• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右美托咪定与咪达唑仑鼻内用药对牙科诊所2-6岁不合作儿童行为的术前用药效果

Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic.

作者信息

Mahdavi Alireza, Fallahinejad Ghajari Masoud, Ansari Ghassem, Shafiei Leila

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Professor, Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Mar;15(2):79-85.

PMID:29971125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6026311/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the intranasal premedication effect of newly introduced dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus midazolam on the behavior of uncooperative children in the dental clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 20 uncooperative children aged 2-6 years who required at least two similar dental treatment visits. The subjects were randomly given 1 μg/kg of DEX and 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam via the intranasal route. For the sedation protocol in the two groups, 0.25 mg/kg of atropine in combination with 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam added to 1-2 mg/kg of ketamine were used 30 minutes after premedication and transferring the patient to the operating room. Dental treatments were carried out by a pediatric dentist blinded to the type of the administered premedication. The sedative efficacy (overall success rate) of the agents was assessed by two independent pediatric dentists based on the Houpt scale. Data analyses were carried out according to Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the premedication efficacy of intranasal DEX and midazolam according to the Houpt scale (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intranasal midazolam and DEX are satisfactory and effective premedication regimens for uncooperative children.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较新引入的右美托咪定(DEX)与咪达唑仑对牙科诊所中不合作儿童行为的鼻内术前用药效果。

材料与方法

本交叉双盲临床试验针对20名年龄在2至6岁之间、需要至少两次类似牙科治疗就诊的不合作儿童进行。受试者通过鼻内途径随机给予1μg/kg的DEX和0.5mg/kg的咪达唑仑。对于两组的镇静方案,在术前用药并将患者转移至手术室30分钟后,使用0.25mg/kg的阿托品与0.5mg/kg的咪达唑仑联合加入1至2mg/kg的氯胺酮。牙科治疗由对所给予的术前用药类型不知情的儿科牙医进行。药物的镇静效果(总体成功率)由两名独立的儿科牙医根据豪普特量表进行评估。数据分析根据威尔科克森符号秩检验和配对t检验进行。

结果

根据豪普特量表,鼻内DEX和咪达唑仑的术前用药效果无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

鼻内咪达唑仑和DEX是用于不合作儿童令人满意且有效的术前用药方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd9f/6026311/bb8faec08c7e/JOD-15-79-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd9f/6026311/bb8faec08c7e/JOD-15-79-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd9f/6026311/bb8faec08c7e/JOD-15-79-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑鼻内用药对牙科诊所2-6岁不合作儿童行为的术前用药效果
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Mar;15(2):79-85.
2
Comparison of Oral and Intranasal Midazolam/Ketamine Sedation in 3-6-year-old Uncooperative Dental Patients.3至6岁不合作牙科患者口服与鼻内咪达唑仑/氯胺酮镇静效果的比较
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Spring;9(2):61-5. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.013. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
3
Cardiorespiratory Response to Sedative Premedication in Preschool Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Midazolam, Clonidine, and Dexmedetomidine.学龄前儿童镇静前用药的心肺反应:咪达唑仑、可乐定和右美托咪定的随机对照试验。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2023 Jun;38(3):454-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.08.009. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Comparison of two Intranasal Sedatives, Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine, in Children with High Dental Fear: a Randomized Clinical Trial.两种鼻内镇静剂(咪达唑仑与右美托咪定)用于高度牙科恐惧症儿童的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Jun;23(2):129-136. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.89323.1406.
5
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation.经鼻给予右美托咪定与口服氯胺酮对比经鼻给予咪达唑仑用于牙科修复儿童术前用药的比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):e85227. doi: 10.5812/aapm.85227. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Evaluation of the sedative effect of intranasal versus intramuscular ketamine in 2-6-year-old uncooperative dental patients.评估鼻腔内与肌肉内给予氯胺酮对 2-6 岁不合作牙科患儿的镇静效果。
Dent Med Probl. 2024 Jan-Feb;61(1):35-41. doi: 10.17219/dmp/144364.
7
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.鼻腔内给予右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于接受全口牙齿修复的儿童术前用药:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine combination as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑 - 氯胺酮联合用药作为儿科牙科镇静剂的比较评价:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;7(2):186-92. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.183058.
9
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as Premedication in Pediatric Surgical Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.小儿外科手术患者中鼻内给予右美托咪定与咪达唑仑作为术前用药的比较:一项前瞻性、随机双盲研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):384-389. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_102_20. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
Comparison of oral dexmedetomidine and midazolam for premedication and emergence delirium in children after dental procedures under general anesthesia: a retrospective study.口腔给予右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于全身麻醉下儿童牙科手术后的术前用药及苏醒期谵妄的比较:一项回顾性研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Mar 28;12:647-653. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S163828. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and acceptance of intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam for sedation in children aged 5-8 years using a mucosal atomizer device: a randomized controlled clinical study.使用黏膜雾化器装置对5至8岁儿童进行鼻内右美托咪定和鼻内咪达唑仑镇静效果及接受度的比较评估:一项随机对照临床研究。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Apr;25(2):109-122. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.2.109. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
The implementation of conscious sedation by dental professionals in Egypt: an analytical cross-sectional study.埃及牙科专业人员实施清醒镇静:一项分析性横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(1):16502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66834-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Conscious Sedation: Emerging Trends in Pediatric Dentistry.清醒镇静:儿科牙科的新趋势
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):277-281. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.171458.
2
A comparison of oral midazolam and oral dexmedetomidine as premedication in pediatric anesthesia.口服咪达唑仑与口服右美托咪定作为小儿麻醉术前用药的比较。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Oct-Dec;10(4):390-394. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.177333.
3
Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine for premedication in pediatrics patients: A randomized double-blind study.
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Nasal Sedation Midazolam Compared with Dexmedetomidine in the Management of Uncooperative Children with Down Syndrome during Dental Treatment.
比较咪达唑仑与右美托咪定在牙科治疗中对不合作唐氏综合征患儿进行鼻内镇静的疗效评估。
Int J Dent. 2022 Sep 16;2022:7344928. doi: 10.1155/2022/7344928. eCollection 2022.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures.系统评价和荟萃分析比较右美托咪定与咪达唑仑作为小儿牙科手术患者的预用药和镇静剂的疗效。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Dec;27(4):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01087-6. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
小儿患者术前使用鼻内右美托咪定与右美托咪定-氯胺酮的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):349-55. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.172340.
4
Dexmedetomidine: A Review of a Newer Sedative in Dentistry.右美托咪定:牙科新型镇静剂综述
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Fall;39(5):401-9. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.401.
5
Pediatric dental sedation: challenges and opportunities.儿童牙科镇静:挑战与机遇
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Aug 26;7:97-106. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S64250. eCollection 2015.
6
Comparison of Oral and Intranasal Midazolam/Ketamine Sedation in 3-6-year-old Uncooperative Dental Patients.3至6岁不合作牙科患者口服与鼻内咪达唑仑/氯胺酮镇静效果的比较
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Spring;9(2):61-5. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.013. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
7
Comparative evaluation of midazolam and clonidine as pediatric oral premedication.咪达唑仑与可乐定作为儿科口服术前用药的比较评价
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 May-Aug;7(2):221-7. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.118967.
8
Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.小儿患者使用右美托咪定进行术前用药:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Nov;69(11):777-86. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)12.
9
A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study.鼻内给予右美托咪定、咪达唑仑和氯胺酮镇静镇痛特性的比较评估:一项三盲随机研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.l828585807482966.
10
Initial experience with dexmedetomidine for dental sedation in children.右美托咪定用于儿童牙科镇静的初步经验。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Fall;38(1):79-81. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.1.w86t8k7r51k72617.