Suppr超能文献

两种鼻内镇静剂(咪达唑仑与右美托咪定)用于高度牙科恐惧症儿童的比较:一项随机临床试验

Comparison of two Intranasal Sedatives, Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine, in Children with High Dental Fear: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Salem Katayoun, Khoshrang Hossein, Esmaeeli Elham, Vatankhah Mona

机构信息

Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Guilan Dental school, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Jun;23(2):129-136. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.89323.1406.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Pharmacologic management of uncooperative behavior is a growing trend in dentistry. Determining the most appropriate drug, route of administration, and proper candidate for sedation have been the goal of several investigations.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the sedative effect of intranasal (IN) sedation of midazolam (MDZ) in compare to dexmedetomidine (DEX) while taking into consideration the effect of dental fear, and psychological status on sedation success.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This double-blind randomized clinical trial included 92 uncooperative dental patients aged 4-6. Study participants were randomly assigned to receive either 0.2mg/kg IN MDZ or 1µg/kg DEX. Sedation was evaluated using the Houpt sedation rating scale. Vital signs were recorded before and during sedation. Prior to sedation, the level of dental fear was determined through children's fear survey schedule-dental subscale (CFSS-DS). Psychological characteristics were screened using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Data were analyzed using T-test, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Overall ratings of sedation and subscales of sleep, crying, and movement were comparable between groups (> 0.05); however, more acceptable behavior (overall scores (4+5+6) was observed in MDZ group compared to DEX group (64% vs. 47.7%) (= 0.007). All participants were found to have abnormal levels of dental fear (CFSS-DS≥38). However, according to SDQ, the study participants have mainly shown normal behavioral status. A significant association was found between dental fear and sedation success (MDZ, = 0.001, DEX, = 0.03), while similar findings were not observed for psychological characteristics (MDZ, = 0.09 and = 0.41; DEX, = 0.71 and = 0.53). Physiological parameters remained within normal limits in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Sedation with IN MDZ resulted in overall behaviors, which were more satisfactory in highly fearful pediatric dental patients. Despite baseline uncooperative behaviors, the psychological status of study participants were close to average and were not associated with sedation failure.

摘要

问题陈述

药物治疗不合作行为在牙科领域呈增长趋势。确定最合适的药物、给药途径以及合适的镇静候选者一直是多项研究的目标。

目的

本研究的目的是比较咪达唑仑(MDZ)与右美托咪定(DEX)鼻内镇静的镇静效果,同时考虑牙科恐惧和心理状态对镇静成功的影响。

材料与方法

这项双盲随机临床试验纳入了92名4至6岁不合作的牙科患者。研究参与者被随机分配接受0.2mg/kg鼻内MDZ或1µg/kg DEX。使用Houpt镇静评分量表评估镇静效果。在镇静前和镇静期间记录生命体征。在镇静前,通过儿童恐惧调查量表 - 牙科子量表(CFSS - DS)确定牙科恐惧程度。使用优势与困难问卷(SDQ)筛查心理特征。数据采用T检验、曼 - 惠特尼检验、卡方检验和重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析。

结果

两组之间镇静的总体评分以及睡眠、哭闹和活动的子量表评分相当(>0.05);然而,与DEX组相比,MDZ组观察到更可接受的行为(总体评分(4 + 5 + 6),分别为64%对47.7%)(P = 0.007)。发现所有参与者的牙科恐惧水平均异常(CFSS - DS≥38)。然而,根据SDQ,研究参与者主要表现出正常的行为状态。发现牙科恐惧与镇静成功之间存在显著关联(MDZ,P = 0.00​​1,DEX,P = 0.03),而心理特征方面未观察到类似结果(MDZ,P = 0.09和P = 0.41;DEX,P = 0.71和P = 0.53)。两组的生理参数均保持在正常范围内。

结论

鼻内MDZ镇静导致总体行为在高度恐惧的儿科牙科患者中更令人满意。尽管基线存在不合作行为,但研究参与者的心理状态接近平均水平,且与镇静失败无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b1f/9206707/9934a87dfd66/JDS-23-129-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验