Ryan Joanne, Fransquet Peter, Wrigglesworth Jo, Lacaze Paul
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;6:181. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00181. eCollection 2018.
Dementia can result from a number of distinct diseases with differing etiology and pathophysiology. Even within the same disease, there is considerable phenotypic heterogeneity with varying symptoms and disease trajectories. Dementia diagnosis is thus very complex, time-consuming, and expensive and can only be made definitively post-mortem with histopathological confirmation. These inherent difficulties combined with the overlap of some symptoms and even neuropathological features, present a challenging problem for research in the field. This has likely hampered progress in epidemiological studies of risk factors and preventative interventions, as well as genetic and biomarker research. Resource limitations in large epidemiologically studies mean that limited diagnostic criteria are often used, which can result in phenotypically heterogeneous disease states being grouped together, potentially resulting in misclassification bias. When biomarkers are identified for etiologically heterogeneous diseases, they will have low specificity for any utility in clinical practice, even if their sensitivity is high. We highlight several challenges in in the field which must be addressed for the success of future genetic and biomarker studies, and may be key to the development of the most effective treatments. As a step toward achieving this goal, defining the dementia as a biological construct based on the presence of specific pathological features, rather than clinical symptoms, will enable more precise predictive models. It has the potential to lead to the discovery of novel genetic variants, as well as the identification of individuals at heightened risk of the disease, even prior to the appearance of clinical symptoms.
痴呆症可能由多种病因和病理生理学不同的独特疾病引起。即使在同一种疾病中,也存在相当大的表型异质性,症状和疾病轨迹各不相同。因此,痴呆症的诊断非常复杂、耗时且昂贵,只有在尸检时通过组织病理学确认才能明确诊断。这些内在的困难,再加上一些症状甚至神经病理学特征的重叠,给该领域的研究带来了一个具有挑战性的问题。这可能阻碍了风险因素和预防干预的流行病学研究以及基因和生物标志物研究的进展。大型流行病学研究中的资源限制意味着通常使用有限的诊断标准,这可能导致表型异质的疾病状态被归为一类,从而可能导致错误分类偏差。当为病因异质性疾病确定生物标志物时,即使其敏感性很高,它们在临床实践中的任何用途的特异性也会很低。我们强调了该领域中必须解决的几个挑战,以确保未来基因和生物标志物研究的成功,这些挑战可能是开发最有效治疗方法的关键。作为朝着实现这一目标迈出的一步,将痴呆症定义为基于特定病理特征而非临床症状的生物学结构,将能够建立更精确的预测模型。它有可能导致发现新的基因变异,以及识别出即使在临床症状出现之前就有更高疾病风险的个体。