项实用技术。
Video J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 27;2(5):26350254221102466. doi: 10.1177/26350254221102466. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
3
The impact of smoking on meniscus surgery: a systematic review.吸烟对半月板手术的影响:一项系统综述。
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Apr 1;10(4):193-202. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0097.
4
Single-stage ACL reconstruction and displaced bucket handle Meniscus repair is associated with lower Meniscus repair failure rates compared to two-stage surgery.与两阶段手术相比,单阶段前交叉韧带重建和移位的桶柄状半月板修复的半月板修复失败率较低。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 7;12(1):e70199. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70199. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Unrepaired ramp lesions are associated with a higher risk of secondary medial meniscus bucket handle tear compared to lateral meniscus bucket handle tear after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.与前交叉韧带重建术后外侧半月板桶柄状撕裂相比,未修复的斜坡损伤与继发内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂的风险更高相关。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 24;12(1):e70176. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70176. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of All-Inside Versus Inside-Out Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: A Cohort Study.桶柄状半月板撕裂全内修复与由内向外修复的长期比较结果:一项队列研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):23259671241296899. doi: 10.1177/23259671241296899. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Comparison of Subsequent Surgery After Repair in Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears and Meniscectomy Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study.桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术后二次手术与半月板切除术的比较:一项大型纳入队列研究的分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 5;12(9):23259671241270355. doi: 10.1177/23259671241270355. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction.在进行前交叉韧带重建时,与部分半月板切除术相比,桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术能改善患者预后。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Aug 28;11(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears Might Not Be an Urgency: The Time to Meniscus Repair Does Not Seem to Affect the Mid-Term Outcome-A Retrospective Study of Sixty Tears with a Mean Follow-Up of 6 Years.桶柄状半月板撕裂可能并非紧急情况:半月板修复时机似乎不影响中期结果——一项对60例撕裂病例的回顾性研究,平均随访6年
J Clin Med. 2024 May 22;13(11):3048. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113048.
10
Examining the Evidence Regarding Smoking and Patient Outcomes for Isolated Meniscus Pathology: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.审视关于吸烟与孤立性半月板病变患者预后的证据:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;14(5):584. doi: 10.3390/life14050584.

本文引用的文献

1
COMBINED INSIDE-OUT AND ALL-INSIDE TECHNIQUE IN BUCKET-HANDLE MENISCUS TEARS.桶柄状半月板撕裂的内外联合与全内技术
Acta Ortop Bras. 2016 Jul-Aug;24(4):179-183. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162404156575.
2
Inside-Out Versus All-Inside Repair of Isolated Meniscal Tears: An Updated Systematic Review.孤立性半月板撕裂的由内而外修复与全内修复:一项更新的系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):234-242. doi: 10.1177/0363546516632504. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Future of 34 meniscectomies after bucket-handle meniscus tear: a retrospective study with a follow-up over 22 years.桶柄状半月板撕裂后34例半月板切除术的远期疗效:一项随访22年的回顾性研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 May;26(4):435-40. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1754-2. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Revision Meniscal Surgery in Children and Adolescents: Risk Factors and Mechanisms for Failure and Subsequent Management.儿童和青少年半月板手术翻修:失败的危险因素、机制及后续处理
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):838-43. doi: 10.1177/0363546515623511. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Influence of Health Insurance Status on the Timing of Surgery and Treatment of Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears.医疗保险状况对桶柄状半月板撕裂手术和治疗时机的影响。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 May 25;3(5):2325967115584883. doi: 10.1177/2325967115584883. eCollection 2015 May.
6
Displaced Medial and Lateral Bucket Handle Meniscal Tears With Intact ACL and PCL.伴有完整前交叉韧带和后交叉韧带的移位内侧和外侧半月板桶柄状撕裂
Orthopedics. 2015 Aug;38(8):e738-41. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150804-91.
7
Long-term outcome after all-inside meniscal repair using the RapidLoc system.使用RapidLoc系统进行全内半月板修复后的长期疗效。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 May;24(5):1495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3642-4. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle tears of medial meniscus.慢性内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复的结果。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):492-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.020.
9
Arthroscopic repair of bucket-handle tears of the lateral meniscus.关节镜下外侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修补术
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jan;23(1):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2764-9. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
10
A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair.一种全内 2 针半月板修复装置与配套的内向外缝合修复的生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):194-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513505190. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

关节镜下修复桶柄状半月板撕裂:患者特征、术后结果,以及成功与失败病例的比较。

Arthroscopically Repaired Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears: Patient Demographics, Postoperative Outcomes, and a Comparison of Success and Failure Cases.

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Cartilage. 2020 Jan;11(1):77-87. doi: 10.1177/1947603518783473. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1177/1947603518783473
PMID:29957019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6921958/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define patient demographics, preoperative, and intraoperative surgical variables associated with successful or failed repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears.

DESIGN

All patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a bucket-handle meniscus tear at a single institution between May 2011 and July 2016 with minimum 6-month follow-up were retrospectively identified. Patient demographic, preoperative (including imaging), and operative variables were collected and evaluated. A Kaplan-Meier curve was generated to demonstrate meniscus repair survivorship.

RESULTS

In total, 75 patients (78 knees) with an average age of 26.53 ± 10.67 years met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 23.41 ± 16.43 months. Fifteen knees (19.2%) suffered re-tear of the repaired meniscus at an average 12.24 ± 9.50 months postoperatively. Survival analysis demonstrated 93.6% survival at 6 months, 84.6% survival at 1 year, 78.4% survival at 2 years, and 69.9% survival at 3 years. There was significant improvement from baseline to time of final follow-up in all patient-reported outcome ( < 0.05) except Marx score ( = 0.933) and SF-12 Mental Subscale ( = 0.807). The absence of other knee pathology (including ligament tear, contralateral compartment meniscal tear, or cartilage lesions) noted intraoperatively was the only variable significantly associated with repair failure ( = 0.024). Concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (vs. no concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction) trended toward significance ( = 0.059) as a factor associated with successful repair.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of the absence of other knee pathology (including ligament tear, contralateral compartment meniscal tear, or cartilage lesions) noted intraoperatively, no other variables were significantly associated with re-tear. The results are relatively durable with 84.6% survival at 1 year. Surgeons should attempt meniscal repair when presented with a bucket-handle tear.

摘要

目的

确定与成功或失败修复桶柄状半月板撕裂相关的患者人口统计学、术前和术中手术变量。

设计

回顾性分析 2011 年 5 月至 2016 年 7 月期间在一家医疗机构接受关节镜下桶柄状半月板撕裂修复的所有患者,随访时间至少为 6 个月。收集并评估患者的人口统计学、术前(包括影像学)和手术变量。生成 Kaplan-Meier 曲线以显示半月板修复的存活率。

结果

共有 75 名(78 膝)平均年龄为 26.53 ± 10.67 岁的患者符合纳入标准。平均随访时间为 23.41 ± 16.43 个月。15 膝(19.2%)在术后平均 12.24 ± 9.50 个月时出现修复半月板再撕裂。生存分析显示 6 个月时存活率为 93.6%,1 年时存活率为 84.6%,2 年时存活率为 78.4%,3 年时存活率为 69.9%。除 Marx 评分(=0.933)和 SF-12 精神分量表(=0.807)外,所有患者报告的结果均从基线到最终随访时均有显著改善(<0.05)。术中发现无其他膝关节病变(包括韧带撕裂、对侧间室半月板撕裂或软骨病变)是与修复失败显著相关的唯一变量(=0.024)。同期行前交叉韧带重建术(与同期未行前交叉韧带重建术相比)与成功修复呈显著相关趋势(=0.059)。

结论

除术中发现无其他膝关节病变(包括韧带撕裂、对侧间室半月板撕裂或软骨病变)外,没有其他变量与再撕裂显著相关。术后 1 年的存活率为 84.6%,结果相对持久。当遇到桶柄状撕裂时,外科医生应尝试进行半月板修复。