Aneeshkumar Surendran, Singh Raj B
Department of Respiratory Medicine, KIMS Kollam Multispeciality Hospital, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Lung India. 2018 Jul-Aug;35(4):312-315. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_474_17.
The presence of asthma is associated with a socioeconomic burden due to both direct and indirect cost.
This study aims to estimate the economic burden of asthma in terms of direct and indirect cost as also determine if the proper control and adherence to medication would result in reduced cost.
Direct cost was calculated in terms of medications, doctors visit, investigations, and hospitalizations. Indirect cost was calculated in terms of lost wages, termed as absenteeism. Asthma control was assessed using the asthma control test questionnaire.
A total of 120 patients were included; 69 males and 51 females. The mean annual direct cost for asthma treatment was ₹18,737/year. The mean annual cost due to medications, doctor's visit, investigations, and hospitalization was ₹7,427, ₹2089/year, ₹1103/year, and ₹62,500/year, respectively. An asthma patient lost an average of 17 working days/year. The mean annual indirect cost for an asthma patient was ₹25,358, whereas, for the caregivers was ₹19,971. About 47.5% of patients had well-controlled asthma and 52.5% of patients had uncontrolled asthma. The mean annual direct cost among controlled and uncontrolled asthma patients were ₹13,010 and ₹23,918, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of patients were compliant with medication. The mean annual direct cost among compliant and non-compliant patients was ₹14,401 and ₹24,407, respectively. Percentage of hospitalization was less among the compliant group (6%) when compared with noncompliant group (17%).
Asthma is not only associated with patient-specific impairment but also a significant economic burden to the family and society. Loss of productivity is another underappreciated source of economic loss.
哮喘的存在因直接和间接成本而与社会经济负担相关。
本研究旨在从直接和间接成本方面估算哮喘的经济负担,并确定适当的控制和坚持用药是否会降低成本。
直接成本根据药物、看医生、检查和住院来计算。间接成本根据工资损失(即旷工)来计算。使用哮喘控制测试问卷评估哮喘控制情况。
共纳入120例患者;男性69例,女性51例。哮喘治疗的年平均直接成本为每年18,737卢比。药物、看医生、检查和住院的年平均成本分别为每年7,427卢比、2,089卢比、1,103卢比和62,500卢比。哮喘患者平均每年损失17个工作日。哮喘患者的年平均间接成本为25,358卢比,而护理人员的年平均间接成本为19,971卢比。约47.5%的患者哮喘得到良好控制,52.5%的患者哮喘未得到控制。哮喘得到控制和未得到控制的患者的年平均直接成本分别为13,010卢比和23,918卢比。57%的患者坚持用药。坚持用药和未坚持用药患者的年平均直接成本分别为14,401卢比和24,407卢比。与未坚持用药组(17%)相比,坚持用药组的住院率较低(6%)。
哮喘不仅与患者特定的损害相关,而且对家庭和社会也是一项重大的经济负担。生产力损失是另一个未得到充分认识的经济损失来源。