Evans-Polce Rebecca J, Castaldelli-Maia Joao M, Schomerus Georg, Evans-Lacko Sara E
The Methodology Center and Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, Fundação do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;145:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.026. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Little is known about the consequences of tobacco smoking stigma on smokers and how smokers may internalize smoking-related stigma. This review summarizes existing literature on tobacco smoking self-stigma, investigating to what extent smokers are aware of negative stereotypes, agree with them and apply them to themselves.
We carried out a systematic search of Pubmed/Web of Science/PsycInfo databases for articles related to smoking self-stigma through June 2013. Reference lists and citations of included studies were also checked and experts were contacted. After screening articles for inclusion/exclusion criteria we performed a quality assessment and summarized findings according to the stages of self-stigma as conceptualized in Corrigan's progressive model of self-stigma (aware, agree, apply and harm). Initial searches yielded 570 articles.
Thirty of these articles (18 qualitative and 12 quantitative studies) met criteria for our review. Awareness of smoking stigma was virtually universal across studies. Coping strategies for smoking stigma and the degree to which individuals who smoke internalized this stigma varied both within and across studies. There was considerable variation in positive, negative, and non-significant consequences associated with smoking self-stigma. Limited evidence was found for subgroup differences in smoking-related stigma.
While there is some evidence that smoking self-stigma leads to reductions in smoking, this review also identified significant negative consequences of smoking self-stigma. Future research should assess the factors related to differences in how individuals respond to smoking stigma. Public health strategies which limit the stigmatization of smokers may be warranted.
对于吸烟污名对吸烟者的影响以及吸烟者如何内化与吸烟相关的污名,我们知之甚少。本综述总结了关于吸烟自我污名的现有文献,调查吸烟者在多大程度上意识到负面刻板印象、认同这些刻板印象并将其应用于自身。
我们对PubMed/Web of Science/PsycInfo数据库进行了系统检索,以查找截至2013年6月与吸烟自我污名相关的文章。还检查了纳入研究的参考文献列表和引用情况,并联系了专家。在根据纳入/排除标准筛选文章后,我们进行了质量评估,并根据科里根自我污名渐进模型(意识、认同、应用和伤害)中概念化的自我污名阶段总结了研究结果。初步检索得到570篇文章。
其中30篇文章(18篇定性研究和12篇定量研究)符合我们的综述标准。在各项研究中,对吸烟污名的认知几乎是普遍存在的。吸烟污名的应对策略以及吸烟者内化这种污名的程度在研究内部和研究之间都有所不同。与吸烟自我污名相关的积极、消极和无显著影响存在相当大的差异。关于吸烟相关污名的亚组差异,证据有限。
虽然有一些证据表明吸烟自我污名会导致吸烟减少,但本综述也确定了吸烟自我污名的重大负面影响。未来的研究应该评估与个体对吸烟污名反应差异相关的因素。可能有必要采取限制对吸烟者污名化的公共卫生策略。