Xu Guo-Xin, Wang Zi-Fang, Gao Ming, Tian Dong, Huang Rong, Liu Jiang, Li Jia-Cheng
College of Resource and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Jan 8;39(1):355-362. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201705217.
The aim of this work is to understand the effects of straw and biochar return in soil on the content, distribution, stability, and relative contribution rate of organic carbon for soil aggregates, which could be used to better understanding the stability of the soil carbon pool and the protection mechanisms under straw and biochar return. In this study, a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of straw and biochar return on soil aggregates and carbon sequestration characteristics in a rape-maize rotation planting system. Five treatments, including a control (no organic material added, CK), straw (CS), straw and microorganism (CSD), Biochar (BC), half straw and half biochar (CSBC), were used. The results indicated that ① Straw and biochar could improve the content of soil organic carbon, and the BC and CSBC treatments increased it by 16.88-17.37 g·kg, values higher than those with the CS and CSD treatments (13.76-14.68 g·kg); ② Compared with the CK treatment, CS and CSD treatments could increase the stability of the aggregates through significantly increasing the content of macro-aggregate by 94.00%-117.78% and significantly increasing the mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), and R of water stable aggregates, but reducing the D value (<0.05); and ③ With the increase in aggregate particle size, the content of organic carbon in the aggregates decreased first and then increased. The contribution rate of soil organic carbon in silt and clay was the highest (29.61%-42.18%), and the contribution rate of organic carbon in the macro-aggregate was the lowest (9.19%-17.81%). In addition to the CSD treatment, the CS, BC, and CSBC treatments reduced the contribution of larger aggregates (2-0.25 mm) and micro-aggregates (0.25-0.053 mm). In general, the benefit of straw return was better than that of biochar in promoting soil aggregation. However, the application of biochar was better than straw in improving the aggregates organic carbon content. The newly generated carbon from straw degradation was mainly distributed in large aggregates. Straw with microorganisms could promote the combination of carbon by different components in the larger aggregates. The carbon from biochar and straw with biochar treatments were mainly concentrated in micro-aggregates.
本研究旨在了解秸秆和生物炭还田对土壤团聚体有机碳含量、分布、稳定性及相对贡献率的影响,以便更好地理解秸秆和生物炭还田条件下土壤碳库的稳定性及保护机制。本研究通过田间试验,研究了秸秆和生物炭还田对油菜-玉米轮作种植系统中土壤团聚体及碳固存特征的影响。试验设置了5个处理,包括对照(不添加有机物料,CK)、秸秆(CS)、秸秆与微生物(CSD)、生物炭(BC)、半量秸秆与半量生物炭(CSBC)。结果表明:①秸秆和生物炭均能提高土壤有机碳含量,BC和CSBC处理增加了16.88 - 17.37 g·kg,高于CS和CSD处理(13.76 - 14.68 g·kg);②与CK处理相比,CS和CSD处理通过显著增加大团聚体含量94.00% - 117.78%,显著增加水稳性团聚体的平均重量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径(GMD)和R值,但降低D值(<0.05),从而提高了团聚体的稳定性;③随着团聚体粒径增大,团聚体中有机碳含量先降低后升高。粉粒和黏粒中土壤有机碳贡献率最高(29.61% - 42.18%),大团聚体中有机碳贡献率最低(9.19% - 17.81%)。除CSD处理外,CS、BC和CSBC处理降低了较大团聚体(2 - 0.25 mm)和微团聚体(0.25 - 0.053 mm)的贡献率。总体而言,秸秆还田在促进土壤团聚方面的效果优于生物炭。然而,生物炭在提高团聚体有机碳含量方面优于秸秆。秸秆降解产生的新碳主要分布在大团聚体中。秸秆与微生物组合能促进大团聚体中不同组分碳的结合。生物炭以及秸秆与生物炭处理的碳主要集中在微团聚体中。