• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者的照护目标与治疗决策的一致性。

Concordance between Goals of Care and Treatment Decisions for Persons with Dementia.

机构信息

1 Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

2 Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1442-1447. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0103. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2018.0103
PMID:29957095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6200066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing home (NH) residents with dementia experience high rates of intensive treatment near the end of life. Limited research examines whether treatment is concordant with goals of care (GOC).

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed data from the GOC trial to describe family decision makers' preferred GOC and perceptions of goal-concordant care for NH residents with late-stage dementia We compared subsequent treatment orders when families chose a primary goal of comfort versus other goals.

DESIGN

We performed a secondary analysis of data from baseline and 9-month family decision-maker interviews and chart reviews.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 302 dyads of NH residents and family decision makers in 22 North Carolina NHs were enrolled.

MEASUREMENTS

In baseline and follow-up interviews, families reported on their and NH staff's primary GOC, and perceived prognosis and goal-concordant care. Chart reviews provided data on treatment orders, hospital transfers, and hospice, which were compared after selection of a primary goal of comfort versus other goals.

RESULTS

Family chose comfort as the primary goal for 66% of residents at baseline, and for nearly 80% by 9 months or death. At baseline, 49% perceived concordance with NH staff on the primary goal, and 69% at follow-up. In multivariate models, choice of comfort as the primary goal, versus other goals, was associated with half as many hospital transfers (0.11 vs. 0.25/90 person-days, confidence interval [-0.2 to -0.01]), but not with hospice or treatment orders.

CONCLUSIONS

Most families chose comfort as the primary GOC. Further research is needed to translate this preference into comfort-focused treatment plans for late-stage dementia. Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01565642 (3/26/12).

摘要

背景

养老院(NH)中患有痴呆症的居民在生命末期接受高强度治疗的比例很高。有限的研究考察了治疗是否与护理目标(GOC)一致。

目的

我们分析了 GOC 试验的数据,以描述家庭决策者对 NH 中晚期痴呆症患者的首选 GOC 和对目标一致的护理的看法。我们比较了当家庭选择主要目标为舒适与其他目标时,随后的治疗顺序。

设计

我们对基线和 9 个月家庭决策者访谈和图表审查的数据进行了二次分析。

地点和参与者

共有 22 家北卡罗来纳州 NH 的 302 对 NH 居民和家庭决策者被纳入研究。

测量

在基线和随访访谈中,家庭报告了他们和 NH 工作人员的主要 GOC,以及对预后和目标一致的护理的看法。图表审查提供了关于治疗顺序、医院转院和临终关怀的信息,这些信息在选择主要目标为舒适与其他目标后进行了比较。

结果

家庭在基线时选择舒适作为 66%的居民的主要目标,在 9 个月或死亡时选择了近 80%的目标。在基线时,49%的人认为与 NH 工作人员在主要目标上一致,而在随访时为 69%。在多变量模型中,选择舒适作为主要目标,而不是其他目标,与医院转院的数量减少一半(0.11 比 0.25/90 人天,置信区间[-0.2 到-0.01]),但与临终关怀或治疗顺序无关。

结论

大多数家庭选择舒适作为主要的 GOC。需要进一步研究将这种偏好转化为晚期痴呆症的舒适治疗计划。Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01565642(3/26/12)。

相似文献

1
Concordance between Goals of Care and Treatment Decisions for Persons with Dementia.痴呆症患者的照护目标与治疗决策的一致性。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1442-1447. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0103. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期痴呆症护理目标干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
3
Quality of Life with Late-Stage Dementia: Exploring Opportunities to Intervene.晚期痴呆症患者的生活质量:探索干预机会。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun;67(6):1189-1196. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15794. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Perceptions of Family Decision-makers of Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia Regarding the Quality of Communication Around End-of-Life Care.患有晚期痴呆症的养老院居民的家庭决策者对临终关怀沟通质量的看法。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):879-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
5
Goals of Care or Goals of Trust? How Family Members Perceive Goals for Dying Nursing Home Residents.护理目标还是信任目标?家庭成员如何看待临终养老院居民的目标。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):360-365. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0271. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
6
Development and testing of a decision aid on goals of care for advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症护理目标决策辅助工具的开发与测试
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Apr;15(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.020. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
7
Fidelity to a behavioral intervention to improve goals of care decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.对一项行为干预措施的依从性,该措施旨在改善晚期痴呆症养老院居民的护理决策目标。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):599-604. doi: 10.1177/1740774516650863. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Level of Care Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia.养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民的护理水平偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
Comfort goal of care and end-of-life outcomes in dementia: A prospective study.痴呆症患者护理的舒适目标与临终结局:一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;29(6):538-46. doi: 10.1177/0269216315570409. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
10
Preventing Burdensome Transitions of Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia: It's More than Advance Directives.防止晚期痴呆症养老院居民的沉重过渡:这不仅仅是预先指示。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov;20(11):1205-1209. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0050. Epub 2017 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Centered Measures of Goal Concordance in Geriatrics and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.老年医学与姑息治疗中以患者为中心的目标一致性衡量方法:一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530370. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30370.
2
Knowledge, attitudes, and representations of caregivers of individuals with major neurocognitive disorders regarding palliative and end-of-life care: a narrative literature review.患有重度神经认知障碍的个体的照料者对姑息治疗和临终关怀的认知、态度及看法:一项叙述性文献综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Aug 22;24(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01862-8.
3
Planning Ahead: protocol for a randomised trial of advance care planning for community dwelling older adults at increased mortality risk.提前规划:针对社区居住的、死亡风险增加的老年人进行预先护理规划随机试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 24;15(5):e102186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102186.
4
Interventions and Predictors of Transition to Hospice for People Living With Dementia: An Integrative Review.痴呆症患者临终关怀过渡的干预措施及预测因素:一项综合综述。
Gerontologist. 2025 Apr 9;65(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf046.
5
Transfer from long-term care to acute care and risk of new permanent cognitive or physical disability among long-term care residents in Canada: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.加拿大长期护理机构居民从长期护理向急性护理的转移以及新的永久性认知或身体残疾风险:一项回顾性队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086932.
6
Development of a predictive model for loss of functional and cognitive abilities in long-term care home residents: a protocol.长期护理院居民功能和认知能力丧失预测模型的开发:一项方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):e086935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086935.
7
Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents.黑人居民在养老院接受护理讨论的及时目标方面的差异。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 15:10499091241284073. doi: 10.1177/10499091241284073.
8
A Personalized and Interactive Web-Based Advance Care Planning Intervention for Older Adults (Koda Health): Pilot Feasibility Study.个性化和互动式基于网络的老年人预先医疗照护计划干预措施(Koda Health):试点可行性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 6;7:e54128. doi: 10.2196/54128.
9
Achieving goal-concordant care: Formal and informal advance care planning for White, Black, and Hispanic older adults.实现目标一致的护理:针对白人、黑人及西班牙裔老年人的正式和非正式的预先护理计划。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2412-2422. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18971. Epub 2024 May 18.
10
Measuring the Use of End-of-Life Symptom Relief Medications in Long-Term Care Homes-a Qualitative Study.长期护理院中临终症状缓解药物使用情况的测量——一项定性研究
Can Geriatr J. 2024 Mar 1;27(1):29-46. doi: 10.5770/cgj.27.712. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Living and dying with advanced dementia: A prospective cohort study of symptoms, service use and care at the end of life.在晚期痴呆症中生活和死亡:一项关于症状、服务使用和生命末期护理的前瞻性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):668-681. doi: 10.1177/0269216317726443. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus.定义成功的预先医疗照护计划的结果:德尔菲小组共识。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):245-255.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
How Often Is End-of-Life Care in the United States Inconsistent with Patients' Goals of Care?在美国,临终关怀与患者的护理目标不一致的情况有多频繁?
J Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;20(12):1400-1404. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0065. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders in Nursing Homes: "Call the Family Instead of Calling the Ambulance".养老院中的“不要住院”医嘱:“给家属打电话,而不是叫救护车”。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1573-1577. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14879. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期痴呆症护理目标干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
6
Association of Increasing Use of Mechanical Ventilation Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia and Intensive Care Unit Beds.养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民和 ICU 床位的机械通气使用量不断增加的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1809-1816. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5964.
7
Care Consistency With Documented Care Preferences: Methodologic Considerations for Implementing the "Measuring What Matters" Quality Indicator.与记录的护理偏好的护理一致性:实施“衡量重要事项”质量指标的方法学考量
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
8
Fidelity to a behavioral intervention to improve goals of care decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.对一项行为干预措施的依从性,该措施旨在改善晚期痴呆症养老院居民的护理决策目标。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):599-604. doi: 10.1177/1740774516650863. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
9
Health Care Professionals' Responses to Religious or Spiritual Statements by Surrogate Decision Makers During Goals-of-Care Discussions.医疗保健专业人员对代理人决策者在目标关怀讨论中提出的宗教或精神问题的回应。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1662-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4124.
10
Deaths: final data for 2007.死亡情况:2007年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010 May;58(19):1-19.