National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation.
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation.
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:178-191. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Although objects around us vary in a number of continuous dimensions (color, size, orientation, etc.), we tend to perceive the objects using more discrete, categorical descriptions (e.g., berries and leaves). Previously, we described how continuous ensemble statistics of simple features are transformed into categorical classes: The visual system tests whether the feature distribution has one or several peaks, each representing a likely "category". Here, we tested the mechanism of segmentation for more complex conjunctions of features. Observers discriminated between two textures filled with lines of various lengths and orientations, which had same distributions between the textures, but opposite directions of correlations. Critically, feature distributions could be "segmentable" (only extreme feature values and a large gap between them) or "non-segmentable" (both extreme and middle values with smooth transition are present). Segmentable displays yielded steeper psychometric functions indicating better discrimination (Experiment 1). The effect of segmentability arises early in visual processing (Experiment 2) and is likely to be provided by global sampling of the entire field (Experiment 3). Also, rapid segmentation requires both feature dimensions having a "segmentable" distribution supporting division of the textures into categorical classes of conjunctions. We propose that observers select items from one side (peak) of one dimension and sample mean differences along a second dimension within the selected subset. In this scenario, subset selection is a limiting factor (Experiment 4) of texture discrimination. Yet, segmentability provided by the sharp feature distributions seems to facilitate both subset selection and mean comparison.
虽然我们周围的物体在许多连续的维度上(颜色、大小、方向等)有所不同,但我们倾向于使用更离散的、分类的描述来感知物体(例如,浆果和树叶)。之前,我们描述了简单特征的连续整体统计数据如何转换为分类类别:视觉系统测试特征分布是否有一个或多个峰值,每个峰值代表一个可能的“类别”。在这里,我们测试了更复杂特征组合的分割机制。观察者在两种充满不同长度和方向线条的纹理之间进行区分,这两种纹理在纹理之间具有相同的分布,但相关性的方向相反。关键是,特征分布可以是“可分割的”(只有极端特征值和它们之间的大差距)或“不可分割的”(极端和中间值都存在,且过渡平滑)。可分割的显示产生了更陡峭的心理物理函数,表明了更好的辨别力(实验 1)。这种可分割性的影响在视觉处理的早期就出现了(实验 2),并且很可能是通过对整个视野的全局采样提供的(实验 3)。此外,快速分割需要两个特征维度都具有“可分割”的分布,以支持将纹理分为分类类别的组合。我们提出,观察者从一个维度的一侧(峰值)选择项目,并在所选子集中沿第二个维度采样均值差异。在这种情况下,子集选择是纹理辨别力的限制因素(实验 4)。然而,由锐利特征分布提供的可分割性似乎既促进了子集选择,也促进了均值比较。