Suppr超能文献

痴呆症中的表型异质性:对流行病学和生物标志物研究的挑战。

Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Dementia: A Challenge for Epidemiology and Biomarker Studies.

作者信息

Ryan Joanne, Fransquet Peter, Wrigglesworth Jo, Lacaze Paul

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;6:181. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00181. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Dementia can result from a number of distinct diseases with differing etiology and pathophysiology. Even within the same disease, there is considerable phenotypic heterogeneity with varying symptoms and disease trajectories. Dementia diagnosis is thus very complex, time-consuming, and expensive and can only be made definitively post-mortem with histopathological confirmation. These inherent difficulties combined with the overlap of some symptoms and even neuropathological features, present a challenging problem for research in the field. This has likely hampered progress in epidemiological studies of risk factors and preventative interventions, as well as genetic and biomarker research. Resource limitations in large epidemiologically studies mean that limited diagnostic criteria are often used, which can result in phenotypically heterogeneous disease states being grouped together, potentially resulting in misclassification bias. When biomarkers are identified for etiologically heterogeneous diseases, they will have low specificity for any utility in clinical practice, even if their sensitivity is high. We highlight several challenges in in the field which must be addressed for the success of future genetic and biomarker studies, and may be key to the development of the most effective treatments. As a step toward achieving this goal, defining the dementia as a biological construct based on the presence of specific pathological features, rather than clinical symptoms, will enable more precise predictive models. It has the potential to lead to the discovery of novel genetic variants, as well as the identification of individuals at heightened risk of the disease, even prior to the appearance of clinical symptoms.

摘要

痴呆症可能由多种病因和病理生理学不同的独特疾病引起。即使在同一种疾病中,也存在相当大的表型异质性,症状和疾病轨迹各不相同。因此,痴呆症的诊断非常复杂、耗时且昂贵,只有在尸检时通过组织病理学确认才能明确诊断。这些内在的困难,再加上一些症状甚至神经病理学特征的重叠,给该领域的研究带来了一个具有挑战性的问题。这可能阻碍了风险因素和预防干预的流行病学研究以及基因和生物标志物研究的进展。大型流行病学研究中的资源限制意味着通常使用有限的诊断标准,这可能导致表型异质的疾病状态被归为一类,从而可能导致错误分类偏差。当为病因异质性疾病确定生物标志物时,即使其敏感性很高,它们在临床实践中的任何用途的特异性也会很低。我们强调了该领域中必须解决的几个挑战,以确保未来基因和生物标志物研究的成功,这些挑战可能是开发最有效治疗方法的关键。作为朝着实现这一目标迈出的一步,将痴呆症定义为基于特定病理特征而非临床症状的生物学结构,将能够建立更精确的预测模型。它有可能导致发现新的基因变异,以及识别出即使在临床症状出现之前就有更高疾病风险的个体。

相似文献

3
The current status of blood epigenetic biomarkers for dementia.痴呆症血液表观遗传生物标志物的现状。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Nov;56(7):435-457. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1639129. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
7
8

引用本文的文献

5
Adaptive Subtype and Stage Inference for Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病的适应性亚型和阶段推断
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2024 Oct;15003:46-55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72384-1_5. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Clinical prevalence of Lewy body dementia.路易体痴呆的临床患病率。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Feb 15;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0350-6.
3
Dementia burden coming into focus.痴呆症负担日益受到关注。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2606. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33304-4.
6
8
Opening up the DNA methylome of dementia.开启痴呆症的DNA甲基化组研究。
Mol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;22(4):485-496. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.242. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
10
Alzheimer's disease: expedition into the unknown.阿尔茨海默病:探索未知之旅。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2713. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32457-6. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验