• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致儿童做噩梦的因素:创伤、焦虑、分离和情绪调节。

Contributing factors predicting nightmares in children: Trauma, anxiety, dissociation, and emotion regulation.

机构信息

Clinical Psychology Department.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2019 Jan;11(1):114-121. doi: 10.1037/tra0000387. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1037/tra0000387
PMID:29963889
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is little research in the current literature regarding contributing factors to nightmares in children. This study aimed to test potentially overlapping predictors of nightmare distress and severity, including anxiety, dissociation, trauma history, vagal tone, and parental processing of emotions.

METHOD

Sixty parent-child dyads (children ages 6-11) filled out a variety of child-report and parent-observation inventories on nightmare frequency and distress, dissociation, anxiety, and trauma history of the child. Children were monitored on heart rate variability and vagal tone. Both parent and child participated in a discussion of positive and negative life events that were later coded for degree of parent processing of emotional information.

RESULTS

Anxiety, trauma history, dissociation, and baseline vagal tone accounted for 39% of the variance in nightmare distress. Anxiety and dissociation were positive predictors of nightmare distress in the multiple regression. Parent processing variables were weak predictors in the current analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive power of anxiety, dissociation, vagal tone, and trauma history was not entirely due to their overlap, as shown by uniquely significant beta weights in the prediction of distress. Treatment procedures with multiple intervention points targeting physiological and psychological sources of nightmare distress may be warranted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

目前的文献中几乎没有关于儿童噩梦的影响因素的研究。本研究旨在测试噩梦困扰和严重程度的潜在重叠预测因素,包括焦虑、分离、创伤史、迷走神经张力和父母对情绪的处理。

方法

60 对亲子(年龄 6-11 岁)填写了各种儿童报告和父母观察的噩梦频率和困扰、分离、焦虑和儿童创伤史的问卷。儿童的心率变异性和迷走神经张力受到监测。父母和孩子都参与了关于积极和消极生活事件的讨论,这些事件后来根据父母对情绪信息的处理程度进行了编码。

结果

焦虑、创伤史、分离和基线迷走神经张力占噩梦困扰的 39%。焦虑和分离在多元回归中是噩梦困扰的正向预测因子。父母处理变量在当前分析中是较弱的预测因子。

结论

焦虑、分离、迷走神经张力和创伤史的预测能力并非完全归因于它们的重叠,因为在预测困扰方面,β权重具有独特的显著性。针对噩梦困扰的生理和心理来源的具有多个干预点的治疗程序可能是必要的。(选自《心理科学》,2018 年,第 41 卷,第 4 期,第 754-760 页。)

相似文献

1
Contributing factors predicting nightmares in children: Trauma, anxiety, dissociation, and emotion regulation.导致儿童做噩梦的因素:创伤、焦虑、分离和情绪调节。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Jan;11(1):114-121. doi: 10.1037/tra0000387. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well-being.噩梦频率和噩梦困扰与幸福感的关系。
J Sleep Res. 2004 Jun;13(2):129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00394.x.
3
Implications of language use in posttraumatic nightmares on psychological symptoms.语言使用对创伤后噩梦与心理症状的影响。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Feb;16(2):312-320. doi: 10.1037/tra0001266. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Nightmare prevalence, nightmare distress, and self-reported psychological disturbance.噩梦发生率、噩梦困扰及自我报告的心理障碍。
Sleep. 2002 Mar 15;25(2):205-12.
5
Self-Reported Psychopathology, Trauma Symptoms, and Emotion Coping Among Child Suicide Attempters and Ideators: An Exploratory Study of Young Children.儿童自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者的自我报告精神病理学、创伤症状和情绪应对:对幼儿的探索性研究。
Arch Suicide Res. 2016;20(2):160-75. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1004469. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
6
Nightmares and dissociative experiences: the key role of childhood traumatic events.噩梦与解离体验:童年创伤事件的关键作用。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003 Apr;57(2):139-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01093.x.
7
Nightmares and anxiety in elementary-aged children: is there a relationship.小学阶段儿童的噩梦与焦虑:二者存在关联吗?
Child Care Health Dev. 2002 Jul;28(4):317-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00274.x.
8
Differentiating Single and Multiple Suicide Attempters: What Nightmares Can Tell Us That Other Predictors Cannot.区分单次和多次自杀未遂者:其他预测因素无法告诉我们的噩梦。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 May 15;14(5):829-834. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7116.
9
Nightmare distress revisited: Cognitive appraisal of nightmares according to Lazarus' transactional model of stress.噩梦困扰再探:根据拉扎勒斯的应激的认知交互模型对噩梦进行认知评估。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101517. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101517. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Nightmare distress is related to traumatic childhood experiences, critical life events and emotional appraisal of a dream rather than to its content.噩梦困扰与童年创伤经历、重大生活事件以及对梦境的情感评估有关,而非与梦境内容有关。
J Sleep Res. 2023 Jun;32(3):e13779. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13779. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Children and Adolescents with Insomnia and Comorbid Nightmares-A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Samples with an Age Range from 0 to 18 Years.患有失眠症和共病噩梦的儿童及青少年的特征——对年龄范围在0至18岁的临床样本的二次分析
Children (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;12(2):129. doi: 10.3390/children12020129.
2
The vision of dreams: from ontogeny to dream engineering in blindness.梦境的愿景:从胚胎发育到盲态下的梦境工程。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Aug 1;18(8):2051-2062. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10026.
3
Distance support and online intervention to blind and visually impaired children during the pandemic COVID-19.
疫情期间对盲童和视障儿童的远程支持和在线干预。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Jan;108:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103816. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
4
Disturbing Dreams and Psychosocial Maladjustment in Children: A Prospective Study of the Moderating Role of Early Negative Emotionality.儿童的多梦与心理社会适应不良:早期消极情绪调节作用的前瞻性研究
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 7;11:762. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00762. eCollection 2020.
5
Nightmares in Treatment-Seeking Youth: the Role of Cumulative Trauma Exposure.寻求治疗的青少年的噩梦:累积创伤暴露的作用。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Jun 18;13(2):249-256. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00268-y. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Psychopathological problems related to the COVID-19 pandemic and possible prevention with music therapy.与新冠疫情相关的精神病理问题及音乐疗法的可能预防作用
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Aug;109(8):1516-1518. doi: 10.1111/apa.15346. Epub 2020 Jun 1.