UCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
North Thames CLAHRC, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e022260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022260.
Little is known about how care home staff understand and respond to distress in residents living with dementia labelled as agitation. The aim of this study was to describe how care home staff understand and respond to agitation and the factors that determine how it is managed.
We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis.
We recruited staff from six care homes in South East England including residential and nursing homes of differing sizes run by both the private and charity sector and located in urban and rural areas.
We interviewed 25 care home staff using purposive sampling to include staff of either sex, differing age, ethnicity, nationality and with different roles and experience.
We identified four overarching themes: (1) behaviours expressing unmet need; (2) staff emotional responses to agitation; (3) understanding the individual helps and (4) constraints on staff responses. Staff struggled with the paradox of trying to connect with the personhood of residents while seeing the person as separate to and, therefore, not responsible for their behaviours. Staff often felt powerless, frightened and overwhelmed, and their responses were constrained by care home structures, processes and a culture of fear and scrutiny.
Responding to agitation expressed by residents was not a linear process and staff faced tensions and dilemmas in deciding how to respond, especially when initial strategies were unsuccessful or when attempts to respond to residents' needs were inhibited by structural and procedural constraints in the care home. Future trials of psychosocial interventions should support staff to identify and respond to residents' unmet needs and include how staff can look after themselves.
对于养老院工作人员如何理解和应对被贴上“激越”标签的痴呆症居民的痛苦,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在描述养老院工作人员如何理解和应对激越,以及决定如何管理激越的因素。
我们进行了定性主题分析。
我们从英格兰东南部的六家养老院招募了工作人员,包括由私营和慈善部门运营的不同规模的住宅和护理院,位于城市和农村地区。
我们采用目的性抽样采访了 25 名养老院工作人员,包括不同性别、年龄、种族、国籍、角色和经验的工作人员。
我们确定了四个总体主题:(1)表达未满足需求的行为;(2)工作人员对激越的情绪反应;(3)理解个体有助于(4)工作人员反应的限制。工作人员在试图与居民的人格联系,同时又将其视为与自己不同的个体,因此不对其行为负责这一两难困境中挣扎。工作人员常常感到无能为力、恐惧和不知所措,他们的反应受到养老院结构、流程以及恐惧和审查文化的限制。
对居民表达的激越做出反应不是一个线性过程,工作人员在决定如何做出反应时面临着紧张和困境,尤其是当最初的策略不成功时,或者当试图满足居民的需求受到养老院结构和程序限制时。未来的心理社会干预试验应支持工作人员识别和应对居民的未满足需求,并包括工作人员如何照顾自己。