University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Although widely studied, the process of how mind wandering occurs and is subsequently sustained still remains unclear. Moreover, the traditional concept of mind wandering tendency/frequency based on the self- or probe-caught methods alone is incoherent and problematic. We developed a new approach to characterize the mind wandering process by combining the self-caught and probe-caught methods to estimate the time of focus and time of mind wandering separately, and examined their relationship to working memory capacity. Participants performed an OSPAN task and subsequently a basic Mindfulness Meditation Task (focus on breath). During the meditation task, participants indicated when they became aware that they were mind wandering (self-caught method), or were asked if they were mind wandering when probed (probe-caught method). Results showed that time of focus but not time of mind wandering increased with greater working memory capacity. This suggests that individuals with higher working memory capacity were able to focus on the current task longer, but had little effect on the ability to monitor and terminate mind wandering once it occurred. The theoretical and methodological implications of this new approach are discussed.
尽管思维漫游的过程及其持续发生的机制已经得到了广泛的研究,但仍不清楚其具体机制。此外,基于自我或探测捕捉方法的传统思维漫游倾向/频率的概念是不连贯和有问题的。我们开发了一种新的方法来描述思维漫游过程,将自我捕捉和探测捕捉方法结合起来,分别估计专注时间和思维漫游时间,并研究它们与工作记忆容量的关系。参与者完成了一个 OSPAN 任务,随后完成了一个基本的正念冥想任务(专注于呼吸)。在冥想任务中,参与者在意识到自己正在思维漫游时(自我捕捉方法),或在被探测时(探测捕捉方法)表明自己正在思维漫游。结果表明,专注时间而不是思维漫游时间随着工作记忆容量的增加而增加。这表明,具有较高工作记忆容量的个体能够更长时间地专注于当前任务,但对监测和终止思维漫游的能力几乎没有影响,一旦思维漫游发生。讨论了这种新方法的理论和方法学意义。