• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提前规划:针对社区居住的、死亡风险增加的老年人进行预先护理规划随机试验的方案

Planning Ahead: protocol for a randomised trial of advance care planning for community dwelling older adults at increased mortality risk.

作者信息

Torke Alexia M, Hickman Susan, Wocial Lucia, Monahan Patrick O, Burke Emily S, Slaven James, Ziemba Kathleen, Montgomery Carole, Koch Sarah, Cavanaugh Melissa, Fox Ludden Emily

机构信息

Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 May 24;15(5):e102186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102186.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102186
PMID:40413042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12104946/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An important goal of advance care planning (ACP) is ensuring that patients receive care concordant with their preferences. High-quality evidence is needed about the effect of ACP on this and other outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Planning Ahead is a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of facilitated ACP in community-dwelling older adults including those with normal cognition and those with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) who are at high risk of death. The primary aim is to determine the effect of the intervention on discordance between preferences for medical treatments and the treatments received in the year after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include decision-making quality, care at the end of life and cost. Eligible patients have a primary care provider at one of two Midwest health systems, have an approximate 33% mortality risk and do not have a POLST form at baseline. Patients with capacity can invite the person they would choose to be their healthcare decision maker to participate as a study partner. A surrogate decision maker enrols and receives the intervention for patients who lack capacity due to ADRD. The intervention uses the Respecting Choices Advanced Steps (RCAS) model of ACP delivered by a registered nurse and includes identification of the patient's values and goals, education about ACP and the POLST form and the opportunity to complete a POLST form.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board. Primary and secondary analyses will be published in peer-reviewed journals. We also plan dissemination through the media. We will construct a deidentified data set that could be available to other researchers. Survey data will be preserved and shared via the NIH-supported National Archive of Computerised Data on Ageing's (NACDA) Open Ageing Repository (OAR).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04070183.

摘要

引言

预先护理计划(ACP)的一个重要目标是确保患者接受符合其偏好的护理。需要高质量的证据来证明ACP对这一结果及其他结果的影响。

方法与分析

“提前规划”是一项随机对照试验,旨在测试在社区居住的老年人中开展的辅助性ACP的有效性,这些老年人包括认知正常者以及患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)且死亡风险较高者。主要目的是确定干预措施对干预后一年内医疗治疗偏好与所接受治疗之间不一致性的影响。次要结果包括决策质量、临终护理和成本。符合条件的患者在中西部两个医疗系统之一中有一名初级保健提供者,基线时死亡风险约为33%且没有POLST表格。有行为能力的患者可以邀请他们选择的作为其医疗保健决策者的人作为研究伙伴参与。替代决策者为因ADRD而缺乏行为能力的患者登记并接受干预。干预采用由注册护士提供的“尊重选择高级步骤”(RCAS)ACP模型,包括确定患者的价值观和目标、关于ACP和POLST表格的教育以及填写POLST表格的机会。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得印第安纳大学机构审查委员会的批准。主要和次要分析将发表在同行评审期刊上。我们还计划通过媒体进行传播。我们将构建一个去识别化的数据集,可供其他研究人员使用。调查数据将通过美国国立卫生研究院支持的国家老龄化计算机化数据档案库(NACDA)的开放老龄化知识库(OAR)进行保存和共享。

试验注册号

NCT04070183。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67bb/12104946/187d5fc7ef9c/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67bb/12104946/c530e39a93fd/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67bb/12104946/187d5fc7ef9c/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67bb/12104946/c530e39a93fd/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67bb/12104946/187d5fc7ef9c/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Planning Ahead: protocol for a randomised trial of advance care planning for community dwelling older adults at increased mortality risk.提前规划:针对社区居住的、死亡风险增加的老年人进行预先护理规划随机试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 24;15(5):e102186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102186.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
9
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
10
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
An Integrative Review of the State of POLST Science: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?对POLST科学现状的综合综述:我们知道什么,又将何去何从?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Apr;25(4):557-564.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
2
The care planning umbrella: The evolution of advance care planning.护理计划总览:预先护理计划的演变
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2350-2356. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18287. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
3
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
4
Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review.剖析预先医疗照护计划结果的复杂性:我们了解什么,又该往何处去? 范围性回顾。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):234-244. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16801. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Assessment of Discordance Between Surrogate Care Goals and Medical Treatment Provided to Older Adults With Serious Illness.评估老年重病患者的替代护理目标与所提供医疗护理之间的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205179. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179.
6
Prevalence, perceived barriers and sociodemographic correlates of advance care planning in a sample of outpatients.门诊患者样本中预立医疗计划的患病率、感知障碍及社会人口学相关因素
Aust J Prim Health. 2019 Dec;26:76-80. doi: 10.1071/PY19096.
7
Predicting COPD 1-year mortality using prognostic predictors routinely measured in primary care.使用初级保健中常规测量的预后预测因子预测 COPD1 年死亡率。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 5;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1310-0.
8
A Tool to Assess Patient and Surrogate Knowledge About the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Program.用于评估患者和代理人对 POLST(维持生命治疗医师指令)计划了解程度的工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1143-1150.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
POLST Facilitation in Complex Care Management: A Feasibility Study.复杂护理管理中的POLST促进:一项可行性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;36(1):5-12. doi: 10.1177/1049909118797077. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
10
Concordance between Goals of Care and Treatment Decisions for Persons with Dementia.痴呆症患者的照护目标与治疗决策的一致性。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1442-1447. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0103. Epub 2018 Jun 29.