Antin Tamar M J, Annechino Rachelle, Hunt Geoffrey, Lipperman-Kreda Sharon, Young Malisa
Center for Critical Public Health, Prevention Research Center, 180 Grand, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612.
Center for Critical Public Health, Institute for Scientific Analysis, Suite 211, 1150 Ballena Blvd, Alameda, CA 94501.
Crit Public Health. 2017;27(4):443-454. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1249825. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Tobacco denormalization is a widely accepted tobacco control strategy, shaping policies and programs throughout the United States as well as globally. In spite of widespread beliefs about the effectiveness of tobacco denormalization approaches, concerns about their emphasis on stigmatization have emerged. Social science research on smoking stigma raises questions about the potential iatrogenic consequences of tobacco denormalization approaches. Few studies have considered how smoking stigma may be internalized differently by different people, particularly those who experience stigmatization because of other socially-ascribed makers of inequity (e.g. race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality). The intersection of multiple stigmas may work to intensify the "social isolation and marginalization" that some people already experience (Greaves & Hemsing 2009; pg S127). This paper presents results from a pattern-level analysis of focus group and interview data from a study investigating smoking-related stigma and perceptions of tobacco denormalization approaches among 15 low income Black women who smoke in the San Francisco Bay Area. Our analysis revealed a cycle where Black women's experiences with structural oppression resulted in stress and the use of cigarettes to cope with that stress. Though the connection between smoking and stress is well documented in previous research, our analysis further revealed the additional contribution of the stigmatization of smoking and how it intensifies inequity for Black women who smoke. Implications of these findings for tobacco control and prevention are discussed.
烟草去常态化是一项被广泛接受的控烟策略,在美国乃至全球塑造着相关政策和项目。尽管人们普遍相信烟草去常态化方法的有效性,但对其强调污名化的担忧也随之出现。关于吸烟污名化的社会科学研究对烟草去常态化方法可能产生的医源性后果提出了疑问。很少有研究考虑不同的人对吸烟污名化的内化方式可能存在差异,尤其是那些因其他社会赋予的不平等特征(如种族、民族、性别、性取向)而遭受污名化的人。多种污名的交织可能会加剧一些人已经经历的“社会孤立和边缘化”(格里夫斯和赫姆辛,2009年;第S127页)。本文展示了一项模式层面分析的结果,该分析基于对15名旧金山湾区低收入吸烟黑人女性进行的焦点小组和访谈数据,这些数据来自一项调查吸烟相关污名化以及对烟草去常态化方法看法的研究。我们的分析揭示了一个循环,即黑人女性的结构性压迫经历导致压力,她们通过吸烟来应对这种压力。尽管吸烟与压力之间的联系在先前的研究中有充分记录,但我们的分析进一步揭示了吸烟污名化的额外影响,以及它如何加剧了吸烟黑人女性的不平等状况。本文还讨论了这些发现对烟草控制和预防的启示。