• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用经验优化构建词汇表示。

Using experiential optimization to build lexical representations.

机构信息

Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, 122 Cary Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.

Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):103-126. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1501-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-018-1501-2
PMID:29968206
Abstract

To account for natural variability in cognitive processing, it is standard practice to optimize a model's parameters by fitting it to behavioral data. Although most language-related theories acknowledge a large role for experience in language processing, variability reflecting that knowledge is usually ignored when evaluating a model's fit to representative data. We fit language-based behavioral data using experiential optimization, a method that optimizes the materials that a model is given while retaining the learning and processing mechanisms of standard practice. Rather than using default materials, experiential optimization selects the optimal linguistic sources to create a memory representation that maximizes task performance. We demonstrate performance on multiple benchmark tasks by optimizing the experience on which a model's representation is based.

摘要

为了说明认知处理中的自然变化,通过将模型拟合到行为数据上来优化模型参数是标准做法。尽管大多数与语言相关的理论都承认经验在语言处理中起着重要作用,但在评估模型对代表性数据的拟合程度时,通常会忽略反映这些知识的可变性。我们使用基于经验的优化来拟合基于语言的行为数据,这是一种在保留标准实践中的学习和处理机制的同时优化模型所获得材料的方法。基于经验的优化不是使用默认材料,而是选择最佳语言来源来创建一个记忆表示,以最大限度地提高任务绩效。我们通过优化模型表示所基于的经验来展示多个基准任务上的性能。

相似文献

1
Using experiential optimization to build lexical representations.利用经验优化构建词汇表示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):103-126. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1501-2.
2
The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity.经验在语言处理中的首要地位:语义启动主要是由经验相似性驱动的。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Aug 13;201:108939. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108939. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Determining the optimal environmental information for training computational models of lexical semantics and lexical organization.确定用于训练词汇语义和词汇组织计算模型的最佳环境信息。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2024 Sep;78(3):163-173. doi: 10.1037/cep0000344.
4
Determining the Relativity of Word Meanings Through the Construction of Individualized Models of Semantic Memory.通过构建语义记忆的个体化模型来确定词义的相对性。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Feb;48(2):e13413. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13413.
5
Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations.整合经验数据和分布数据以学习语义表示。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):463-98. doi: 10.1037/a0016261.
6
The influence of place and time on lexical behavior: A distributional analysis.地点和时间对词汇行为的影响:一种分布分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2438-2453. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01289-z.
7
Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models.从分布语义模型估计语义知识的平均需求。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1350-1370. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0732-1.
8
The Primacy of Experience in Language Processing: Semantic Priming Is Driven Primarily by Experiential Similarity.语言处理中经验的首要性:语义启动主要由经验相似性驱动。
bioRxiv. 2023 Dec 18:2023.03.21.533703. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.21.533703.
9
Generating structure from experience: A retrieval-based model of language processing.从经验中生成结构:一种基于检索的语言处理模型。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Sep;69(3):233-51. doi: 10.1037/cep0000053. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.意义的原则:从语义共现模型中提取语义维度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1744-1756. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2.

引用本文的文献

1
An embedded computational framework of memory: The critical role of representations in veridical and false recall predictions.记忆的嵌入式计算框架:表征在真实和错误回忆预测中的关键作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02669-7.
2
Contextual dynamics in lexical encoding across the ageing spectrum: A simulation study.语境动态在老化谱中的词汇编码中:一项模拟研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):2164-2182. doi: 10.1177/17470218221145685. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Semantic diversity in paired-associate learning: Further evidence for the information accumulation perspective of cognitive aging.

本文引用的文献

1
A Large-Scale Analysis of Variance in Written Language.书面语言的大规模方差分析
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42(4):1360-1374. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12583. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
2
Erratum to: Release from PI: An analysis and a model.《PI 释放:分析与模型》勘误
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):2044. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1352-2.
3
The Mismeasurement of Mind: Life-Span Changes in Paired-Associate-Learning Scores Reflect the "Cost" of Learning, Not Cognitive Decline.思维的误测:联想学习分数的寿命期变化反映的是学习的“代价”,而非认知能力下降。
在成对联想学习中的语义多样性:认知老化的信息累加观的进一步证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):114-121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01691-w.
4
Mining a Crowdsourced Dictionary to Understand Consistency and Preference in Word Meanings.挖掘众包词典以理解词义的一致性和偏好
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00268. eCollection 2019.
5
A Large-Scale Semantic Analysis of Verbal Fluency Across the Aging Spectrum: Data From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.在老龄化光谱中进行言语流畅性的大规模语义分析:来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究的数据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Oct 16;75(9):e221-e230. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz003.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1171-1179. doi: 10.1177/0956797617706393. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
Cognitive modeling as an interface between brain and behavior: Measuring the semantic decline in mild cognitive impairment.认知建模作为大脑与行为之间的接口:测量轻度认知障碍中的语义衰退。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2018 Jun;72(2):117-126. doi: 10.1037/cep0000132. Epub 2017 May 8.
5
How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant's Age.我们认识多少单词?基于单词定义、语言输入程度和参与者年龄的词汇量实际估算
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116. eCollection 2016.
6
The Role of Semantic Diversity in Word Recognition across Aging and Bilingualism.语义多样性在衰老和双语环境下单词识别中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 17;7:703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00703. eCollection 2016.
7
Applying an exemplar model to an implicit rule-learning task: Implicit learning of semantic structure.将范例模型应用于隐性规则学习任务:语义结构的隐性学习。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1049-55. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1130068. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
The influence of contextual diversity on word learning.语境多样性对词汇学习的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1214-20. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0980-7.
9
Generating structure from experience: A retrieval-based model of language processing.从经验中生成结构:一种基于检索的语言处理模型。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Sep;69(3):233-51. doi: 10.1037/cep0000053. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
Encoding sequential information in semantic space models: comparing holographic reduced representation and random permutation.在语义空间模型中编码序列信息:比较全息压缩表征与随机排列
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2015;2015:986574. doi: 10.1155/2015/986574. Epub 2015 Apr 7.