Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, USA; School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, USA; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia.
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.080. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Humans recognize faces with ease, despite the complexity of the task and of the visual system which underlies it. Different spatial regions, including both the core and extended face processing networks, and distinct temporal stages of processing have been implicated in face recognition, but there is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which the mechanisms for recognizing a familiar face differ from those for an unfamiliar face. Here, we used electroencephalogram (EEG) and flicker SSVEP, a high signal-to-noise approach, and searchlight decoding methods to elucidate the mechanisms mediating the processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the time domain. Familiar and unfamiliar faces were presented periodically at 15 Hz, 6 Hz and 3.75 Hz either upright or inverted in separate blocks, with the rationale that faster frequencies require shorter processing times per image and tap into fundamentally different levels of visual processing. The 15 Hz trials, likely to reflect early visual processing, exhibited enhanced neural responses for familiar over unfamiliar face trials, but only when the faces were upright. In contrast, decoding methods revealed similar classification accuracies for upright and inverted faces for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. For the 6 Hz frequency, familiar faces had lower amplitude responses than unfamiliar faces, and decoding familiarity was more accurate for upright compared with inverted faces. Finally, the 3.75 Hz frequency revealed no main effects of familiarity, but decoding showed significant correlations with behavioral ratings of face familiarity, suggesting that activity evoked by this slow presentation frequency reflected higher-level, cognitive aspects of familiarity processing. This three-way dissociation between frequencies reveals that fundamentally different stages of the visual hierarchy are modulated by face familiarity. The combination of experimental and analytical approaches used here represent a novel method for elucidating spatio-temporal characteristics within the visual system.
人类能够轻松地识别面孔,尽管这项任务和支撑它的视觉系统都非常复杂。不同的空间区域,包括核心和扩展的面部处理网络,以及不同的处理时间阶段,都与面部识别有关,但对于识别熟悉面孔和不熟悉面孔的机制在多大程度上有所不同,仍存在争议。在这里,我们使用脑电图(EEG)和闪烁 SSVEP,一种高信噪比的方法,以及搜索灯解码方法,在时域中阐明介导熟悉和不熟悉面孔处理的机制。熟悉和不熟悉的面孔以 15 Hz、6 Hz 和 3.75 Hz 的频率周期性地呈现,无论是直立还是倒置,都在单独的块中呈现,其原理是更快的频率需要每幅图像的处理时间更短,并利用视觉处理的基本不同层次。15 Hz 的试验可能反映了早期的视觉处理,表现出对熟悉面孔试验的神经反应增强,而仅当面孔直立时才会如此。相比之下,解码方法显示,对于熟悉和不熟悉的面孔,直立和倒置的面孔具有相似的分类准确性。对于 6 Hz 的频率,熟悉的面孔的振幅响应低于不熟悉的面孔,并且对于直立的面孔,解码熟悉度比倒置的面孔更准确。最后,3.75 Hz 的频率没有表现出熟悉的主要影响,但解码显示与面孔熟悉度的行为评分显著相关,这表明这种缓慢呈现频率引起的活动反映了熟悉度处理的更高层次、认知方面。这种频率的三向分离表明,视觉层次结构的基本不同阶段受到面孔熟悉度的调节。这里使用的实验和分析方法的结合代表了一种阐明视觉系统内时空特征的新方法。