Tian Dong, Gao Ming, Huang Rong, Lü Sheng, Xu Chang
College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Chongqing Municipal Tobacco Company, Chongqing 400023, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Jul 8;38(7):2988-2999. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201612188.
Soil respiration has become the main way of farmland ecosystem carbon emissions. Soil respiration and its responses to soil moisture and soil temperature under straw and biochar returning were investigated. Combined soil CO fluxes system(ACE-002/OPZ/SC) with the method of root exclusion, this study conducted a long-term field experiment in the national monitor station of soil fertility and fertilizer efficiency of purple soils. The total soil respiration and heterotrophic respiration rate and the soil hydrothermal factors were measured during the growth period of rape and maize in rape-maize rotation systems, and the difference between total soil respiration and heterotrophic respiration was calculated as the contribution of root respiration to soil respiration. There were five treatments including CK(no organic material), CS(straw), CSD(straw+microorganism), BC(biochar), CSBC(50%straw+50%biochar), which were replicated three times. The results showed that straw and biochar returning significantly affected the seasonal variations and the peak of soil respiration. In addition to BC treatment, other treatments promoted soil respiration and cumulative emissions of soil CO. Soil respiration rate was significantly different under different treatments, the changes in soil respiration rates showed a single peak curve under all treatments, the seasonal variations in soil respiration rates under rape was 0.12-2.29 μmol·(m·s), displaying an order of CS > CSD > CSBC > CK > BC. Soil respiration was pretty complex in maize season, the seasonal variation in soil respiration rates under rape was 1.02-15.32 μmol·(m·s), displaying an order of CSD > CS > CSBC > CK > BC, the changes in soil respiration rate presented a double peak curve under CS and CSD and CSBC treatments and a single peak curve under BC and CK treatments. Heterotrophic respiration could explain 86.50%-93.94% of seasonal variations in the soil total respiration, and the contribution of root respiration(26.49%-32.86%) was significantly lower than CK treatment(53.65%).Straw and biochar returning did not change soil temperature and soil moisture. Soil temperature at 5 cm depth had significant effects on the change dynamics of soil respiration rates, but soil moisture did not. Soil temperature at 5 cm depth could explain 82%-94% of the variations in soil respiration. The values of temperature sensitivity coefficient changed from 3.28 to 4.47. Compared with CK treatment, of CS, CSD and CSBC decreased by 26.62%, 18.12%, 20.58%, respectively, while BC increased by 12.53%. There was no synergistic effect between soil temperature and soil moisture on soil respiration, the dynamic changes of soil respiration rate could be simulated by single factor index function of soil temperature. Overall, soil respiration was significantly promoted by returning of straw, straw+microorganism, straw+biochar, while it was inhibited by returning of biochar.
土壤呼吸已成为农田生态系统碳排放的主要方式。本研究对秸秆和生物炭还田条件下土壤呼吸及其对土壤水分和土壤温度的响应进行了调查。结合土壤CO通量系统(ACE - 002/OPZ/SC)与根系排除法,在国家紫色土土壤肥力与肥料效益监测站开展了长期田间试验。在油菜 - 玉米轮作系统中,于油菜和玉米生长期间测定了土壤总呼吸、异养呼吸速率及土壤水热因子,并计算总呼吸与异养呼吸的差值作为根系呼吸对土壤呼吸的贡献。试验设置了5个处理,包括CK(不施有机物料)、CS(秸秆)、CSD(秸秆 + 微生物)、BC(生物炭)、CSBC(50%秸秆 + 50%生物炭),每个处理重复3次。结果表明,秸秆和生物炭还田显著影响土壤呼吸的季节变化和峰值。除BC处理外,其他处理均促进了土壤呼吸及土壤CO的累积排放。不同处理下土壤呼吸速率差异显著,所有处理下土壤呼吸速率变化均呈单峰曲线,油菜季土壤呼吸速率的季节变化范围为0.12 - 2.29 μmol·(m²·s),表现为CS > CSD > CSBC > CK > BC。玉米季土壤呼吸情况较为复杂,油菜季土壤呼吸速率的季节变化范围为1.02 - 15.32 μmol·(m²·s),表现为CSD > CS > CSBC > CK > BC,CS、CSD和CSBC处理下土壤呼吸速率变化呈双峰曲线,BC和CK处理下呈单峰曲线。异养呼吸可解释土壤总呼吸季节变化的86.50% - 93.94%,根系呼吸的贡献(26.49% - 32.86%)显著低于CK处理(53.65%)。秸秆和生物炭还田未改变土壤温度和土壤水分。5 cm深度处的土壤温度对土壤呼吸速率的变化动态有显著影响,而土壤水分无显著影响。5 cm深度处的土壤温度可解释土壤呼吸变化的82% - 94%。温度敏感性系数值在3.28至4.47之间变化。与CK处理相比,CS、CSD和CSBC的该系数分别降低了26.62%、18.12%、20.58%,而BC增加了12.53%。土壤温度和土壤水分对土壤呼吸不存在协同效应,土壤呼吸速率的动态变化可用土壤温度的单因子指数函数模拟。总体而言,秸秆、秸秆 + 微生物、秸秆 + 生物炭还田显著促进了土壤呼吸,而生物炭还田则抑制了土壤呼吸。