Mendis Shanti, Fukino Keiko, Cameron Alexandra, Laing Richard, Filipe Anthonio, Khatib Oussama, Leowski Jerzy, Ewen Margaret
Department of Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Apr;85(4):279-88. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.033647.
To assess the availability and affordability of medicines used to treat cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease and glaucoma and to provide palliative cancer care in six low- and middle-income countries.
A survey of the availability and price of 32 medicines was conducted in a representative sample of public and private medicine outlets in four geographically defined areas in Bangladesh, Brazil, Malawi, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. We analysed the percentage of these medicines available, the median price versus the international reference price (expressed as the median price ratio) and affordability in terms of the number of days wages it would cost the lowest-paid government worker to purchase one month of treatment.
In all countries<or=7.5% of these 32 medicines were available in the public sector, except in Brazil, where 30% were available, and Sri Lanka, where 28% were available. Median price ratios varied substantially, from 0.09 for losartan in Sri Lanka to 30.44 for aspirin in Brazil. In the private sector in Malawi and Sri Lanka, the cost of innovator products (the pharmaceutical product first given marketing authorization) was three times more than generic medicines. One month of combination treatment for coronary heart disease cost 18.4 days wages in Malawi, 6.1 days wages in Nepal, 5.4 in Pakistan and 5.1 in Brazil; in Bangladesh the cost was 1.6 days wages and in Sri Lanka it was 1.5. The cost of one month of combination treatment for asthma ranged from 1.3 days wages in Bangladesh to 9.2 days wages in Malawi. The cost of a one-month course of intermediate-acting insulin ranged from 2.8 days wages in Brazil to 19.6 in Malawi.
Context-specific policies are required to improve access to essential medicines. Generic products should be promoted by educating professionals and consumers, by implementing appropriate policies and incentives, and by introducing market competition and/or price regulation. Improving governance and management efficiency, and assessing local supply options, may improve availability. Prices could be reduced by improving purchasing efficiency, eliminating taxes and regulating mark-ups.
评估六个低收入和中等收入国家用于治疗心血管疾病、糖尿病、慢性呼吸道疾病和青光眼以及提供癌症姑息治疗的药品的可及性和可负担性。
在孟加拉国、巴西、马拉维、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡四个地理区域的公共和私立药品销售点的代表性样本中,对32种药品的可及性和价格进行了调查。我们分析了这些药品的可得百分比、中位数价格与国际参考价格之比(以中位数价格比表示)以及以最低工资的政府工作人员购买一个月治疗所需天数的工资来衡量的可负担性。
在所有国家,这32种药品在公共部门的可及率均≤7.5%,巴西除外,其可及率为30%,斯里兰卡为28%。中位数价格比差异很大,从斯里兰卡氯沙坦的0.09到巴西阿司匹林的30.44。在马拉维和斯里兰卡的私营部门,创新产品(首个获得上市许可的药品)的成本是仿制药的三倍。在马拉维,一个月的冠心病联合治疗费用相当于18.4天的工资,尼泊尔为6.1天,巴基斯坦为5.4天,巴西为5.1天;在孟加拉国,成本为1.6天的工资,在斯里兰卡为1.5天。一个月的哮喘联合治疗费用从孟加拉国的1.3天工资到马拉维的9.2天工资不等。一个月的中效胰岛素疗程费用从巴西的2.8天工资到马拉维的19.6天工资不等。
需要制定因地制宜的政策来改善基本药物的可及性。应通过教育专业人员和消费者、实施适当政策和激励措施、引入市场竞争和/或价格监管来推广仿制药。改善治理和管理效率,评估当地供应选择,可能会提高可及性。可以通过提高采购效率、取消税收和规范加价来降低价格。