School of Law and Justice, University of Canberra, Australia; University of Tasmania, Australia.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Mar-Apr;63:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
This article builds on the emerging understanding of Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) probation when viewed through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ). The article commences with recent conceptualizations of TJ through the metaphor and methodology of 'wine'/'liquid' and 'bottles' (Wexler, 2014). Next, the article presents an overview of how HOPE works and clarifies a number of misconceptions about the approach taken. The article then examines the potential of the principles underlying HOPE to help in realizing the promise of mainstreaming TJ. Specifically, it is argued that HOPE is more economical than drug courts and can reach far more people. It addition, it promotes procedural justice and desistance, is flexible and can be extended across the criminal justice system.
本文通过治疗法学(therapeutic jurisprudence,TJ)的视角,探讨了夏威夷机会缓刑与执行(Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement,HOPE)缓刑的最新发展。文章首先通过“酒/液体”和“瓶子”的隐喻和方法(Wexler,2014),介绍了 TJ 的最新概念。其次,本文概述了 HOPE 的运作方式,并澄清了人们对该方法的一些误解。然后,文章探讨了 HOPE 所依据的原则在实现 TJ 主流化方面的潜力。具体而言,本文认为 HOPE 比毒品法庭更经济,能帮助更多的人,促进程序公正和改过自新,具有灵活性,并可推广到整个刑事司法系统。