Albarracin Dolores, Romer Daniel, Jones Christopher, Hall Jamieson Kathleen, Jamieson Patrick
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 29;20(6):e229. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9959.
Recent content analyses of YouTube postings reveal a proliferation of user generated videos with misleading statements about the health consequences of various types of nontraditional tobacco use (eg, electronic cigarettes; e-cigarettes).
This research was aimed at obtaining evidence about the potential effects of YouTube postings about tobacco products on viewers' attitudes toward these products.
A sample of young adults recruited online (N=350) viewed one of four highly viewed YouTube videos containing misleading health statements about chewing tobacco, e-cigarettes, hookahs, and pipe smoking, as well as a control YouTube video unrelated to tobacco products.
The videos about e-cigarettes and hookahs led to more positive attitudes toward the featured products than did control videos. However, these effects did not fully translate into attitudes toward combustive cigarette smoking, although the pipe video led to more positive attitudes toward combustive smoking than did the chewing and the hookah videos, and the e-cigarette video led to more positive attitudes toward combustive cigarette smoking than did the chewing video.
This research revealed young people's reactions to misleading claims about tobacco products featured in popular YouTube videos. Policy implications are discussed.
最近对YouTube上发布内容的分析显示,用户生成的视频大量涌现,其中包含有关各类非传统烟草使用(如电子烟)对健康影响的误导性陈述。
本研究旨在获取关于YouTube上有关烟草产品的帖子对观众对这些产品态度的潜在影响的证据。
在线招募的一组年轻成年人(N = 350)观看了四个浏览量很高的YouTube视频之一,这些视频包含有关嚼烟、电子烟、水烟和烟斗吸烟的误导性健康陈述,以及一个与烟草产品无关的对照YouTube视频。
关于电子烟和水烟的视频比对照视频导致对特色产品更积极的态度。然而,这些影响并未完全转化为对燃烧香烟吸烟的态度,尽管烟斗视频比嚼烟和水烟视频导致对燃烧吸烟更积极的态度,并且电子烟视频比嚼烟视频导致对燃烧香烟吸烟更积极的态度。
本研究揭示了年轻人对热门YouTube视频中有关烟草产品的误导性声明的反应。讨论了政策含义。