Suppr超能文献

人类与移动应用程序界面交互时的注意力分配。

Attention allocation on mobile app interfaces when human interacts with them.

作者信息

Zhu Li, Cui Gaochao, Li Yan, Zhang Jianhai, Kong Wanzeng, Cichocki Andrzej, Li Junhua

机构信息

Computer & Software School, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310018 China.

Key Laboratory of Brain Machine Collaborative Intelligence of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou Dianzi University, 310018 Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Aug;16(4):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09760-4. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

Abstract

With the popularity of smartphones and the pervasion of mobile apps, people spend more and more time to interact with a diversity of apps on their smartphones, especially for young population. This raises a question: how people allocate attention to interfaces of apps during using them. To address this question, we, in this study, designed an experiment with two sessions (i.e., Session1: browsing original interfaces; Session 2: browsing interfaces after removal of colors and background) integrating with an eyetracking system. Attention fixation durations were recorded by an eye-tracker while participants browsed app interfaces. The whole screen of smartphone was divided into four even regions to explore fixation durations. The results revealed that participants gave significantly longer total fixation duration on the bottom left region compared to other regions in the session (1) Longer total fixation duration on the bottom was preserved, but there is no significant difference between left side and right side in the session2. Similar to the finding of total fixation duration, first fixation duration is also predominantly paid on the bottom area of the interface. Moreover, the skill in the use of mobile phone was quantified by assessing familiarity and accuracy of phone operation and was investigated in the association with the fixation durations. We found that first fixation duration of the bottom left region is significantly negatively correlated with the smartphone operation level in the session 1, but there is no significant correlation between them in the session (2) According to the results of ratio exploration, the ratio of the first fixation duration to the total fixation duration is not significantly different between areas of interest for both sessions. The findings of this study provide insights into the attention allocation during browsing app interfaces and are of implications on the design of app interfaces and advertisements as layout can be optimized according to the attention allocation to maximally deliver information.

摘要

随着智能手机的普及和移动应用程序的渗透,人们花越来越多的时间在智能手机上与各种各样的应用程序进行交互,尤其是年轻人群体。这就引出了一个问题:人们在使用应用程序时如何分配对其界面的注意力。为了解决这个问题,在本研究中,我们设计了一个包含两个阶段的实验(即阶段1:浏览原始界面;阶段2:浏览去除颜色和背景后的界面),并结合了眼动追踪系统。在参与者浏览应用程序界面时,通过眼动仪记录注意力注视持续时间。智能手机的整个屏幕被划分为四个均等区域,以探究注视持续时间。结果显示,与阶段1中的其他区域相比,参与者在屏幕左下方区域的总注视持续时间显著更长;在阶段2中,屏幕下方的总注视持续时间仍然更长,但左侧和右侧之间没有显著差异。与总注视持续时间的发现类似,首次注视持续时间也主要集中在界面的底部区域。此外,通过评估手机操作的熟悉程度和准确性来量化手机使用技能,并研究其与注视持续时间的关联。我们发现,在阶段1中,屏幕左下方区域的首次注视持续时间与智能手机操作水平显著负相关,但在阶段2中它们之间没有显著相关性。根据比率探究的结果,两个阶段中各感兴趣区域的首次注视持续时间与总注视持续时间的比率没有显著差异。本研究的结果为浏览应用程序界面时的注意力分配提供了见解,对应用程序界面和广告的设计具有启示意义,因为可以根据注意力分配优化布局,以最大限度地传递信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f916/9279534/37a41ae75ae8/11571_2021_9760_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Attention allocation on mobile app interfaces when human interacts with them.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Aug;16(4):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09760-4. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
Enabling Psychiatrists to be Mobile Phone App Developers: Insights Into App Development Methodologies.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 11;2(4):e53. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3425.
10
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of different age-friendly smart home interface styles on the interaction behavior of elderly users.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:935202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935202. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Spatial Attention and Eye Movements.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2019;41:255-278. doi: 10.1007/7854_2019_95.
2
Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.080. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
3
Measuring advertising effectiveness in Travel 2.0 websites through eye-tracking technology.
Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 1;200:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):1-6. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y.
5
Assessing cognitive functioning in females with Rett syndrome by eye-tracking methodology.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018 Jan;22(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:47-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400.
7
EEG and Eye Tracking Demonstrate Vigilance Enhancement with Challenge Integration.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 7;10:273. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00273. eCollection 2016.
8
Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception.
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 14.
9
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
10
Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验