Suppr超能文献

清热解毒颗粒治疗风热证普通感冒的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、双模拟、阳性对照试验

Efficacy and safety of Reduqing granules in the treatment of common cold with wind-heat syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-controlled trial.

作者信息

Ma Yanjiao, Zhang Zhongyi, Wei Lianbo, He Shuai, Deng Xun, Ji Aimin, Zhou Benjie, Jiang Deqi, Li Mingxing, Wang Yong

出版信息

J Tradit Chin Med. 2017 Apr;37(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(17)30043-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of Reduqing granules in patients with common cold with wind-heat syndrome (CCWHS).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel, positive- controlled trial included 72 CCWHS patients was performed. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups, Reduqing (RDQ) group and Lianhuaqingwen (LHQW) group, in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in RDQ group received Reduqing granules and dummy Lianhuaqingwen capsules three times a day and patients in LHQW group received Lianhuaqingwen capsules and dummy Reduqing granules three times daily. The duration of treatment and follow-up were four days.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in total markedly effective rate and total effective rate between RDQ group and LHQW group after treatment. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) symptom score was significantly reduced after treatment in RDQ group, as well as in LHQW group. However, the difference of change in TCM symptom score between two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in the median time to fever relief [RDQ group (4 ± 8) h vs LHQW group (4 ± 5) h] or the median time to fever clearance (RDQ group 47 h vs LHQW 36 h). No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

Compared with Lianhuaqingwen capsules, Reduqing granules achieved similar therapeutic effect in the treatment of CCWHS and no drug-related adverse events were reported during the study. Therefore, Reduqing granules might be effective and safe in the treatment of CCWHS.

摘要

目的

评估清热解毒颗粒治疗风热犯表型感冒(CCWHS)的有效性和安全性。

方法

进行了一项随机、双盲、双模拟、平行、阳性对照试验,纳入72例CCWHS患者。参与者按1:1比例随机分为两组,清热解毒(RDQ)组和连花清瘟(LHQW)组。RDQ组患者每日3次服用清热解毒颗粒和模拟连花清瘟胶囊,LHQW组患者每日3次服用连花清瘟胶囊和模拟清热解毒颗粒。治疗和随访时间为4天。

结果

治疗后,RDQ组与LHQW组的总显效率和总有效率无统计学显著差异。RDQ组和LHQW组治疗后中医症状评分均显著降低。然而,两组中医症状评分变化的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组在退热中位时间[RDQ组(4±8)小时 vs LHQW组(4±5)小时]或退热中位时间(RDQ组47小时 vs LHQW组36小时)方面无显著差异。研究期间未报告严重不良事件。

结论

与连花清瘟胶囊相比,清热解毒颗粒在治疗CCWHS方面取得了相似的治疗效果,且研究期间未报告与药物相关的不良事件。因此,清热解毒颗粒治疗CCWHS可能有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffa2/7147198/ccad2528bf1c/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验