School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 1;68(4):623-631. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy541.
The 2016-17 epidemic of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus was alarming, due to the surge in reported cases across a wide geographic area and the emergence of highly-pathogenic A(H7N9) viruses. Our study aimed to assess whether the human-to-human transmission risk of A(H7N9) virus has changed across the 5 waves since 2013.
Data on human cases and clusters of A(H7N9) virus infection were collected from the World Health Organization, open access national and provincial reports, informal online sources, and published literature. We compared the epidemiological characteristics of sporadic and cluster cases, estimated the relative risk (RR) of infection in blood relatives and non-blood relatives, and estimated the bounds on the effective reproductive number (Re) across waves from 2013 through September 2017.
We identified 40 human clusters of A(H7N9) virus infection, with a median cluster size of 2 (range 2-3). The overall RR of infection in blood relatives versus non-blood relatives was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88, 3.09), and was not significantly different across waves (χ2 = 2.66, P = .617). The upper limit of Re for A(H7N9) virus was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.14) and was not significantly different across waves (χ2 = 1.52, P = .822).
The small cluster size and low Re suggest that human-to-human transmissibility of A(H7N9) virus has not changed over time and remains limited to date. Continuous assessment of A(H7N9) virus infections and human case clusters is of crucial importance for public health.
2016-17 年的人感染甲型流感病毒 A(H7N9)疫情令人震惊,原因是报告病例在广泛的地理区域内激增,以及出现了高致病性 A(H7N9)病毒。我们的研究旨在评估自 2013 年以来的 5 波疫情中,A(H7N9)病毒的人际传播风险是否发生了变化。
从世界卫生组织、公开获取的国家和省级报告、非正式在线来源和已发表的文献中收集了人感染 A(H7N9)病毒病例和聚集感染的数据。我们比较了散发病例和聚集性病例的流行病学特征,估计了血缘亲属和非血缘亲属感染的相对风险(RR),并估计了 2013 年至 2017 年 9 月期间各波次的有效繁殖数(Re)的范围。
我们确定了 40 个人感染 A(H7N9)病毒的聚集性感染,聚集性感染的中位数为 2 例(范围 2-3 例)。血缘亲属与非血缘亲属感染的 RR 总体为 1.65(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.88,3.09),且各波次之间无显著差异(χ2=2.66,P=0.617)。A(H7N9)病毒的 Re 上限为 0.12(95% CI:0.10,0.14),且各波次之间无显著差异(χ2=1.52,P=0.822)。
较小的聚集规模和较低的 Re 表明,A(H7N9)病毒的人际传播性尚未随时间而改变,且截至目前仍受到限制。持续评估 A(H7N9)病毒感染和人类病例聚集感染对公共卫生至关重要。